i don't think they were ever vetted at all... i believe SeeBS thought they came form an unimpeachable source so they never bothered to have them checked, period now... just exactly WHO does SeeBS TRUST(and prolly never again)that much???
Posted on 09/10/2004 6:49:33 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
She is
What a catch for some lucky young guy.
Opinionated is NO catch for ANY lucky man. Conservative feminists are just as bad as liberal.
LOL, only if one likes living and talking with an obedient echo chamber.
Was it the first or the second draft?
>> Joe Wilson verified and Sandy Berger delivered them in his socks from the DNC to CBS.
Shortly after you posted this, Laura included Sandy Berger and Jason Blair as possible "verifiers". LOL!
LOL
LOL! Another possible 'verifier' has been exposed at:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1212077/posts
Dan Rather should resign or be fired !!
CBS news should fire Dan Rather for not being absolutely positively certain of the authenticity of these forged documents. We are in the absolute final leg of a Presidential election and Dan Rather rushed to press to get these dociuments on the air because he thought it would potentially help Kerry and hurt Bush. He is blinded by his partisanship and is not fit to be a journalist.
Dan Rather never even looked into where these papers came from. It was his job to be CERTAIN of their authenticity. It's fitting that Rather's career comes to an end under this cloud of his extremist partisanship. He will always be remembered for this. His legacy will be fitting....a reporter who would lie to America if it supported his Left Wing Ideology.
How large is Rather's staff? Does he take "research" from the DNC or their spin-off fronts?
If he's "fed" the "news" is there an inherent bias to keep his handlers in power?
Is there a conflict of interest when your "news" is from people out power? Is there incentive to slant news to get "your guys" back in?
Does Rather have a dog in this fight?
If the DNC is doing Rather's work for him, what are they getting in return? What's the cost? Does CBS pay with their reputation for Rather's "scoops"?
What is the is the coin of the realm for a one-sided "bribe" in the news field? Is it information?
i don't think they were ever vetted at all... i believe SeeBS thought they came form an unimpeachable source so they never bothered to have them checked, period now... just exactly WHO does SeeBS TRUST(and prolly never again)that much???
Right, Danny-boy. You are soooooooooooooo busted... ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.