Posted on 09/22/2004 11:17:42 AM PDT by demlosers
In the final opinion of the court, Judge Niloufer Bhagwat, rules against Bush.
Citing: George Walker Bush, President of the United States and Commander -in-Chief of US military forces for serious crimes ; waging a war of aggression on Afghanistan, war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Afghan people, against prisoners of war ; and the use of radioactive depleted uranium weapons of mass destruction , against the people of Afghanistan ; with serious fall out effects on the military personnel of the United States ,UK and other forces deployed ; and on countries, in and around the region.
In a court action not seen since Nuremburg, 1946, the court issued its ruling in no uncertain terms that the US has used weapons of mass destruction, protracting an illegal military conflict, and crimes against humanity. Very serious allegations indeed.
The entire ruling can be found at:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Afghanistan-Criminal-Tribunal10mar04.htm.
Bush has never acknowledged this ruling, nor was the American people ever informed of it. Is the concealment an effort by Bush to keep the American people in the dark about what is really happening in the world?
In the final findings, the court said: "The Defendant [George Walker Bush] is a convicted war criminal consequently unfit to hold public office ; citizens ,soldiers and all civil personnel of the United States would be constitutionally and otherwise , justified in withdrawing all co-operation from the Defendant and his government ; and in declining to obey illegal orders of the Defendant and his administration ;including military orders threatening other nations or the people of the United States on the basis of the Nuremberg Principle, that illegal orders of Superior must not be obeyed".
The court has also faulted the US for using weapons of mass destruction; something the US invaded Iraq for in an effort to halt the creation of WDMs. The UN inspectors have said that Iraq did not have WDMs, the US can show no evidence that Iraq even had WDMs.
The court has also introduced a new word into the vocabulary of court proceedings and that is: "omnicide" - in relationship to the US"s use of depleted uranium that retains it"s radioactive threat for approximately 4.5 billion years. Not only are the present victims of American hostilities directly suffering the after effects of radioactive poisoning, but future generations will suffer equally.
Oh brother!.I googled the author and found this hate America piece.
http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/14130_opinion.html
America has many opinions about how the world should be run, and we are not afraid to say so either
"We've grown up wrong. When Bush is reelected, Americans won't have to worry about journalists that don't follow party line or the ministry of propaganda - we'll all be in prison or dead. Which should make the right wing happy for awhile, but soon the words of dissent will surface again."
Michael Berglin
...and how many divisions does the International Court have? About as many as the Pope does, I guess...
No.
Article III, section 1:
"The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish".
This "court" is not the US Supreme Court, nor is is ordained and established by Congress as an inferior Article III court.
As pertains to Americans, therefore, it does not exist.
.....btw, who pays the salaries for those nutbags?.....
President Bush should use a line from comedian Dave Chapelle as a politician at the podium:
"you don't like it? you know what you should do? sanction me!"
Kangaroo court...
I checked the website this was supposedly posted on, but the document is no longer there. After checking their homepage , I'd say their salaries are being paid by the likes of Tah-Ray-Zah and George Soros.
.....I think they indicted Clinton for using depleted uranium in Kosovo.....
.....if anyone wants to search for it.....
Go look at the document posted, 95% of the Lawyers are Nips. Trying to get even for WWII I'd bet!
More like the Monkeys running the zoo
Uh, guys, this is an obvious hoax. No court ever wrote such a thing. The posted piece itself doesn't even purport to be a court order, but some odd, bastardized description of an order with putative partial quotes (that are certainly bogus). (Anyone who wants to argue, post a link or a news story that shows this order or a news story about it. It doesn't exist, at least as described.)
None of this is to say that the overall point, that there are many international forces that would do this if they could, is false--surely it is true. But they don't have the cojones, and they would hide behind foggy bureaucratic language if they did.
But let's not be all Dan Rather and get all tizzy over garbage.
MLRS. Cluster Munitions 24/7, 365
Come and try and get him, if you think you've got the balls.
Those who support terrorists should be treated as terrorists! This judge is nothing but a terrorist!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.