Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Rather, Terry McAuliffe and those phony papers [Dems say their plot is working]
The Hill ^ | 9/15/04 | BYRON YORK

Posted on 09/15/2004 4:44:25 PM PDT by Brilliant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 09/15/2004 4:44:28 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Bush has overtaken Kerry in NJ in the midst of their brilliant plot.


2 posted on 09/15/2004 4:45:41 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

You know it takes time to produce something like this. I wonder when production was started on this ad?


3 posted on 09/15/2004 4:46:59 PM PDT by stockpirate (Kerry; supported by, financed by, trained by, guided by, revered by, in favor of, Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

About the same time the papers were forged.


4 posted on 09/15/2004 4:48:20 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I don't understand the DNC talking heads saying the SBVT's published lies. Nothing published by the Swifties has been retracted...has it? In fact, since their book came out, it is Kerry and his group that has had to do the "explaining." So, why is it the Kerry campaign threatens to sue media outlets saying they are promoting "slander" if they publish any of the Swifty info,,,yet, they are not even threatening to sue the Swifties? I am so tired of these Dem mouthpieces saying the Swiftboat book is garbage and lies,,,I say,,,prove it!

I think the Swifties should consider legal action against anyone who slanders their book without proof!!!

Sorry if a little off topic, they were mentioned in the post.


5 posted on 09/15/2004 4:48:32 PM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I demand Kerry come clean and sign the 180 form to release his service records!!!


6 posted on 09/15/2004 4:49:03 PM PDT by avant_garde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

It is time to really turn up the heat... The swiftboat vets need to hold a rally...


7 posted on 09/15/2004 4:49:46 PM PDT by tomnbeverly (Do not let the UN make decisions for the protection of the United States... VOTE for George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

"The CBS memos are forgeries? Who cares? They did the job. "

Yes, that is all they care about. If a lie will do it, and the truth will not, then the LIE is preferred.

This is brazen; it is "out there". We cannot allow it to succeed. Not that I think it will, but the result they face should be more than a "back-lash". It needs to be a melt-down so complete that they know WHY they lost.


8 posted on 09/15/2004 4:50:21 PM PDT by AMDG&BVMH (Proudly served in the National Guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

and a new poll shows President Bush gaining the the great state of IL.


9 posted on 09/15/2004 4:51:26 PM PDT by man from mars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
“I do think it’s working,” top DNC official Howard Wolfson said Tuesday when asked about the Democratic attack on Bush’s service. “There was a Newsweek poll that came out this week that showed that the president lost 10 points in his credibility numbers in one week since these issues about his service began.”

Bush and he people better wake up, there should be an investigation by the Justice Department over these fakes.
10 posted on 09/15/2004 4:51:59 PM PDT by stockpirate (Kerry; supported by, financed by, trained by, guided by, revered by, in favor of, Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: man from mars
Re#9 Survey USA shows W leading New Jersey too...
11 posted on 09/15/2004 4:52:53 PM PDT by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
I don't understand the DNC talking heads saying the SBVT's published lies. Nothing published by the Swifties has been retracted...has it?

I don't understand why, when the RATS say the Swiftie statements are lies, no one bats them down! It is infuriating to hear this over and over, and no one that I see or hear has the guts to stop the lying RATS in their cheesy tracks and call them on it. Kerry hasn't read the book but knows they're lies. Really? He must be omniscient. By the way, did you know Kerry was in Vietnam? Pass it on!

12 posted on 09/15/2004 4:53:26 PM PDT by Use It Or Lose It (Dan Rather is headed toward the IBM Selectric Chair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Has he really lost 10% in credibility in that poll?


13 posted on 09/15/2004 4:54:16 PM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The conventional wisdom is that the latest attack on Bush — the one-two punch of the CBS report and McAuliffe’s offensive — is the result of the devastatingly effective anti-Kerry ads aired by the group Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

But it was going on before that.

That is what I have been saying. I have pointed out this was NOT in answer to the Swift Vets.

The Kerry Kamp is still complicit, being associated with the DNC and Kerry's propensity to bash Bush in this area personally.

Congressional hearings are needed.

14 posted on 09/15/2004 4:56:45 PM PDT by cyncooper (We're mad as Zell and we're not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
That’s the address of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), where on Tuesday DNC chairman Terry McAuliffe called in the press to unveil what he called “Operation: Fortunate Son.”

What a coincidence! They just happened to be ready to take advantage of CBS 60 Minutes II's journalistic coup on the National Guard story with Ben Barnes and a new set of bombshell documents, had an ad all produced and everything warmed up on the runway, so to speak.

That couldn't have anything to do with why CBS is having trouble realizing the memos are

FAKED AS HELL,

could it?
15 posted on 09/15/2004 4:57:11 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinaero
I don't understand the DNC talking heads saying the SBVT's published lies.

DNC (and CBS) lies and projects this onto good and decent folk. Not off-topic.

16 posted on 09/15/2004 4:58:08 PM PDT by cyncooper (We're mad as Zell and we're not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Are you unaware of the Congressional letters and calls for hearings that were put out today?

It is not bluster or idle talk.


17 posted on 09/15/2004 4:59:50 PM PDT by cyncooper (We're mad as Zell and we're not going to take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

"... there should be an investigation by the Justice Department over these fakes."


It needs to be framed as collusion between the Network and the DNC as a fraud perpetrated on the electorate. I wonder, Sarbanes-Oxley or Campaign Finance Reform violations?

But not by the Justice Department, they'd be screaming ASHCROFT the Boogeyman again. Who else could bring it?


18 posted on 09/15/2004 4:59:50 PM PDT by OpusatFR (Let me repeat this: the web means never having to swallow leftist garbage again. Got it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
In “Fortunate Son,” Democrats included clips from the discredited CBS broadcast after it had been discredited. The DNC is simply pretending that didn’t happen.

Nah! They wouldn't do that.

;)

19 posted on 09/15/2004 5:00:34 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
These docs have only slightly more credibility than the charges that he did cocaine in the WH in the 90's. Remember the weeks of press obsession with getting him to confess to something that: there were no witnesses for, there were no accusers, there was no evidence, there was not even an allegation from any single person.

At least in this case, they forged somebodies name on the allegation. That's a step up for the MSM in this election.

20 posted on 09/15/2004 5:01:07 PM PDT by bpjam (I don't know what a neo-con is and neither does anybody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson