Skip to comments.
Putin Accuses West, Chechen Rebel Vows More Attacks
Reuters via Yahoo! ^
| Jonathan Thatcher
Posted on 09/17/2004 1:19:51 PM PDT by Teacher317
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Go Putin, go!
To: Teacher317
I hope by "West", Putin's referring to "Old Europe" and not us.
2
posted on
09/17/2004 1:22:18 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: DannyTN
September 17, 2004 MOSCOW (AP) - President Vladimir Putin said Friday that Russia is "seriously preparing" for pre-emptive strikes against terrorists, while Chechen insurgent leader Shamil Basayev claimed responsibility for a school hostage-taking and other attacks that have claimed more than 430 lives. Speaking to a meeting of world mayors in Moscow, Putin also made a veiled attack on the West, saying that double standards in dealing with terrorism are "disastrous for global security." Putin didn't name any specific countries, but his comments appeared aimed at European and U.S. officials who have urged Moscow to conduct peace talks with Chechen rebels. "There continue to be attempts to divide terrorists into ours and others, into moderates and radicals," Putin said in televised remarks. "All this is a condescending, justifying attitude to murderers, which amounts to being an accomplice to terrorism." Putin firmly ruled out any "bargaining" with the Chechen rebels. "Every concession leads to aggression, a widening of their demands and multiplies the losses," he said. The president said that "now in Russia, we are seriously preparing to act preventively against terrorists," adding such action would be "in strict accordance with the law and norms of the constitution, norms of international law." Putin didn't elaborate, and it wasn't immediately clear whether he was referring to action against terrorists only at home or abroad as well. Other Russian officials, including Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov, have said that Russia could conduct pre-emptive strikes against terrorists abroad, saying such action could involve any weapons except nuclear. The main Chechen rebel website, Kavkaz-Centre, posted on Friday what it said was an e-mail from Basayev, claiming his Riyadus Salikhin Martyrs' Brigade was responsible for the bombings of two Russian passenger jets last month, a suicide bombing outside a Moscow subway station and the school siege in the southern city of Beslan. More than 430 people were killed in the attacks, including 338 at the school, where the Sept. 1-3 hostage standoff ended in a hail of gunfire and explosions. The lengthy e-mail, signed with Basayev's nom de guerre, Abdallakh Shamil, defended the attacks as part of the Chechen war for independence against Russia. It also sought to shift blame for the massacre to Russian forces. Putin and other officials have said they had not planned to storm the school, where the attackers had rigged bombs amid the 1,200 hostages, many of them children. According to Russian officials and witnesses, after explosions rocked the school and armed volunteers started shooting, Russian special forces opened fire, too.
3
posted on
09/17/2004 1:24:20 PM PDT
by
Truth666
To: Teacher317
So why is he selling nuclear technology to Iran?
4
posted on
09/17/2004 1:24:43 PM PDT
by
Voltage
To: Teacher317
"Moreover, we faced double standards in the attitude toward terrorism," he said
Yeah, Putin, we recall your many faces when we needed your support in Iraq.
5
posted on
09/17/2004 1:24:48 PM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(I'm voting with our soldiers.)
To: Teacher317
"A patronizing and indulgent attitude to the murderers amounts to complicity in terror"
I dont think I disagree.
6
posted on
09/17/2004 1:25:24 PM PDT
by
jbstrick
(War is not fought for peace. War is fought for victory.)
To: Voltage
So why is he selling nuclear technology to Iran?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
7
posted on
09/17/2004 1:26:09 PM PDT
by
DAC22
To: Voltage
So why does he support Hamas and other Arab terrorists?
8
posted on
09/17/2004 1:27:17 PM PDT
by
BobCNY
To: DannyTN
I hope by "West", Putin's referring to "Old Europe" and not us. I guess it depends on which he's facing...
9
posted on
09/17/2004 1:29:42 PM PDT
by
danneskjold
(All balloons, what the hell! There's nothing falling! What the f%#@ are you guys doing up there?)
To: DannyTN
10
posted on
09/17/2004 1:31:43 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Kill all Islamic terrorists now. Then they cannot kill our sons and daughters tomorrow)
To: Voltage
So why is he selling nuclear technology to Iran?
Facts available to anyone
Putin hasn't let any other country get the bomb.
Islam has now the bomb (Pakistan) thanks to Clinton. Facts - classified
The only reason Russia didn't strike Pakistan yet is the opposition of the West.
Russia lauched a pre-emptive strike against North Korea.
11
posted on
09/17/2004 1:33:19 PM PDT
by
Truth666
To: Truth666
aimed at European and U.S. officials who have urged Moscow to conduct peace talks with Chechen rebels.
Our State Dept. SUCKS....
12
posted on
09/17/2004 1:40:56 PM PDT
by
StrictTime
("Pajama Riot! I wanna riot! Pajama Riot! A riot of my own!")
To: DannyTN
I hope by "West", Putin's referring to "Old Europe" and not us. I hope so too, but our state department should be cooperative with Russia, we help them in Chechnya they help us in Iraq.
13
posted on
09/17/2004 1:43:25 PM PDT
by
JPJones
("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
To: JPJones
I don't think they are going to help us in Iraq. Putin is being hypocritical. He criticizes us for going to war with Iraq, and he expects us to support him in Chechnya? He wants to go after the Islamists there, but supports Iran with nuclear technology? Sorry, Crazy Vlad, we don't work that way, particularly when the Chechyns have real grievances against Russia (doesn't justify the killing of hundreds of children, but thousands of civilians have died in Chechnya since the days of Stalin)
14
posted on
09/17/2004 1:49:05 PM PDT
by
Pyro7480
(Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
To: StrictTime
The individuals who populate our state department consist of political hacks getting lucrative posts in countries they know nothing about, and the ignorant toadies and lackies who become servants of the nations in which they are stationed, rather than the agents of America.
The entire State Department, from Powell on down stinks and has done a miserable job in negotiating with the thugs in the U.N. pre-Invasion, and in supporting our fighting troops in field in the Middle East.
The Chechens are professional theifs, Islamic mafiosi and terrorists. Chechnya and the Chechnyans should be wiped out.
15
posted on
09/17/2004 1:51:18 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: JPJones
Exactly.
But don't count on the Cretins in the U.S. State Department to see the logic of this themselves.
Intelligence is a virtue they lack. They must be ORDERED to do this, and removed if they interfere.
16
posted on
09/17/2004 1:52:32 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: Pyro7480
He wants to go after the Islamists there, but supports Iran with nuclear technology?
Putin doesn't sell any technology that could lead Iran to the bomb.
Just think about this :
Israel is NOW the main ally of Russia in the region. Do you think that would be possible if Russia was jeopardizing Israel's security ?
17
posted on
09/17/2004 1:53:00 PM PDT
by
Truth666
To: Truth666
I forgot about that. It's a rather recent development though.
18
posted on
09/17/2004 1:57:04 PM PDT
by
Pyro7480
(Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
To: ZULU
Here's to Bush winning a second term and perhaps doing a little housecleaning...
/wishful thinking
19
posted on
09/17/2004 1:58:28 PM PDT
by
StrictTime
("Pajama Riot! I wanna riot! Pajama Riot! A riot of my own!")
To: Truth666
The train blast? or the dam project?
>>Russia lauched a pre-emptive strike against North Korea.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson