everything she said she could have learned and been inspired by from the weekend talk shows and DNC/CBS talking points spun there.
IMO the interesting thing is if the Houston Chronicle interviewed her last week and their description of her remarks about Bush then were accurate.
She gave the Houston Chronicle two interviews, one on September 14 and the other in the week before. In the first she said she had no real personal knowledge of Bush's situation; in the second she gave extensive derogatory comments about Bush that essentially track what she said to Rather.
In between the two she obviously received "memory restoration therapy" from either CBS or the DNC. So it turns out that CBS and the DNC are using forged documents to implant fake memories in a witness who remembered almost nothing about Bush's service, and then using those faked memories to corrorobate the contents of the same forged documents that were used to "restore" her memories in the first place.