Yep...and, thanks to their incomparable stupidity, we'll soon be referring to our northern neighbor as "Canadistan."
Posted on 08/28/2004 6:06:12 PM PDT by faludeh_shirazi
Atefeh Rajabi appears to have been a fairly normal 16-year-old: sulky, disobedient, and eager to have sex. In London, those attributes earn lectures from parents and teachers on the importance of acting responsibly and not being offensive. In the city of Neka in Iran, where Atefeh Rajabi comes from, they get you hauled up in front of a judge.
Atefeh's typical teenage behaviour meant that she was charged and found guilty of "acts incompatible with chastity". The judge in the Islamic court ruled that the appropriate penalty was death. That's right: death. Her sentence was confirmed by Iran's Supreme Court.
Two weeks ago, on August 15, the 16-year-old girl was hung from a crane in the main square of Neka, in full public view, in order to keep "society safe from acts against public morality".
Sharia law, the Islamic code which is supposed to govern punishments in Iran, states that unmarried people who have sex should be punished with 100 lashes. That was the chastisement meted out to the single man with whom Atefeh was accused of "committing acts incompatible with chastity".
Married women who have sexual relations with someone who is not their husband should, according to Sharia, be stoned to death - although Iran's chief justice, apparently revolted by the cruelty of pelting women with rocks, ruled two years ago that stonings should be abandoned.
Hanging is not prescribed for either category of transgressor. So what was the judge (one Haji Rezaie) doing sentencing an "unchaste" 16-year-old to hang? He said that she had a "sharp tongue" and had "undressed in court".
It seems that all she did was to take off her headscarf and insist that she was the victim of an older man's advances: but even if she had stripped naked and called the judge a fat ignorant bastard, those actions would hardly merit death, even under Islamic law. Nevertheless, the judge was so outraged that he decided he would personally put the noose round the child's neck.
That disgraceful and disgusting "punishment" has excited a great deal of condemnation in Iran among the reformists. As far as I can see, it has not produced any comment here. Amnesty International issued a statement expressing outrage at the execution (the tenth of a child in Iran since 1990) - but no British newspaper or television station has reported this.
Why not? The two extremes of pro- and anti-Muslim sentiment in Britain are now united in not expecting even the most minimal ethical standards from Islamic countries such as Iran: the pros because they think that Islamic laws should not be criticised for fear of giving offence; the antis because they think all Muslims are just a bunch of irredeemable barbarians.
Those two extreme views have infected media coverage. What would be headline news if it happened in America (can you imagine the response if a 16-year-old girl was executed for having sex in Texas?) is, because it happens in an Islamic state, apparently too banal to count.
That attitude guarantees that more children will suffer Atefeh's fate. Of course, it suits our Government - which is pushing for greater trade links with our new-found ally, Iran - just fine if people think that criticism of Islamic judges is inappropriate because standards are different. But respecting Islam does not require accepting the judicial murder of 16-year-olds (or indeed anyone, of any age) for having sex. That's wrong wherever it happens. We need a Government, and a press, that says so.
FREEDOM FROM THE TERRORISTS!!!!
...which is but one more example of widespread moral bankrupcy in the West.
This is what Canada has just adopted?
Iran Maiden was much better before Bruce Dickinson left. I heard he rejoined the band. Personally, I think Powerslave was probably the best album they put out.
Free Iran and the rest of the Muslim world from the Radical Islamist's reign of terror.
bump
Yep...and, thanks to their incomparable stupidity, we'll soon be referring to our northern neighbor as "Canadistan."
Infinite dreams -- I can't deny them,
Infinity is hard to comprehend ...
ping
Yeah, this story hasn't produced comment in the UK or the US. Our media is too busy with Abu Ghraib, and too busy trying to save John Kerry's sorry backside.
I guess your post is meant to be sarcastic, right? You aren't really being glib about the death of this girl, right?
I was so stunned the other day when I read about this I couldn't even comment on it. I find myself in the same situation today. What can you say when clerics have become so corrupted by their power they are able to do something like this? What do you say, when their fellow clerics allowed this?
Incomprehensible.
> I guess your post is meant to be sarcastic, right?
Maybe he's just a big fan of Old Testament punishments. Stoning until dead was called for for adulterers, I believe.
Which is why we should exterminate Islam from the face of the planet. There isn't a Muslim alive that I trust completely. One can never know what form of Islam they practice, or when they will be summoned to strap on a bomb, or when they might decide to murder a woman in the name of Allah.
Yeah, there are a bunch of punishments like this in the Old Testament. In general, I'm not a fan of them. The other poster seemed to say he found nothing wrong with this sort of thing -- I assume his comment was meant as sarcasm.
I used to love his cereal when I was growing up. Actually Cap'n Crush was better. And since you brought up the subject, when did they change the name from Dig'em Smacks to just Kellogg Smacks? You just can't change the name of a cereal like that....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.