Posted on 09/03/2004 11:17:03 PM PDT by LiberalBassTurds
Just try and imagine yourself as a Ruskie soldier today finding this scum hiding in the burned out school with childrens bodies all around. There would be no trial or arrest and the world opinion of me be damned. I don't believe we should or would target innocent people, but sometimes you have to make hard decisions. If we KNEW where OBL was for sure, but he had women and children in the same building, would we wait for him to be alone or take out the building? We better take out the building.
Shamil called himself "Brother of Osama Bin Laden"
But I wanted to say that I believe you are correct. Basayev was never trained by the soviets.
Much of what you read is about the hard things in the Russian military. I lived with a general and his family in Moscow for about a month, though, and I think some of it is media bias.
The most important thing are the terrible losses at the hands of chechen scum. What do you think would be a better way for Russia to stop the chechens from the horrors they loose in the world?
I have never read of Basayev being trained by the soviets. What/who is GRU?
GRU = Glavnoye Razvedovatel'noye Upravlenie
Chechen terrorists were made in Afghanistan - by the refuse the CIA left behind. al-Qaeda's origin is at Foggy Bottom not the Kremlin.
This is what was written in newsmax and in other thinktank ragsheets by the neocon thinktanks during the Clinton era:
Chechens were freedom fighters like in the movie "Red Dawn". Serbs are genocidal maniacs. The Bosnian Muslims and Kosovo Muslims are pacifists. The Taliban are maybe a good thing because they will bring order to Afghanistan and take it back from the Russian Northern Alliance who are all drug running warlords and teh Taliban will stomp out the heroin trade.
Fossils stuck in the old cold war way of thinking even try and push the line al-Qaeda and their brand of terror was born in the old USSR and not with Foggy Bottom's partnering with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to wage jihad on the old USSR in Afghanistan.
I guess they can't face the fact that they Medusa like birthed the al-Qaeda monsters.
To whom it may concern:
Blowback - when false information inserted into an enemy's conciousness is circulated through his information gathering channels and is intercepted by friendly intelligence agencies, being inserted into your command/decision making cycle as new and valid information.
When an enemy doesn't like what you did and retaliates, it is called "reprisal" or ...well..."retaliation", which doesn't sound nearly so.....inside, now does it?
Please put the trenchcoat BACK in the closet and step AWAY from the Clancy novels.
Do you read Janes?
http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jir/jir010726_1_n.shtml
26 July 2001
'Blowback'
During the 1980s, resistance fighters in Afghanistan developed a world-wide recruitment and support network with the aid of the USA, Saudi Arabia and other states. After the 1989 Soviet withdrawal, this network, which equipped, trained and funded thousands of Muslim fighters, came under the control of Osama bin Laden. In light of evidence from the recently completed US embassy bombing trials, Phil Hirschkorn, Rohan Gunaratna, Ed Blanche, and Stefan Leader examine the genesis, operational methods and organisational structure of the Bin Laden network: Al-Qaeda.
Al-Qaeda ('The Base') is a conglomerate of groups spread throughout the world operating as a network. It has a global reach, with a presence in Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Turkey, Jordan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Syria, Xinjiang in China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Myanmar, Indonesia, Mindanao in the Philippines, Lebanon, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Yemen, Libya, Tunisia, Bosnia, Kosovo, Chechnya, Dagestan, Kashmir, Sudan, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania, Azerbaijan, Eritrea, Uganda, Ethiopia, and in the West Bank and Gaza.
Since its creation in 1988, Osama bin Laden has controlled Al-Qaeda. As such, he is both the backbone and the principal driving force behind the network. . . .
. . . Vertically, Al-Qaeda is organised with Bin Laden, the emir-general, at the top, followed by other Al-Qaeda leaders and leaders of the constituent groups. Horizontally, it is integrated with 24 constituent groups. The vertical integration is formal, the horizontal integration, informal. Immediately below Bin Laden is the Shura majlis, a consultative council. Four committees - military, religio-legal, finance, and media - report to the majlis. Handpicked members of these committees - especially the military committee - conduct special assignments for Bin Laden and his operational commanders. To preserve operational effectiveness at all levels, compartmentalisation and secrecy are paramount.
While the organisation has evolved considerably since the embassy bombings, the basic structure of the consultative council and the four committees remains intact. Bin Laden's intention to expand his operations has been curbed by the post-bombing security environment, and both Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda have become increasingly clandestine.
Read also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blowback
Blowback is a term used in espionage to describe unintended consequences. In context, it can also mean retaliation as the result of actions undertaken by nations. The phrase is believed to have been coined by the CIA.
In the 1980s, blowback became a central focus of the debate over the Reagan Doctrine, which advocated militarily supporting resistance movements opposing Soviet-supported, communist governments. Critics of the Reagan Doctrine argued that blowback was unavoidable, and that, through the doctrine, the United States was inflaming Third World wars. Conservative advocates, principally at the conservative Heritage Foundation, responded that support for anti-communist resistance movements would lead to a "correlation of forces," which would topple communist regimes without significant retaliatory consequence to the United States, while simultaneously altering the global balance of power in the Cold War.
Given prior CIA support of the Islamic insurgency in Afghanistan and purportedly also of Osama bin Laden, it could be argued that the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack is the most prominent contemporary example of blowback, since some contend that this U.S. support actually helped build Bin Laden as a geopolitical force.
Nope, Jane's is a little too pedestrian for me.
Every once in a while I check to see if they have anything interesting if I'm bored.
Unless you can cite a source with reason to know, from earlier than 1977 or 1978, the definition I posted stands.
Would you like me to tell you how it started, or would you prefer to follow the sheep who follow the sheep who followed the original players who first vocalized the concept?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/190144.asp?cp1=1
NEW YORK, Aug. 24, 1998 At the CIA, it happens often enough to have a code name: Blowback. Simply defined, this is the term that describes an agent, an operative or an operation that has turned on its creators. Osama bin Laden, our new public enemy Number 1, is the personification of blowback. And the fact that he is viewed as a hero by millions in the Islamic world proves again the old adage: Reap what you sow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.