Skip to comments.
Ratification of sea treaty essential
The Sedalia Democrat ^
| Monday, August 30, 2004
| The San Diego Union-Tribune
Posted on 08/30/2004 10:54:10 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: hedgetrimmer; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
21
posted on
08/31/2004 7:07:54 AM PDT
by
farmfriend
( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
To: hedgetrimmer
"The Sedalia Democrat" I thought it was the Sedition Democrat...
22
posted on
08/31/2004 7:08:34 AM PDT
by
boris
(The deadliest weapon of mass destruction in history is a Leftist with a word processor)
To: farmfriend
23
posted on
08/31/2004 7:21:50 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: hedgetrimmer
I would guess this treaty would clear the way for the unelected Marxist UN bureaucrats to also control the various waterways running into the seas.
Anything on that?
To: hedgetrimmer
The proponents of this eminently sensible accord include the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Department of Defense, the State Department, the Commerce Department, the President Bush-appointed U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, every major ocean industry, the National Foreign Trade Council and a slew of environmental groups. Thanks for nothing, again, Republicans.
25
posted on
08/31/2004 7:48:31 AM PDT
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: sergeantdave
We have a designation called the Monterey Basy Sanctuary here on the central coast of CA. It start out with a sphere of influence in 3 counties, it now has a sphere of influence in 6 counties (through the watershed). These areas are ever-expanding, once you allow one to exist.
Because the rivers are controlled through watershed (no dams or reservoirs may be built), the Einsteins around here want to build desalination plants. There are two problems with this, 1 the sanctuary will never allow it because something has to be done with the salt extracted from the water, and 2 if the UN gains control through LOST, then the plant will be controlled by them, its capacity and price of water.
How much of our Country must be lost before Americans will start to resist? Will we resist, or will we fall?
To: sergeantdave
They already do contol them through the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers. Decisions are done by Committee.......just like in the old Soviet Union.
Free America?
27
posted on
08/31/2004 8:19:38 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
(You can evade reality, but you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality - Ayn Rand)
To: hedgetrimmer
We must have property rights. Divide up the oceans--or ocean for those who believe in the one world ocean--and be done with it. Oceans need owners, custodians, curators and they are now ownerless and falling into disrepair and being used by petty criminals like an abandoned warehouse in a slum district.
28
posted on
08/31/2004 9:09:12 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: hedgetrimmer
Sink It
29
posted on
08/31/2004 9:10:18 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: hedgetrimmer
The United Nations authority could impose taxes on oil and natural gas extractions. The power of taxation is the keystone of sovereignty. And so is the power of taxation the cornerstone of corporatism. The United Nothing is not a sovereign entity. It's a bogus organization propped up primarily on the backs of the American taxpayer.
NO on UN sovereignty!!!
NO on LOST!!!
LOST would supercede our Constitution!!!
LOST turns control of American maritime business over to foreign governments within the UN!!!
30
posted on
08/31/2004 10:03:33 AM PDT
by
Robert Drobot
(God, family, country. All else is meaningless.)
To: Robert Drobot
Message to White House, Congress, and RNC:
I hope you are listening and will act rightfully and Constitutionally on this issue.
To: hedgetrimmer
32
posted on
08/31/2004 1:41:28 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(They hang traitors don't they?)
To: hedgetrimmer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson