Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor

I think some of the earlier arguments deserved jumping on. This is an expert's opinion, based on actual font samples and not someone's half-baked assertion that typewriters couldn't do that.


Geez, even the most incompetent forger would try to match actual documents from the period.


13 posted on 09/09/2004 1:31:09 PM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

Thanks for enlightening us all. No really, you raised our level of understanding of the issue to a level I personally didn't think could be achieved. You are absolutely vital to this discussion, and you deserve credit for holding CBS to their words. Without your expertise and calm help in sorting out the forgery question, we all would have been lost.

Really. I mean it.


24 posted on 09/09/2004 1:35:14 PM PDT by TastyManatees (http://www.tastymanatees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: js1138

Look, we are in agreement at this point, but how half baked was the assumption about the proportional font being an indicator of forgery in view of the fact that this expert endorses it?


25 posted on 09/09/2004 1:35:43 PM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
This is an expert's opinion, based on actual font samples and not someone's half-baked assertion that typewriters couldn't do that.

At a minimum, CBS should immediately bring forward the document expert they consulted. If this is a forgery, I expect the original source of the documents will have had some flimsy pretext for demanding anonymity, but CBS's own expert is fair game.

45 posted on 09/09/2004 1:45:57 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
Geez, even the most incompetent forger would try to match actual documents from the period.

Agreed. I was defending a couple of posters who actually knew about proportional-font typewriters and were getting slammed for raising legitimate questions. I still think there are some features of the docs that look typed. But gosh, how incompetent must CBS be, to release word-processed documents that purport to date from 1973?

48 posted on 09/09/2004 1:49:15 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor (www.swiftvets.com: where the truth lives on, after 35 years of Kerry lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
Geez, even the most incompetent forger would try to match actual documents from the period.

That was my hesitation as well. The vile Clintonites aren't rank amateurs at fraud and smear by any means. I think your admonitions to slow down regarding this "investigation" were well intended and wise.

54 posted on 09/09/2004 1:51:41 PM PDT by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: js1138

"Geez, even the most incompetent forger would try to match actual documents from the period."


"Geez, even the most incompetent forger would try..." to find a similar typewriter from the period and then make the forgeries.

This whole episode is so insulting to anyone with a minimal level of commonsense.


110 posted on 09/09/2004 6:00:19 PM PDT by torchthemummy (Florida 2000: There Would Have Been No 5-4 Without A 7-2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson