Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 09/18/2004 7:33:04 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:


Skip to comments.

CBS defense of Rather hints at bigger story
Chicago Sun Times ^ | September 19 2004 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 09/18/2004 7:09:17 AM PDT by Pitiricus

Of all the loopy statements made by Dan Rather in the 10 days since he decided to throw his career away, my favorite is this, from Dan's interview with the Washington Post on Thursday:

''If the documents are not what we were led to believe, I'd like to break that story.''

Hel-looooo? Earth to the Lost Planet of Ratheria: You can't ''break that story.'' A guy called ''Buckhead'' did that, on the Free Republic Web site a couple of hours after you and your money-no-object resources-a-go-go ''60 Minutes'' crew attempted to pass off four obvious Microsoft Word documents as authentic 1972 typewritten memos about Bush's skipping latrine duty in the Spanish-American War, or whatever it was.

The following day Charles Johnson of the Little Green Footballs Web site drove a stake through your phony '70s memos by overlaying them with modern MS Word documents, whose automatic word wrap is amazingly an exact match with Lt. Col. Killian's ''typewriter.'' And every document expert agreed with Johnson your memos are junk, including your own analysts.

By now just about everybody on the planet also thinks they're junk, except for that dwindling number of misguided people who watch the ''CBS Evening News'' under the misapprehension that it's a news broadcast rather than a new unreality show in which a cocooned anchor, his floundering news division and some feeble executives are trapped on their own isle of delusion and can't figure out a way to vote themselves off it.

So the only story you're in a position to break right now is: ''Late-Breaking News. Veteran Newsman Announces He's Recovered His Marbles.'' And, if last week's anything to go by, you're in no hurry to do that.

Instead, Dan keeps demanding Bush respond to the ''serious questions'' raised by his fake memos. ''With respect, Mr. President,'' he droned the other day, ''answer the questions.'' The president would love to, but he's doubled up with laughter.

I was prepared to cut the poor old buffoon some slack a week ago. But Dan's performance has grown progressively more outrageous, to the point where it's hard not to conclude he's colluding in the perpetuation of a massive if ludicrous fraud. Dan's been play-acting at being a reporter for so many years now -- the suspenders, the loosened tie, and all the other stuff that would look great if he were auditioning for a cheesy dinner-theater revival of ''The Front Page''; the over-the-top intros: ''Bob Schieffer, one of the best hard-nosed reporters in the business, has been working his sources. What have you managed to uncover for us, Bob?'', after which Bob reads out a DNC press release. Dan's been doing all this so long he doesn't seem to realize the news isn't just a show.

Round about the middle of last week, he was reduced to shoring up his collapsing fantasy with Bill Glennon, a Cliff Claven figure who was a typewriter repairman in the '70s. But, because every other CBS expert had abandoned Dan's sunk ship, Bill suddenly found himself upgraded to ''document expert.'' This guy's been insisting that you could produce Dan's bogus memos on a 1972 IBM typewriter: ''The Model D had a lever that when pushed put a rubber stopper in front of the keys so they did not strike the paper. You centered the paper using the paper scale, put the carriage on the middle mark of the front index scale, typed your heading and then made note of the number it stopped on. You then moved the carriage back to the corresponding number on the left side of the index scale and retyped your heading and . . .''

Yeah, right. Every time I want to type a memo saying Bush is unfit to be president, that's what I do, too. Look, if Dan thinks this guy's theory is correct, let's put him and his IBM Model D and me and my computer in a room at CBS News for an hour and see which one of us emerges with the closest replicas of these four documents. I'll give him ten thousand bucks for every memo he reproduces exactly, and round it up to an even 50 grand if he gets all four right.

Any takers, CBS?

So the question now is why won't Dan and Co. just admit their docs are crocks and let it go? On Wednesday, CBS News head honcho Andrew Heyward, in a slippery statement, announced that ''we established to our satisfaction that the memos were accurate.'' Note that word: not ''genuine'' but ''accurate'' -- i.e., if Lt. Col. Killian had had one of those IBM Model Ds and been willing to remove the carriage return and replace it with a rubber stopper on the front index scale while turning the crank, etc., these are the memos he would have written. Rather and Heyward are adopting the rogue-cop defense: The evidence is planted, but the guy's still guilty. Or as the New York Times' headline put it: ''Memos On Bush Are Fake But Accurate.''

Why has CBS News decided it would rather debauch its brand and treat its audience like morons than simply admit their hoax? For Dan Rather? I doubt it. Hurricane Dan looks like he's been hit by one. He's still standing, just about, but, like a battered double-wide, more and more panels are falling off every day. No one would destroy three-quarters of a century of audience trust and goodwill for one shattered anachronism of an anchorman, would they?

As the network put it last week, ''In accordance with longstanding journalistic ethics, CBS News is not prepared to reveal its confidential sources or the method by which '60 Minutes' Wednesday received the documents.'' But, once they admit the documents are fake, they can no longer claim ''journalistic ethics'' as an excuse to protect their source. There's no legal or First Amendment protection afforded to a man who peddles a fraud. You'd think CBS would be mad as hell to find whoever it was who stitched them up and made them look idiots.

So why aren't they? The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

Whatever other lessons are drawn from this, we ought at least to acknowledge that the privileged position accorded to ''official'' media and the restrictions placed on the citizenry by McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform are wholly unwarranted.

As for Heyward and Rather, the other day I came across a rare memo from April 20, 1653, typed on a 17th century prototype of the IBM Selectric. It's Oliver Cromwell's words to England's Long Parliament:

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbs; cbsnews; marksteyn; memos; rather
As usual, a home run!
1 posted on 09/18/2004 7:09:17 AM PDT by Pitiricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

Deja view all over again too...

2 posted on 09/18/2004 7:10:11 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

When I started, it wasn<t there... :-)

3 posted on 09/18/2004 7:11:13 AM PDT by Pitiricus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus
And Here....CBS defense of Rather hints at bigger story [Freeper Buckhead Scoops Rather!]
4 posted on 09/18/2004 7:14:06 AM PDT by b4its2late (John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

I understand CBS stock (Viacom) has lost almost 2 billion dollars since Monday morning last week.

That's a lot of senior citizen retirement money ....

5 posted on 09/18/2004 7:14:34 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Do you have a link?

6 posted on 09/18/2004 7:17:56 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus

CBS who ?? Wasn't that some bunch of old news elitists that were shown to be so corrupt and biased, that they went out of business because no one would listen to them or advertise on their network???

Seem to remember something like that...but that was a long time ago....

7 posted on 09/18/2004 7:18:12 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

My info is out of date: It was a stock price chart of Monday to Wednesday after noon.

Most likely more now.

Viacom started at almost 36.0 on Monday morning, was down to 34 .3 (or so) on Wednesday.

8 posted on 09/18/2004 7:20:56 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pitiricus
Cross-linking RELATED threads:
CBS defense of Rather hints at bigger story
  Posted by Pitiricus
On News/Activism 09/18/2004 7:09:17 AM PDT · 6 replies · 120+ views

Chicago Sun Times ^ | September 19 2004 | Mark Steyn

Mark Steyn:
CBS defense of Rather hints at bigger story
(FR and Buckhead mentioned)

  Posted by badfreeper
On News/Activism 09/18/2004 7:05:14 AM PDT · 10 replies · 234+ views

Chicago Sun-Times ^ | September 19, 2004 | BY MARK STEYN

CBS defense of Rather hints at bigger story
[Freeper Buckhead Scoops Rather!]

  Posted by elhombrelibre
On News/Activism 09/18/2004 2:41:25 AM PDT · 147 replies · 3,954+ views

SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST ^ | September 19, 2004 | MARK STEYN

9 posted on 09/18/2004 7:21:18 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Pitiricus

Steyn hits on what sounds like the correct note for the White House & GOP to strike: "The source of the memo's must be more damaging to CBS & the Democrats than the admission that they are fakes."

12 posted on 09/18/2004 7:30:57 AM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson