Skip to comments.Ah, Reuters (You won't believe this one!)
Posted on 08/27/2004 5:29:13 PM PDT by TonyInOhio
click here to read article
Liberal Media Bias ?!?!?!?
Playing games with mindless lefties is a lot of fun. How about writing to him to let him know that, oops, the man who was going to invent the cure for AIDS was aborted instead. Or, that the human who was going to be the first woman to be elected as the American President (running on the Progressive Party ticket, too!), was instead aborted. Can you imagine the wailing coming from some Reuters office (um, I mean, broom closet) as a result?
Uhhhh...is this a-hole one step away from advocating summary execution of all kids who flunk out of school or perhaps have IQs below 100 or if they're caught for petty larceny when they're 14 years old? These people are fascists...
Another liberal handringer who believes the solution to future problems is to kill babys, the handicapped, the old, the infirm, and anyone else that may prove inconveinent for them in the future when they plan to spend the wealth that they now amass in their selfishness.
[Troll- and Flame- bait: Asbestos suit off, author
fleeing for dear life.]
From a certain point of view this is consistent with
the "we have to destroy this village to save it"
mentality from Vietnam (which Kerry implied was widespread). Compare and contrast this to Hillary's
"It takes a village to raise an [idiot]". :-)
Please note first line of post before responding.
"Has anyone tracked down this slimebags e-mail address?"
Yup, uh huh, sounds like he needs a good FReepin!
They are already rounding up, why wait, it's election season.
God, how I loathe them.
Well put, me too, seriesly.
I believe the email address in 59 is the way to go.
Incredible! Thanks .....
In case you had any doubt about the Media Wing of the Democrat Party...
"I believe the email address in 59 is the way to go."
Yup, I'm on it.
(%#*^!$##@) stupid kool-aid drinker.
Release the hounds!
He's only advocating keeping our streets safe... /Sarcasm.
If that's true, then they also help undermine the cred of the msm in this country. Double agents! I love it. But... shhhhh!
Jiminy. This guy thinks unwanted kids should be killed. I'm surprised he didn't propose killing all the retarded people to save money.
Well, that confirms it The Democrat plan to lower the crime rate is to kill all the children so they dont grow up into criminals.
This shouldn't come as a surprise.....
A chill wind.
We should really contact this clown's boss, if we can figure out who it is. He should condemn it, if he doesn't, maybe we can bait him too.
I have a plan. How about the father and mother of those children support the children they co-create?
Just an idea.
He will. Then old people. I even hear calls for brownshirt tactics against old people here on FR.
The left uses Krystallnacht tactics.
the Bush deficit?
how about a REAL problem...
Yeah, let them keep killing babies and we can make more room for all these illegals and all the babies they WILL HAVE, then they can yell that the government is not doing enough for the poor and it is George Bush's fault. (Big 4 letter word here) that I can't put in.........
Oh good grief. I cannot believe they are so blatant. What kind of people are they anyway? It staggers the mind.
Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
My e-mail to the nit-wit:
In response to the following:
Ah, Reuters (You won't believe this one!)
The Corner on National Review Online ^ | 08/27/04 |
Doug Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee, sent out a press release on the latest partial-birth ruling. Here's an email he got in response from Todd Eastham, the North American news editor for Reuters:
"What's your plan for parenting & educating all the unwanted children you people want to bring into the world? Who will pay for policing our streets & maintaining the prisons needed to contain them when you, their parents & the system fail them? Oh, sorry. All that money has been earmarked to pay off the Bush deficit. Give me a frigging break, will you?"
If I may be so bold:
"you people" eh eh ehhhh,verrrrrry condescending!
"Who will pay for policing our streets & maintaining the prisons needed to contain them" wo, are we speaking of human beings or animals here? Just a bit prejudiced and arrogant, ay?
"All that money has been earmarked to pay off the Bush deficit." Tsk, tsk tsk, sarcasm? Stick to the topic if you can manage your A.D.D. at all.
I would like to know what flavor of kool-aid you enjoy the most, as it is obvious that you have partaken of ALL flavors?
You know what we call people like that,here in Oklahoma?
I work with a former Reuters middle east corr.
I've bookmarked this, and will show him this on Monday for his thoughts.
Appears very unprofessional to me.
Unbelievable! Saying that most of these children would wind up in prison....stupid fascist/socialist/liberal scum. And they're the ones who always do everything "for the children". They can go f themselves!
For those bleating about the "population crisis", I present an excerpt from Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol:
"I see a vacant seat," relied the Ghost, "in the poor chimney corner, and a crutch without an owner, carefully preserved. If these shadows remain unaltered by the Future, the child will die."
"No, no," said Scrooge, "O, no, kind Spirit! say he will be spared."
"If these shadows remain unaltered by the Future, none other of my race," returned the Ghost, "will find him here. What then? If he be like to die, he had better do it, and decrease the surplus population." Scrooge hung his head to hear his own words quoted by the Spirit, and was overcome with penitence and grief.
"Man," said the Ghost, "if man you be in heart, not adamant, forbear that wicked cant until you have discovered What the Surplus is and Where it is. Will you decide what men shall live, what men shall die? It may be that in the sight of heaven, you are more worthless and less fit to live than millions like this poor man's child. O God! to hear the Insect on the leaf pronouncing on the too much life among his hungry brothers in the dust!"
Scrooge bent before the Ghost's rebuke, and trembling, cast his eyes upon the ground.
In the world of the left, no aborted baby was good enough to live... The answer to his question is quite simple, if he'd only allow himself to see it, the added costs would be born by the added productive members born into a just society that values life, all life.
You already got a break Mr. Eastham. You weren't aborted. There are millions who you aren't willing to give that same break to.
I'm not sure the e-mail's actually from Reuters - it didn't blame everything on the Israelis.
Here's another piece of evidence: This is not only a rant in the sense that it's nasty and such, it's a rant because it goes off on a tangent. The text suggests he just was really ticked off to see anything from the NRLC, so he blasted them with general pro-death Malthusian spew rather than addressing the issue on the table. Sure doesn't write like an editor, either.
The editor of our hometown paper of record lost it on the phone with a local pro-lifer the other day, and for even less reason. He even accused said pro-lifer of "harassing" the newsroom secretary, even though she had just sent out a nice thank-you email to the pro-lifer for helping the paper out. Something about the current political/media market situation is driving these folks nuts.
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Never thought of it that way! "We had to burn the village to save it." "We have to kill babies to save society." Yep, pretty similar.
You know what the most interesting thing is? The "village" quote was never said, it was something Peter Arnett made up, but the idea that killing babies will make America great, that's an idea that millions believe as gospel. Yikes!
Well, this is an argument for abortion I haven't heard before: Kill the babies so the government won't have to keep them up. While we're at it, how about killing all the dead-beat liberals so the government won't have to keep THEM up either!
The one thing that never ceases to amaze me , is that the more gruesome the procedure for abortion , the more the left supports it.They have gotten saline abortions and section abortion out of the limelight with this tactic though.
I've heard that phrase a lot lately.
You know the old cliche: He should be grateful his Mom never got an abortion.
Exactly. Imagine the reaction thirty years ago if some politician had said, "hey, I got this great idea for reducing crime and welfare and getting education costs under control: We just kill every third minority baby that's conceived in this country."
He would have been run out of town on a rail, if not worse. Yet that is the primary rationale for abortion among libs today, the semi-honest ones at any rate.
I especially hear a lot of it from doctors and nurses who are involved in delivering the babies of welfare mothers at the local county hospital. "So, doc," they ask "how do you feel about having to support the little ******* for the rest of their lives 'cause their illiterate Catholic mothers won't get an abortion?"
I don't think it will come to that but if it did, and the alternative is killing them, then, I, dammit, will pay. A welfare kid faces a bleak future, but many overcome this and become productive citizens, and you never know which one might be the next Einstein or Mozart.
"Pro-choice" is about racism and class warfare, with black, brown, and poor children as the prime targets. Since the abortion proponents are liberals, however, with the big welfare payoff to dangle in front of their victims, they get a free pass on it.