Skip to comments.
BATFE: Revised SAW regs as of Sept. 13, 2004
BATFE online ^
| 9/13/2004
| BATFE
Posted on 09/13/2004 6:53:03 AM PDT by Joe Brower
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: NYRaider
One more of Mr. Clintons legacy's gone.True, true, so true. Now if we could just get back that missile guidance and warhead technology from China. That's going to be a little tough to fight with semi-automatic rifles.
21
posted on
09/13/2004 7:13:26 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
To: Joe Brower
Anyone who illegally possessed, manufactured, or transferred semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices before the bans sunset still have violated the law since their possession, manufacture, or transfer was illegal at the time.Yeah, go ahead and try and prove it BATFags.
To: Joe Brower
Fox News just said, "the ban expires later today."
23
posted on
09/13/2004 7:21:40 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Joe Brower
ANYBODY GOT A BELT-FED .50 CREW SERVED WEAPON FOR SALE? I'M THINKIN' A MA-DUECE, BUT I COULD BE PERSUADED OTHERWISE. OH, AND IT HAS TO BE SEMI-AUTO ONLY...
24
posted on
09/13/2004 7:25:19 AM PDT
by
WorkingClassFilth
(What freakin' frequency are you on, Kenneth...NPR?)
To: isthisnickcool; Cobra64
"So, it did die last night?" Yes. Go to "awbansunset.com" for details.
"Fox News just said, 'the ban expires later today.'"
Fox news is wrong. When it comes to gun issues, they don't do much better than ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc., IMHO.
Also look at the way the leftmedia is raging over this in today's morning papers. It's gone, and they are having epileptic fits over it.
But hey, just to be safe, hang on for another 24 hours. We've waited ten years -- another day isn't going to matter much.
25
posted on
09/13/2004 7:29:37 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Travis McGee
This is probably just scare-language from the Clintonista holdovers in the BATFE, of which there are many, as we know.
I'd really like to know how they intend to prove such a thing. Of course, they don't have to in order to make your life miserable regardless.
Neat how it works, isn't it?
26
posted on
09/13/2004 7:31:09 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: TigersEye
That's going to be a little tough to fight with semi-automatic riflesEven MORE challenging with spitballs from Kerry's Pentagon priorities...
27
posted on
09/13/2004 7:44:24 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: Joe Brower
This also jumped out at me:
Former law enforcement officers who received semiautomatic assault weapons on retirement may now transfer those firearms to persons who are not prohibited from receiving firearms.
Since when are retired LEOs receiving semiautos on retirement? News to me. Why?
28
posted on
09/13/2004 7:45:09 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Travis McGee
Anyone who illegally possessed, manufactured, or transferred semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices before the bans sunset still have violated the law since their possession, manufacture, or transfer was illegal at the time.
Thus, anyone currently possessing what yesterday was illegal would be well advised to arrange a sales transaction with a paper trail showing it is newly acquired today. (And I sure hope it had been purchased in a private sale, and not from a dealer with all the ATF paperwork.)
29
posted on
09/13/2004 7:45:35 AM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: WorkingClassFilth
ANYBODY GOT A BELT-FED .50 CREW SERVED WEAPON FOR SALE? I'M THINKIN' A MA-DUECE, BUT I COULD BE PERSUADED OTHERWISE. OH, AND IT HAS TO BE SEMI-AUTO ONLY...
http://tnwfirearms.com/
30
posted on
09/13/2004 7:47:11 AM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Joe Brower
There are no longer any marking requirements for semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices. Existing markings on firearms and magazines relating to law enforcement or government use may be disregarded.I'll bet that before the gun shows are over this weekend, some stupid and/or lying/greedy gun dealer will try to say that the LEO marked mags are still illegal to sell to private individuals (but he could sell you these genuine pre-ban mags for twice the going rate).
31
posted on
09/13/2004 7:52:57 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Travis McGee
News to me too. Maybe they're talking about those fancy gold-inlaid laser-engraved too-pretty-to-shoot things that you see for sale in "American Rifleman". $;-)
32
posted on
09/13/2004 8:00:22 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Joe Brower
33
posted on
09/13/2004 8:04:38 AM PDT
by
in the Arena
(James Wayne Herrick, Jr. Captain/US Air Force - MIA - Laos - 27 October 1969)
To: .38sw
Unfortunately, Boxer will be around for another six years. How old is she getting to be? Maybe there is hope after all.
To: Joe Brower
Anyone who illegally possessed, manufactured, or transferred semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices before the bans sunset still have violated the law since their possession, manufacture, or transfer was illegal at the time. Amazing. If you had it when it was legal, and they make it illegal, then that is a crime. If you had it while it was illegal, and then they make it legal, then THAT is still a crime.
Anyone see any problems with this kinda logic?
35
posted on
09/13/2004 8:15:12 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Travis McGee
My order from Bushmaster is already shipped in UPS tracking says it will arrive Wednesday. YEEHAW!
36
posted on
09/13/2004 8:15:41 AM PDT
by
RKV
(RKV (He who has the guns, makes the rules))
To: Joe Brower; All
Fox news is wrong. When it comes to gun issues, they don't do much better than ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc., IMHO. Also look at the way the leftmedia is raging over this in today's morning papers. It's gone, and they are having epileptic fits over it.
Just saw Fox broadcasting another of Lurch's lies. HorseFace was accusing Bush of not passing an extension of the AWB. Well, it seems that Congress did not put a Bill on his desk for him to even sign!!!
I am going to send emails to Fox, Rush and Sean mentioning this little 'detail'. Hope some of you would start a new thread mentioning this. (I don't know how to post a thread).
37
posted on
09/13/2004 8:27:31 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Joe Brower
I couldn't get the link to work. It just says the document is not available on this server...
38
posted on
09/13/2004 8:28:11 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(Rant this day, in remembrance.)
To: Smokin' Joe
Just right click on the link at the upper left, click on 'save target as', and you are good to go!
39
posted on
09/13/2004 8:30:21 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(Rant this day, in remembrance.)
To: Joe Brower
The Second Amendment...
America's
Original Homeland Security!
Be Ever Vigilant!
40
posted on
09/13/2004 8:37:21 AM PDT
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson