Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foreign observers to treat U.S. like a third world delinquent [Alcee Hastings in charge!] ^ | August 27, 2004 | Tom Deweese

Posted on 08/27/2004 12:42:44 PM PDT by snopercod

Here’s the line in the sand. Americans can either sit down and do nothing about a planned invasion of foreign election observers or stand for their liberty by saying no. There is no middle ground.

The Bush Administration, through Secretary of State Colin Powell, has given into pressure from thirteen far-left Democrat members of the House of Representatives and invited an international group to officially observe the November presidential election.

Earlier this year, the thirteen Congressmen, led by Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX), wrote a letter to United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan to request UN observers for the 2004 presidential election. Johnson and her cohorts used the 2000 election troubles in Florida to declare that the United States couldn’t be trusted to conduct a fair election. “As legislators, we should guarantee the American people that our country will not experience another nightmare like the 2000 presidential election,” Johnson wrote to Annan. The UN leader turned down the request, saying the U.S. government must first invite the UN.

Few, at the time, took the effort seriously. It was obvious that Johnson was playing politics, trying to embarrass President Bush by stirring up tired old rhetoric about a stolen election in 2000. The truth is, after the dust had settled in 2000 and the courts had decided the outcome, at least two separate news organizations counted the ballots yet again and, in each case, Bush’s lead increased. There was no fraud or questionable result. America’s election system worked properly and the outcome was legitimate.

There was no reason for any American government official, especially from the Bush Administration, to take action on the demands of a few discredited, far-left Democrat congressmen.  In fact, outraged Republican congressmen managed to pass an amendment to a foreign aid bill barring federal officials from using money to ask the UN to observe the election. 

But, bolstered by a few good headlines, Johnson and crew refused to quit. They  wrote a letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell, asking him to make the formal request to Kofi Annan. That’s when the shocker came. In a letter to Johnson, dated July 30th, Assistant Secretary of State Paul Kelly told her that the United States had issued an invitation to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to serve as official observers for the November presidential election

“Who,” asked an entire nation, including most of Congress, “is the OSCE?” For the record, it’s an international organization of 55 nations from Europe, Central Asia and North America, based in Vienna, Austria. The United States has been a participating member since 1990. The OSCE calls itself the “largest regional security organization in the world.” Its website says the OSCE is “active in early warning, conflict prevention, crisis management and post-conflict rehabilitation

Apparently, the OSCE is the bunch called in to make sure all the new social democracies created after the fall of the Soviet empire are overseen by the proper authorities. The group made itself responsible for a wide range of security-related issues including arms control, preventive diplomacy, confidence and security building measures, human rights, democratization, election monitoring, and even economic and environmental security. It sounds like the makings of a world police force. And these are the guys Colin Powell decided to bring to the United States to police our election

So, how well does the OSCE do its job? Well, according to Representative Ron Paul (R-TX): “We should be wary about organizations like the OSCE that seek to involve themselves in our electoral process. The OSCE in particular has a terrible record in the newly democratic countries of central Europe, where it normally operates. According to groups that follow OSCE, this organization does much more to undermine free elections than to promote them.”  


In Bosnia in 1996, Paul reports, the OSCE approved parliamentary elections despite the fact that an impossible 107 percent of the eligible voting-age population supposedly had voted. “This year,” Paul said, “the OSCE approved the election of Mikheil Saakashvili in the former Soviet Republic of Georgia with a Saddam Hussein-like 97 percent of the vote

If that’s not bad enough, in July of this year, the OSCE elected Florida Congressman Alcee Hastings to be president of its Parliamentary Assembly. Alcee Hastings’ district includes Broward County, one of the most contested in the 2000 election. Hastings has not been an innocent bystander in the election controversy. On June 14th he said, “anyway you cut it, these people (the Bush Administration) are going to try to steal this election.” Alcee Hastings is the man who will pick where OSCE observers will be placed. He will also have a major voice in the OSCE’s final report on the election. So much for impartial observers. The fix is in.

And it gets even worse. Alcee Hastings is a former federal judge who was impeached by the U.S. Congress in 1998 after being caught in an FBI sting operation for taking bribes. The Congress voted 413 – 3 to impeach and remove Hastings from the bench

Now in Congress, Hastings hasn’t changed his shady ways. He is currently under investigation by both the Federal and Florida election commissions. There are also charges of cronyism and intimidation flying around his re-election campaign. Apparently Alcee is a real piece of work

The question must be asked: what kind of organization elects such a man as its president? And why in the world is the United States involved with it, supplying money to the tune of $25 million? And why have we invited them to observe our elections?

Rep. Johnson says the OSCE is involved to “ensure free and fair elections.” Rep. Lamar Smith, a Republican also from Texas, says he “smells politics.” That’s why he and ten fellow members of Congress sent a letter to Secretary Powell requesting some answers. Smith wants to know if the State Department had planned to invite the OSCE even before receiving Johnson’s letter. Smith also wants to know if the OSCE’s monitoring of this year’s election is a direct response to the “contested presidential election in 2000.” And above all, he has asked Secretary Powell to reveal what cities and states the observers will be deployed, as well as who determines these locations. We obviously have one answer-- Alcee Hastings. But that didn’t come from the State Department

The DeWeese Report called the State Department with some additional questions.  We want to know what kind of credentials the observers would wear to alert voters to their presence. We also want to know what official authority they would be operating under and what, if any, influence they would wield over the elections.

No answers, either to The DeWeese Report or Rep. Smith, have been received. All of our questions were answered with, “we don’t know.” The State Department will only say that the details will be determined after members of the OSCE visit the U.S. in September.  We were told to call the OSCE directly for answers

A spokesman for the OSCE in Vienna, said the group does not have authority over election results in any way. “We don’t give them a yes or no or grade them,” she said. “But we monitor, we publicize what we see. You can call it political pressure.

So here we have an international organization, with a budget of over $200 million, invited by our own State Department as a defensive maneuver against angry, radical Democrats still sour over losing the last election. Under that banner, the OSCE, led by an impeached and disgraced former judge, stands ready to storm the American election with observations teams, yet not a single American official knows where they will be posted, what they will be authorized to do, or what authority they will have in observing the elections. Meanwhile, the OSCE is telling us that they will bring political pressure to bear on what they see. Any guesses on what direction that political pressure will take

The United States is not a social democracy in which the all-powerful central government controls the elections. Nor are we a third-world delinquent where dictators must be watched to make sure they aren’t taking off with the goods. We are a Republic, which means our elections are not controlled by the federal government in Washington, but rather by the states and local governments. It’s the states that operate the elections and it’s the states that certify them. Through that system, we have been holding free and peaceful elections for two hundred years.

Allowing an outside policing agency to meddle in our elections can only have devastating results. Imagine the 2000 election, had the OSCE been involved. The Gore campaign raised questions about the results. The battle went on for weeks. Instead of having it decided in our own justice system, the issue may have been resolved with international observers suddenly flashing their badges and applying their “political pressure” to nullify the outcome, making it nearly impossible for local election officials to perform their jobs in a fair manner. As already mentioned, follow-up recounts performed by private news organizations who, frankly, would have been overjoyed to find a different result, found only that the Bush lead increased with each recount. That’s why the issue went away except in the minds of Democrats like Eddie Bernice Johnson.

There’s more to consider in allowing foreign election observers into this nation. Rep. Johnson and her crew try to sell the OSCE observers as a way to “proudly show our democratic system, warts and all.” But that’s not the game being played here. This is about a political agenda to broadcast U.S. elections as unfair and invalid. The true result of an invasion of foreign observers would be to diminish our stature in the rest of the world. It would intimidate American voters as they pass by foreign officials wearing imposing badges of identification. Above all, it would be an act of voluntary surrender of a major piece of our national sovereignty.

The issue of allowing the OSCE to enter our nation to observe our elections is not about guaranteeing free and fair elections. The result will be just the opposite. It is a power grab of massive proportions. The real game is the drive to erase our sovereign borders and bring the U.S. into international submission. If allowed to move forward, it is the first step in the final drive to bury the United States forever in the dung heap of the global village.

The line in the sand has been drawn. What will it be America? Do we hang our heads in shame by allowing outside forces decide how we conduct our national business or do we fight for our liberty and independence by telling the Bush Administration to rescind its invitation to the OSCE? The White House phone number is (202) 456-1414. Make the call. Your liberty is at stake

Tom DeWeese is the publisher/editor of The DeWeese Report and president of the American Policy Center, an activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, VA. The Center maintains a website at

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: alceehastings; observers; osce; voterfraud
Alcee Hasting, impeached judge and arch democRAT will be in charge of this? Somebody beam me up...
1 posted on 08/27/2004 12:42:45 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snopercod

I am really going far out on limb and will predict that the day after the election the only states found with voting problems will those that Bush won.

2 posted on 08/27/2004 12:45:07 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
No, it's PERFECT. Now the observers can be discredited (as if they needed to be) because THEY'RE LED BY A MEMBER OF THE OPPOSITION PARTY. Whatever they say is immediately discreditable as the 'impartial observer' tries to THROW IT TO HIS OWN PARTY.
3 posted on 08/27/2004 12:52:01 PM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

bump for evidence that democrats are criminals

4 posted on 08/27/2004 12:56:00 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

I live in Florida, and if it would shut Corrine Brown up, I'd pay 25 mil( of taxpayers money) to do it.

5 posted on 08/27/2004 12:56:34 PM PDT by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Does this mean we get jimmy carter to oversee the elections like he did for chavez ?

6 posted on 08/27/2004 1:04:35 PM PDT by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Them foreigners best not get in this Texas gals way when she votes, I'llnot only SHOW them THIRD WORLD, I'll send them there!!

7 posted on 08/27/2004 1:08:21 PM PDT by hushpad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinives

If the libs would do their job there wouldn't be a problem. It's always the Democratic areas run by Democrats that have all the problems. Wonder if that's intentional????

8 posted on 08/27/2004 1:08:57 PM PDT by truthseeker2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Alcee Hastings, "champion of the downtrodded."


9 posted on 08/27/2004 1:12:59 PM PDT by auboy (MSM's creed: see no truth, hear no truth, speak no truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

I am disgusted that Bush even caved in to the democrats request to have our election monitored. We are not a bannana republic. It is insulting for them to have even asked for it & worse that Bush agreed to it.

10 posted on 08/27/2004 1:31:19 PM PDT by Feiny (It's only your fault if you don't hate yourself enough to do something about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass
I have to agree. What was President Bush thinking?

Can you picture Ronald Reagan doing something like this?

Yeah, me either.

11 posted on 08/27/2004 1:41:01 PM PDT by snopercod (The oldest civil war of all, that between the city and the country, has resumed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
If it put an end to Wisconsin college students voting Dem 150 times, or actually closed the polls in North Saint Louis on time, or kept the dead in their graves in Chicago, or kept 60,000 New Yorkers with winter homes in Fla. from voting in Fla., or several hundred other Dem. scams I would actually be FOR this. But as usual, the fix is in and none of these scams will be monitored. It will only be 72 year old black ladies in wheelchairs that these folks will be concerned about and it will be front page on the NYSlimes.
12 posted on 08/27/2004 1:54:32 PM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
foreign election observers or stand for their liberty by saying no

If there's nothing wrong with our election process, why would I object to someone watching?  God knows we send observers at the drop of a hat ourselves. My liberty is no more at stake here than by having foreign military observers do joint ops with American troops.
13 posted on 08/27/2004 7:01:45 PM PDT by gcruse (
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hushpad

That makes two of us .

14 posted on 08/27/2004 7:03:25 PM PDT by Texasforever (God can send you to hell but he can't sue you. He can't find a lawyer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snopercod


15 posted on 08/27/2004 8:17:29 PM PDT by RippleFire ("It was just a scratch")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Bush, gutting the First Amendment, givng Social Security benefits to Illegals and having foreigners watching over our elections.

What a putz.

16 posted on 08/27/2004 8:20:06 PM PDT by Guillermo (These are the two worst candidates for President in a very long time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Are you being sarcastic? If not, my response to you is:

You DumbAss, you SOOOO Do Not Get It!

The basic rule is: If you see a Blue Helmet at the polls -- Shoot a hole the size of Texas right through it. A bloody, dead as a door nail hole so big there'll be no hanging chad, ergh, brains. A clean hole with nothing but a nice whistlin breeze a blowin through.

17 posted on 08/28/2004 1:06:18 AM PDT by James Mabry (Tell me again why I have to tolerate Socialists/Progressives on American soil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
If there's nothing wrong with our election process, why would I object to someone watching?

Any American has that right. You can walk down to your board of elections right now and sign up to be a poll observer.

But foreigners have no right to join in the conduct of our elections here in the U.S.. Those are run by the states, and the U.S. constitution specifically prohibits any state from making an alliance with a foreign power.

It's a given that the OSCE will find "irregularities" in the 2004 elections. What then? Should we grant unelected, non-citizen, foreign "observers" the right to veto our constitutional processes for electing our representatives?

On what basis and under what law?

18 posted on 08/28/2004 2:39:29 AM PDT by snopercod (The oldest civil war of all, that between the city and the country, has resumed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

I believe I read an article earlier similar about this issue. I was suprised not too many comments.

Yes we are a third world country. California has imported half of their population from the third world. Article in L.A. Daily News, Thursday, one in three children living in poverty. Broken marriages, and third world unskilled workers make this up.

It is what we have become, I am sorry to say.

19 posted on 08/28/2004 6:47:48 AM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Right on!

20 posted on 08/28/2004 6:53:28 AM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

That's no limb you're on. You just are showing common sense!

21 posted on 08/28/2004 6:55:45 AM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: James Mabry

If you see a Blue Helmet at the polls -- Shoot a hole the size of Texas right through it<<<<<<<

Hey, I'm for it myself!

Why is Bush giving in to this kay-arr-ay-pee?

Are each of our pres. candidates willing to sell out America? Are each of these candidates socialists?

WHAT are "WE THE PEOPLE" going to do about this travisty?

22 posted on 08/28/2004 3:26:37 PM PDT by hushpad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
If there's nothing wrong with our election process, why would I object to someone watching?

With the likes of Alcee Hastings involved you know that some impropriety is bound to be found, Republican of course.

Then what?

23 posted on 08/28/2004 3:41:06 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EdReform


24 posted on 10/04/2004 8:02:51 AM PDT by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson