Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salgak

I'm not. I don't think a 10 kiloton bomb would produce wide-spread stampeding. It would gut the center of the city (where few people usually actually live), and irradiate a minor area around that. Not to sure about the lethality of a smoke plume from a small yield weapon (i.e. the weather-blown "footprint"). It would be a gigantic problem, no doubt.


7 posted on 09/22/2004 10:30:49 AM PDT by Shryke (Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Shryke

I think you are right. This is about the size of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki weapons, and note that they were *air bursts*, about 500m above the ground IIRC, for max blast effect. The effects of a ground burst would be less.


8 posted on 09/22/2004 10:41:15 AM PDT by alnitak ("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Shryke
I don't think a 10 kiloton bomb would produce wide-spread stampeding.

I beg to differ, if that were detonated in NYC there would indeed be panic to make 911 look like a parade.

It would gut the center of the city (where few people usually actually live), and irradiate a minor area around that.

Where millions of people work, this thing would go off mid-morning, mid week. Thousands, if not millions would be dead in the initial blast and thousands more would die due to radiation in the following couple weeks.

It would be a gigantic problem, no doubt.

Understatement of the year!

12 posted on 09/22/2004 10:52:29 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Shryke

True....
What is most disturbing in my mind is that triggering devices are designed safety in mind.
They enable the DROPPER to get far enough away NOT to be destroyed by the device..
You don't need much of a trigger if the DROPPER is willing to go up with the device..
One could trigger a nuclear event just by pushing two sub critical masses together...then boom


23 posted on 09/22/2004 11:03:52 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Shryke

Looking at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would guess you could expect a 50% fatality rate within the blast radius.


25 posted on 09/22/2004 11:06:29 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Shryke

I think a nuke in the one kiloton range in the center of a city would probably kill 50,000 or more, and another 50,000 sick or seriously injured. I don't think it would kill anywhere near a million people as an earlier poster suggested.

That being said, you misplace emphasis on the center of a city being 'where few people actually live.' It is certainly a place where many many people work, and that would be disasterous - take no solace that it isn't a residential area.

A 1 kiloton bomb detonated at Citicorp Center in NYC, for example, just before lunch hour, would leave a crater a little bigger than a city block and ignite at least once city block in each direction. If that isn't at least 50,000 dead and 50,000 injured, I don't know what is.


112 posted on 09/22/2004 3:25:12 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson