Skip to comments.
BATFE: Revised SAW regs as of Sept. 13, 2004
BATFE online ^
| 9/13/2004
| BATFE
Posted on 09/13/2004 6:53:03 AM PDT by Joe Brower
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: Joe Brower
I don't want to be a party pooper, but the statement has been pulled from the front page of the ATF website and the pdf document version removed from the server.
To: Smokin' Joe; All
"I couldn't get the link to work. It just says the document is not available on this server..." You are correct -- I just verified this myself. It appears that the file has been pulled from the site. Hmmmmm...!
In any case, it was working this morning, and at that time I archived the file to my local hard disk. In the interest of serving the public good, I now have made this document available to everyone from my own website.
Click the link below, and if you have Acrobat Reader installed in your browser, it will load there. If you want to right-click and "Save as", that will work too.
Have at it, me buckos!
CHANGES IN FEDERAL LAW AS OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 RELATING TO SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS (SAWs).
42
posted on
09/13/2004 8:48:03 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Ronaldus Magnus
See post #42.
43
posted on
09/13/2004 8:48:53 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Joe Brower
Thank you for your archive. They seem to be cleaning their web site as we write this. So far the statement has been removed from their front page and these pages have been removed:
As I write this, only this one is still up:
Looks like we have some Big Brother revisionism going on.
To: Joe Brower
BATFE: Revised SAW regs as of Sept. 13, 2004 Damn, for a moment I thought the BATFE was going to let me buy a Squad Automatic Weapon without Class III paperwork.
To: Beelzebubba
Should I type that or just dummy it up in Word?
46
posted on
09/13/2004 9:01:48 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The world awaits the day when the ranks of the unemployed are all retired warriors.)
To: Joe Brower
Thanks, Joe. I got it (see post #39). If it is there, we will find a way...
47
posted on
09/13/2004 9:14:30 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(Rant this day, in remembrance.)
To: RogueIsland
Heck, even a semi-auto only conversion would be nice.
48
posted on
09/13/2004 9:15:58 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Joe Brower
49
posted on
09/13/2004 9:24:05 AM PDT
by
Area51
(Diapers and Politicians need to be changed-For the same reason)
To: OXENinFLA
2nd Amendment...
THANKS FOR THE PING
50
posted on
09/13/2004 9:37:05 AM PDT
by
Smartass
(BUSH & CHENEY 2004 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
To: ninenot
Even MORE challenging with spitballs from Kerry's Pentagon priorities... Yes and first you will have to find a Frenchman willing to shoot spitballs with you.
51
posted on
09/13/2004 9:41:43 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
To: Joe Brower; All
Hey, how about a little tear for those poor souls in California. Per state law, still can't possess a semi-auto rifle with ONE evil feature and full capacity mags are still banned.
(But Californians are still happy for everyone who lives in a normal state. Enjoy your toys!)
52
posted on
09/13/2004 9:55:20 AM PDT
by
ibbryn
(this tag intentionally left blank)
To: Vic3O3
It may be gone, but the anti's haven't forgotten.
Nor, might I add, has the DOJ, BTAFE or FBI. They still want your guns in the slag pot and you in "re-education"...
Enjoy.
53
posted on
09/14/2004 7:01:39 AM PDT
by
cavtrooper21
("Why walk when you can RIDE!!" The "real" Cavalry motto.........)
To: Joe Brower
"USAS-12 and Striker12/Streetsweeper shotguns are still classified as destructive devices under ATF Rulings 94-1 and 94-2..."Im missing something here. What actually is an "ATF Ruling"? Are they admitting that they just make crap up?
To: gnarledmaw
We'll, we all know the unelected beaurucrats at the BATFE will never admit anything.
But, yes.
55
posted on
09/15/2004 7:21:02 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
To: Joe Brower
I was on honeymoon so I'm late with this bump.
BTTT!
56
posted on
09/27/2004 4:31:18 PM PDT
by
hattend
(I'm on the Mark Steyn Ping List! I'm somebody!)
To: hattend
Well, congratulations, hattend. Speaking for myself, getting hitched was the best thing that happened to me!
As you can see, good things were happening while you were away!
57
posted on
09/28/2004 3:59:07 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
(The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
