Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS defense of Rather hints at bigger story [Freeper Buckhead Scoops Rather!]
SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST ^ | September 19, 2004 | MARK STEYN

Posted on 09/18/2004 2:41:25 AM PDT by elhombrelibre

CBS defense of Rather hints at bigger story

September 19, 2004

BY MARK STEYN SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

Of all the loopy statements made by Dan Rather in the 10 days since he decided to throw his career away, my favorite is this, from Dan's interview with the Washington Post on Thursday:

''If the documents are not what we were led to believe, I'd like to break that story.''

Hel-looooo? Earth to the Lost Planet of Ratheria: You can't ''break that story.'' A guy called ''Buckhead'' did that, on the Free Republic Web site a couple of hours after you and your money-no-object resources-a-go-go ''60 Minutes'' crew attempted to pass off four obvious Microsoft Word documents as authentic 1972 typewritten memos about Bush's skipping latrine duty in the Spanish-American War, or whatever it was.

The following day Charles Johnson of the Little Green Footballs Web site drove a stake through your phony '70s memos by overlaying them with modern MS Word documents, whose automatic word wrap is amazingly an exact match with Lt. Col. Killian's ''typewriter.'' And every document expert agreed with Johnson your memos are junk, including your own analysts.

By now just about everybody on the planet also thinks they're junk, except for that dwindling number of misguided people who watch the ''CBS Evening News'' under the misapprehension that it's a news broadcast rather than a new unreality show in which a cocooned anchor, his floundering news division and some feeble executives are trapped on their own isle of delusion and can't figure out a way to vote themselves off it.

So the only story you're in a position to break right now is: ''Late-Breaking News. Veteran Newsman Announces He's Recovered His Marbles.'' And, if last week's anything to go by, you're in no hurry to do that.

Instead, Dan keeps demanding Bush respond to the ''serious questions'' raised by his fake memos. ''With respect, Mr. President,'' he droned the other day, ''answer the questions.'' The president would love to, but he's doubled up with laughter.

I was prepared to cut the poor old buffoon some slack a week ago. But Dan's performance has grown progressively more outrageous, to the point where it's hard not to conclude he's colluding in the perpetuation of a massive if ludicrous fraud. Dan's been play-acting at being a reporter for so many years now -- the suspenders, the loosened tie, and all the other stuff that would look great if he were auditioning for a cheesy dinner-theater revival of ''The Front Page''; the over-the-top intros: ''Bob Schieffer, one of the best hard-nosed reporters in the business, has been working his sources. What have you managed to uncover for us, Bob?'', after which Bob reads out a DNC press release. Dan's been doing all this so long he doesn't seem to realize the news isn't just a show.

Round about the middle of last week, he was reduced to shoring up his collapsing fantasy with Bill Glennon, a Cliff Claven figure who was a typewriter repairman in the '70s. But, because every other CBS expert had abandoned Dan's sunk ship, Bill suddenly found himself upgraded to ''document expert.'' This guy's been insisting that you could produce Dan's bogus memos on a 1972 IBM typewriter: ''The Model D had a lever that when pushed put a rubber stopper in front of the keys so they did not strike the paper. You centered the paper using the paper scale, put the carriage on the middle mark of the front index scale, typed your heading and then made note of the number it stopped on. You then moved the carriage back to the corresponding number on the left side of the index scale and retyped your heading and . . .''

Yeah, right. Every time I want to type a memo saying Bush is unfit to be president, that's what I do, too. Look, if Dan thinks this guy's theory is correct, let's put him and his IBM Model D and me and my computer in a room at CBS News for an hour and see which one of us emerges with the closest replicas of these four documents. I'll give him ten thousand bucks for every memo he reproduces exactly, and round it up to an even 50 grand if he gets all four right.

Any takers, CBS?

So the question now is why won't Dan and Co. just admit their docs are crocks and let it go? On Wednesday, CBS News head honcho Andrew Heyward, in a slippery statement, announced that ''we established to our satisfaction that the memos were accurate.'' Note that word: not ''genuine'' but ''accurate'' -- i.e., if Lt. Col. Killian had had one of those IBM Model Ds and been willing to remove the carriage return and replace it with a rubber stopper on the front index scale while turning the crank, etc., these are the memos he would have written. Rather and Heyward are adopting the rogue-cop defense: The evidence is planted, but the guy's still guilty. Or as the New York Times' headline put it: ''Memos On Bush Are Fake But Accurate.''

Why has CBS News decided it would rather debauch its brand and treat its audience like morons than simply admit their hoax? For Dan Rather? I doubt it. Hurricane Dan looks like he's been hit by one. He's still standing, just about, but, like a battered double-wide, more and more panels are falling off every day. No one would destroy three-quarters of a century of audience trust and goodwill for one shattered anachronism of an anchorman, would they?

As the network put it last week, ''In accordance with longstanding journalistic ethics, CBS News is not prepared to reveal its confidential sources or the method by which '60 Minutes' Wednesday received the documents.'' But, once they admit the documents are fake, they can no longer claim ''journalistic ethics'' as an excuse to protect their source. There's no legal or First Amendment protection afforded to a man who peddles a fraud. You'd think CBS would be mad as hell to find whoever it was who stitched them up and made them look idiots.

So why aren't they? The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

Whatever other lessons are drawn from this, we ought at least to acknowledge that the privileged position accorded to ''official'' media and the restrictions placed on the citizenry by McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform are wholly unwarranted.

As for Heyward and Rather, the other day I came across a rare memo from April 20, 1653, typed on a 17th century prototype of the IBM Selectric. It's Oliver Cromwell's words to England's Long Parliament:

''You have sat too long for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!''


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; cbs; cbsnews; danrather; marksteyn; rather; rathergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-168 last
To: muir_redwoods

"A thousand years from now, "rather" might be a common lower-case noun for a pompous incompetent who misses some obvious flaw in his plans."

I sorta like "ratheresque" and I'm not waiting 1000 years to use it.


151 posted on 09/18/2004 7:34:45 AM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
Hehe. Steyn gets right to the point, either spoken or written. I'd like to hear him more often than once a week.

Anyway, we are in the 2nd stage of CBS's downfall. People are laughing at them. Jay Leno said CBS stands for Cock & Bull Story.

152 posted on 09/18/2004 7:46:31 AM PDT by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: igoramus987
Burkett is almost definitely the source, but the bigger problem facing CBS is concealment of the DNC as the intermediary.

As proved by the material quoted in both the NYT and WaPost today, Burkett has proved himself a loose cannon who can't be trusted not to rat on the DNC (either deliberately or inadvertently), which leaves this in limbo until or if the Burkett "problem" somehow disappears...you've got to wonder how many Dem "minders" have their eyes and ears intensely focused on that ranch near Abilene.

If I were Burkett, I'd be very paranoid right now.

153 posted on 09/18/2004 7:48:11 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All

If Rather fails in his feeble attempt to prove THESE documents "accurate",what is he going to do with the follow-up story? He probably has "sources" for W's drug habit, abuse of women, taking candy from babies, kicking of dogs, forgetting mother's day,etc.....
This "story" MUST be true if he is to break the BIGGER story!
Now whats he going to do with all those other documents?


154 posted on 09/18/2004 7:51:38 AM PDT by Bob from De (While GWB was flying TANG F-102s, JFK was under FBI surveillance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

I don't know if Steyn's piece is the source of her news, but Monica Crowley on WABC isn't taking calls on rathergate this morning. She said she'll do it tomorrow and that the story is much bigger than what is being reported.


155 posted on 09/18/2004 7:54:12 AM PDT by xkaydet65 (" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebTalk
"A thousand years from now, "rather" might be a common lower-case noun for a pompous incompetent who misses some obvious flaw in his plans." Sooner than that the verb "rathered" will apply to fraudulant representations of past events. Example: Kerry rathered his Vietnam war record.

That is priceless! I am going to start using that now. Please mark this post as the genesis of this addition to our lexicon. It will go fine with Dan Rather was finally Munsoned!

156 posted on 09/18/2004 7:55:49 AM PDT by Zebra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Bump for another Steyn classic.

By now just about everybody on the planet also thinks they're junk, except for that dwindling number of misguided people who watch the ''CBS Evening News'' under the misapprehension that it's a news broadcast rather than a new unreality show in which a cocooned anchor, his floundering news division and some feeble executives are trapped on their own isle of delusion and can't figure out a way to vote themselves off it.

ROTFLMAO. Priceless.

Thanks, elhombrelibre.

157 posted on 09/18/2004 8:00:27 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (--Your message could post here--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

The story isn't whether the documents' contents are true or false, but that they were forged with the intent to deceive the public. Even if Dan has a hundred credible documents negative towards Bush, the fact remains that the ones he presented to us were bogus. His goal was to create negative news about the president to bring him down. Had not Buckhead did what he did, it is likely that Bush wouldn't have had time to shake the charges by election time. What CBS did was try to change the entire political atmosphere with one stroke of the brush! Disgraceful!


158 posted on 09/18/2004 8:06:52 AM PDT by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

"The Docs are croc -- well said!"


159 posted on 09/18/2004 8:23:44 AM PDT by Ciexyz ("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre; Buckhead

Pinging buckhead....


160 posted on 09/18/2004 8:30:12 AM PDT by lormand (I've got your "poll" right here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Dan Rather is now the Ted Baxter of CBS - without the quiet dignity


(Thanks Ann Coulter for that descritpion)


161 posted on 09/18/2004 8:39:41 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

The CBS producer hinted that there is "more to come". In a phone call on Thursday morning, Mary Mapes called Seattle's KVI 570 talk radio host John Carlson. Her call was in response to his comments in a Wall Street Journal article about Mrs. Mapes. John previously worked with Mary at KIRO TV News in Seattle in the early '90's.

According to John Carlson during his show on Thursday, Mary Mapes had called Mr. Carlson that morning to discuss the article, talk about the CBS Guard story, and about her father, Dennis Mapes. There were confidential words exchanged and there was public information that John was at liberty to share. And share he did that Mary had heard that her (conservative) father had called into John's radio show to share his sadness for how his liberal daughter went astray. And when John asked her about the fake documents she dodged the question. Then insisted that there is more to the (CBS Guard memo) story that needs to be told and will be told.

The John Carlson Show is available online. Go to:
http://www.kvi.com/x2977.xml?ParentPageID=x3155&ContentID=x7086&Layout=KVI.xsl&AdGroupID=x3500


162 posted on 09/18/2004 8:46:08 AM PDT by American Sovereignty Defender (I'm voting FOR Bush - before voting AGAINST Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Well //////////////

f. them, SeeBS will NOT pull it off!

163 posted on 09/18/2004 10:53:30 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza - let them run around naked, at least the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: igoramus987

I hear you!


164 posted on 09/18/2004 10:55:03 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza - let them run around naked, at least the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Thank you!


165 posted on 09/18/2004 11:01:36 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza - let them run around naked, at least the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

Rather is already a word. The only way to make it stick is to make it distictive. ratherish, ratherite, rathered, rathidence (rather evidence), *rathero* (rather memo - I like the way that one looks.)


166 posted on 09/18/2004 11:06:12 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan

That is what I'm waiting for.


167 posted on 09/18/2004 11:15:31 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=762&e=1&u=/ap/20040926/ap_en_tv/tv_cbs_fallout

Viewership for the "CBS Evening News" during the week the Sept. 8 "60 Minutes" report on Bush's service was aired was down 8 percent from the same week in 2003, according to Nielsen Media Research. The next week, it was down 9 percent. ... "CBS Evening News" ratings are falling faster this year than either of its competitors. CBS is already a distant third to NBC and ABC, and the gap is getting wider.

... Privately, there's considerable sentiment that "the time has passed" for change, as one manager said.

"They need to phase Dan out in the most compassionate and appropriate way they can," said another executive.

"I don't think there's a connection there between him and the viewers we want any more," said a third. "I think the show needs an overhaul and generally what comes with an overhaul is a new face."


168 posted on 09/26/2004 1:34:58 PM PDT by Bryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-168 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson