Posted on 09/11/2004 11:47:19 AM PDT by Cableguy
Here is an animated GIF, alternating between the PDF version of the Microsoft Word document I created, and the CBS News “original.”
Then you have proved just how poor these fakes really are!
Ain't it great! ;-)
Probably due to multiple copying (to make it look old) by the Democrats who gave it to CBS.
ping
It is great, I have linked it to all in my addy folder and to the old media (I must be senile) outlets.
Oh well, there goes Teds "credibility". BWA HA HA HA HA HA!! That punk cost me a ton on TASR stock a few months ago. Him and the NY Times ganged up on it 2 days before it`s earnings report saying it kills people without providing one shred of evidence. The stock fell 20 points after that. Why? Because cops said it was helping them and criminals cried "not fair".
There was a time machine, Al Gore invented it. For verification just ask tipper.(the whale music girl)
That man eats sh*t!
Call FoxNews!
RUSH - DNC, to Kerry campaign, to CBS.
You know what?
They're all the same aren't they?
DNC, Kerry Campaign, and Dan "Regardless about how you feel about him, he's still our President" Rather...
This model has been around since at least 1960. Thus Col. Killian could have used it to go forward to at least the year 2001 and pick up a laptop computer with Windows XP and Word and an HP Laser printer and return back to 1972 to complete these memos.
So obviously the documents could be authentic.
As a matter of fact, I think I saw someone fitting Killian's description in Comp USA last week buying a lap top. Coincidence? I don't think so.
Not to mention the "wayback machine." Anyone could have used it.
Yeah, but this doesn't disprove the allegations in the letter. < /Dan Rather defense >
Indeed
Yes, I noticed that also.
Like others, I entered the same text into MS Word from the " On this date I ordered that ..." document. I stopped after entering the initial two lines to adjust the margins so that the auto return was in the same place as the original.
For each subsequent line the auto return went in exactly between the same words as the original without further adjustment. Could someone at a typewriter using a manual carriage return have coincidentally made the same decisions as the word processor?
The answer is, not likely.
Fabulous!!
This is absolutely convincing. A picture is worth a 1000 words in this case, for sure! The layman can see the FINAL RESULT and NOT get hung up in which font, which superscript type, etc. were and were not avail. in the 70s.
One of the FOX anchorwomen, I think it was Jane Skinner, did it yesterday afternoon. Ran a copy right up using Word.
Imagine if CBS hadn't put the memos on their website for review.
Serves him right. I hope he achieved orgasmic pleasure as the dagger sunk into his back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.