Skip to comments.
Bush Defends Decision to Oust Saddam
http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=34&tmpl=fc&in=World&cat=United_Nations ^
| 21 Sept 2004
| EagleUSA
Posted on 09/21/2004 9:30:35 AM PDT by EagleUSA
In typical shining fashion, Bush again makes the U.N. look like the irrelevant and self-serving mutual admiration society, that they are. And poor old corrupt Kofi just cannot stand it --- he just keeps taking shots at Bush, in a pathetic attempt to give some degree of credibility and authority to the U.N., while throwing more red herrings to keep the focus off of this crimes in the OIL FOR FOOD deal.
Bush keeps showing the U.N. how to regain thier relevance and functionality in the IMPORTANT ISSUES of the world, and they keep doing nothing about it. To do so, would be taking down quite a few of their "esteemed" members.
We must admire the guts of Bush. He has clearly put the U.N. into proper perspective, and basically told them to deliver or BE IRRELEVANT. I guess as long as Kofi can still keep stealing money from starving people, he does not care...of course, he has been caught. And he certainly does not like Bush, because he has upstaged the U.N. numerous times now.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: annan; bush; napalminthemorning; unitednations
1
posted on
09/21/2004 9:30:35 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: EagleUSA
Because of the U.N AMERICAN BOYS are DEAD . What more will take to get out of the U.N?
2
posted on
09/21/2004 9:31:46 AM PDT
by
watchout
To: EagleUSA
Bush is on a whole higher level than the rest of the world.
I am eagerly anticipating his debates with the drone!
To: EagleUSA
Bush should have put handcuffs on Kofi... then have him hauled off to Leavenworth.
4
posted on
09/21/2004 9:33:46 AM PDT
by
Lexington Green
(Follow the money - Saddam to Rich to Clinton)
To: EagleUSA
Didn't Clinton force the appointment of Annan? It is time for Annan to go!
5
posted on
09/21/2004 9:36:02 AM PDT
by
RAY
(They that do right are all heroes!)
To: EagleUSA; Admin Moderator
Your link leads to an article with a different title and your post is a vanity. How about looking at the posting rules?
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: EagleUSA
8
posted on
09/21/2004 9:39:50 AM PDT
by
Mercat
To: Baynative
9
posted on
09/21/2004 9:46:52 AM PDT
by
Gibtx
(Wow)
To: watchout
"What more will take to get out of the U.N?"Lord, I hope the American people have had enough already! Reality check: Probably won't be a damn thing done about the OFFS.
10
posted on
09/21/2004 10:20:25 AM PDT
by
Designer
(Sysiphus Sr. to Junior; "It was uphill, all the way, both ways!")
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Post-Mortum
Just joined, eh?
Class act...all the way.
ZOT ALERT!!!
12
posted on
09/21/2004 10:30:21 AM PDT
by
dave k
To: dave k
He's been zotted. Too bad it isn't as easy in real life.
13
posted on
09/21/2004 10:31:19 AM PDT
by
zlala
To: zlala
14
posted on
09/21/2004 10:32:29 AM PDT
by
dave k
To: EagleUSA
Please use the original title when posting articles. Thanks.
To: EagleUSA
In addition, his speech was a bitch-slap to Kerry. Nuance my ass. Kerry couldn't nuance himself out of a wet paper bag. The US (under President Bush) supports universal liberty, freedom, free trade, and democracy (all of which are inseparable). Kerry was on CBS very early this morning (2 am or so) giving a very tepid speech about how to proceed in Iraq, noting that Iraq has no tradition of free elections. Duh. Better to leave Saddam Hussein in charge than to expose Iraq to the hope of democracy, eh, Pruneface? Where's your "working with the UN" line of bull now? Six weeks from today we reelect the President. George W. Bush will be reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent
16
posted on
09/21/2004 11:24:36 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=napalminthemorning)
To: EagleUSA
Kerry keeps saying...he repeated it last night on Letterman...that it is wrong for the U.S. to be bearing 90% of the costs & supplying 90% of the troops in Iraq. He will work to get U.N. Peacekeepers over their, to replace our men, and reduce our costs.
I was screaming at Dave to ask, "But aren't U.N. troops just our guys, in blue helmets, rather than their normal green ones? And wouldn't the U.S. still be paying, via the U.N.?
Guess he couldn't hear me from the better part of 2,000 miles, and several hours in the future.
17
posted on
09/21/2004 2:49:51 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson