Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VIACOM CEO DUMPS $12M IN STOCK OPTIONS - w/ link to SEC
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ^

Posted on 09/19/2004 2:41:21 PM PDT by rantblogger

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: rantblogger

I heard a law professor (Stephen Bainbridge of UCLA Law) say that ANY sizeable transaction
involving Viacom/CBS during the Memogate timeframe would get a real SEC look.
This was on the Hugh Hewitt radio show this last week-
http://www.hughhewitt.com


21 posted on 09/19/2004 2:55:23 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VOA

I will be contacting the SEC tomorrow. Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein) is a born and bred Massachussetts liberal and longtime supporter of John Kerry. He needs to explain his actions to the SEC and prove that his allegiance to Kerry and Rather had no impact on his decision to sell those shares.


22 posted on 09/19/2004 2:58:41 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rantblogger

Viacom is currently spinning off Blockbuster, and is inviting stockholders to trade their Viacom shares for Blockbuster shares. To do this, they sweeten the deal by offering Viacom shareholders a premium over the market price of Blockbuster.

It is a good deal for Viacom shareholders and the fact that Redstone is only exercising the option on one third of his Viacom holdings suggests that he is not exactly rushing for the exits. he's just cashing in on a good thing , and it's perfectly legitimate.

Sorry, but this is a nonstory.


23 posted on 09/19/2004 3:01:23 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard (I, the jury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
If we know about the memo controversy, we probably would have a good idea that there would be adverse P&L controversy. If he sold on the 14th, then the market would know.

Moreover, the law for insider information is ambiguous and rarely applied. It is rarely a clear-cut case that someone is guilty of violating insider trading laws., which is why Martha Stewart wasn't charged with insider trading.

24 posted on 09/19/2004 3:04:24 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rantblogger

If Sumner and his Viacom management team are about to order a housecleaning at CBS, which could certainly affect the stock value, and they alone know about it, isn't that insider information? Stand by for Sumner's other shoe to drop, then let's see if the SEC has something to act on.


25 posted on 09/19/2004 3:05:08 PM PDT by Big Digger (If you can keep your head when others are losing theirs, you must be a Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

the paperwork for this kind of sale takes weeks to get through the lawyers for clearance, so he had most likely started this process weeks before Rathergate. no story here.


26 posted on 09/19/2004 3:06:38 PM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rantblogger

Large insider sales of stock have to be announced and approved well in advance to be legal. This was probably set in motion long before Rathergate.


27 posted on 09/19/2004 3:09:25 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
I will be contacting the SEC tomorrow.......how would I go about doing this too?
28 posted on 09/19/2004 3:10:43 PM PDT by rface (Ashland, Missouri - monthly donor /bad speller - I am a FReeper not a BLOGGER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rantblogger
This says it all.

So9

29 posted on 09/19/2004 3:12:43 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Rathergate has been in the works for several years. Redstone (Rothstein) knew about it all along.


30 posted on 09/19/2004 3:12:43 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rface

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/813828/000081382804000150/xslF345X02/red370.xml

Here is a list of some analysts that follow Viacom, as well as Viacom Investor Relation contacts. E-mail them with concerns you have about the liberal bias of Dan Rather and Mary Mapes adversely affecting CBS ratings. Also ask them why Redstone is dumping part of his investment by exercising options on 9-14.

The analysts will usually forecast Viacom’s prospects and its attractiveness as an investment. If CBS market share significantly declines, then its prospects are not good.

Be nice. These people are on the outside of Viacom and they do have some influence.

Analysts that follow Viacom
Jessica Reif Cohen - Jessica_Reif@ml.com
Katherine Styponias - katherine_styponias@prusec.com
Spencer Wang - spencer.wang@jpmorgan.com
Henry Ellenbogen - henry_ellenbogen@troweprice.com
Stacey Widlitz - swidlitz@fulcrumgp.com
John Hill - john.hill@schwab.com

Viacom Investor Relations Contacts
Carl D. Folta - carl.folta@viacom.com
Susan Duffy - susan.duffy@viacom.com
Martin Shea - marty.shea@viacom.com
James Bombassei - james.bombassei@viacom.com


31 posted on 09/19/2004 3:13:44 PM PDT by woodb01 (Take out the 'dnC'BS "news" trash... Make dnCBS EXTINCT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Insiders have to file a form 144 way in advance before they can sell shares. When they file the 144 they do not have to sell the shares by the date mentioned in the 144.

Or they can have a formula for when to sell. ie If the price gets to X sell Y number of shares. Or if the price gets to X buy Y number of shares. This way insider info does not play a part.


32 posted on 09/19/2004 3:14:00 PM PDT by stockpirate (Kerry; supported by, financed by, trained by, guided by, revered by, in favor of, Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rface

http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml


33 posted on 09/19/2004 3:14:05 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: avital2

Contrary to what you think, these transactions no longer take weeks, in fact, his "sell" notice was on 9-14 (and was almost immediate) and the public notice was done on 9-16...

Look at the governemet SEC filing yourself below...

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/813828/000081382804000150/xslF345X02/red370.xml


34 posted on 09/19/2004 3:17:53 PM PDT by woodb01 (Take out the 'dnC'BS "news" trash... Make dnCBS EXTINCT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Besides in looking at the insider trading deals for Viacom VIA and VIAB shares he has not sold any shares in at least the last 2 years.


35 posted on 09/19/2004 3:18:25 PM PDT by stockpirate (Kerry; supported by, financed by, trained by, guided by, revered by, in favor of, Communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

When it comes to exercising options, I do not think any Form 144 rules apply. Don't know what a 144 form is, but do know about exercising options, and these can be done at virtually ANY TIME without any notice.


36 posted on 09/19/2004 3:19:27 PM PDT by woodb01 (Take out the 'dnC'BS "news" trash... Make dnCBS EXTINCT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Agreed. He could be presumed to know how exactly CBS was prepared to respond to the fakes (because if he asked they would certainly have told him). But we didn't know until they did circle the wagons. Nor do we know how they are planning to stumble mumble their way forward. I sure hope the SEC are looking into this.


37 posted on 09/19/2004 3:19:45 PM PDT by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rantblogger
Maybe he had more info than what was available to the public?
Forged memos are embarrassing, but if there had been a retraction and an apology, would there have been long lasting damage?
Enough to make the CEO dump that much stock?
38 posted on 09/19/2004 3:20:42 PM PDT by occutegirl ("She is too fond of books, and it has turned her brain." ~ Louisa May Alcott)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rantblogger

I think people are reading way too much into this. Execs sell stock all the time. Especially during periods before/after earnings are announced. I would like to think that this is because of Memogate, but I don't see it.


39 posted on 09/19/2004 3:22:08 PM PDT by Cableguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woodb01

i know as a broker that the paperwork and clearance through lawyers on brokerage and company sides takes a bit of time, even if it's Sumner Redstone -- actually, especially if it's S Redstone. generally the final paperwork is signed at the actual time of the sale.


40 posted on 09/19/2004 3:26:13 PM PDT by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson