Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush shows sizable lead among Colorado voters
The Pueblo Chieftain Online ^ | September 22, 2004 | PETER ROPER

Posted on 09/22/2004 5:09:52 PM PDT by COURAGE

The Pueblo Chieftain Online

Select file then print to print this article.
Published: Wednesday September 22, 2004
AP PHOTO/HADI MIZBAN
Among voters in the statewide survey, 53 percent said President Bush is better able to handle the war in Iraq while 33 percent chose Sen. John Kerry.

Bush shows sizable lead among Colorado voters

By PETER ROPER
THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN

More Colorado voters trust President Bush and his handling of the Iraq war than they do Democratic Sen. John Kerry, according to a statewide voter survey commissioned by The Pueblo Chieftain.

In a telephone survey last week of 600 registered voters who are likely to vote, 51 percent of the respondents said they would vote for Bush while 39 percent said they would vote for Kerry. The poll was conducted by Ciruli Associates of Denver. The margin for error in the poll is 4 percent.

Lurch
President Bush

"President Bush is showing surprising strength in Colorado and it's clear that Sen. Kerry has an uphill battle in the next few weeks," said pollster Floyd Ciruli.

There are more registered Republicans than Democrats in Colorado and the survey reflected that, with 42 percent of those surveyed describing themselves as either strong or mild Republicans and 33 percent describing themselves as strong or mild Democrats.

"While state voter registration is a little closer than that, historically more Republicans turn out to vote than Democrats," Ciruli said.

Bush appears to be drawing more support from Democrats and independents than Kerry is from Republicans and unaffiliated voters. According to the survey, 85 percent of the Republican voters said they were supporting Bush, along with 13 percent of the Democrats and 44 percent of the unaffiliated voters.

By comparison, Kerry had the support of 77 percent of the Democrats contacted, just 6 percent of the Republicans, and 34 percent of the unaffiliated.

"That's a surprising statistic because unaffiliated voters in Colorado tend to vote more Democratic," said Ciruli. "The fact that Bush is attracting more of them right now is significant." At the root of Bush's support is a greater degree of voter confidence in his handling of the war in Iraq and his leadership in general. According to the survey:

Fifty-five percent said Bush is a "strong leader" as compared to 27 percent who said Kerry is.

On the question of waging war against terrorism, 55 percent endorsed Bush while 29 percent chose Kerry.

Fifty-three percent approved of Bush's performance as president and the same number said he is better equipped to deal with the war in Iraq. That compared to 43 percent who disapproved of his performance and 33 percent who said Kerry is better suited to handle the war.

Similarly, 64 percent said the United States needs to keep troops in Iraq to provide security to the new government while only 26 percent said they should be withdrawn immediately.

But support for the war is not set in concrete. Asked whether the war has been worth it thus far, just 47 percent said it has, while 43 percent said it hasn't. With the survey's margin of error at 4 percent, those answers could also be regarded as a tie.

"That's a trend that is continuing downward when you realize that more than 60 percent of Coloradans supported the war just a year ago," said Ciruli. "Nationally, a slight majority of voters now believe the war is not worth the cost."

Asked about the economy and jobs, 46 percent said Bush is the better choice while 36 percent picked Kerry. On the domestic issues of health care, education and the federal deficit, voters gave Bush and Kerry almost identical marks, which underlines the importance of the war in Iraq as the central campaign issue.

"Both campaigns have tried to emphasize their domestic agendas in the past few weeks, but it seems that the president's support is clearly based on his conduct of the war on terrorism and the public's perception of him as a leader," Ciruli said.

Pollsters and other commentators have noted for months that American voters seem strongly polarized in this election with few people undecided. Ciruli said that was confirmed by last week's survey - only 7 percent of those contacted said they were undecided. "And that number is usually in double digits," he said.

"But the election still hinges on independents," said Ciruli. "Most core Republican and Democratic voters are going to stick with their candidates until Nov. 2. What could change is the support of unaffiliated voters if something dramatic happens before Election Day."

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

If you had to vote today for president would you vote for George W. Bush or John Kerry?

Bush 51%
Kerry 39
Other 2
Won’t vote 1
Don’t know/refused 7

If Ralph Nader, the Reform Party candidate, were on the ballot:

Bush 50%
Kerry 38
Nader 3
Other 1
Won't vote 1
Don't know/refused 7

PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL

Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?

Approve 53%
Disapprove 43
Don't know/refused 4

WAR IN IRAQ

Do you think it was worth going to war in Iraq?

Worth it 47%
Not worth it 43
Don't know/refused 10

Should we keep troops in Iraq to ensure the security of the new Iraq government?

Stay 64%
Withdraw 26
Don't know/refused 10

STRONGEST CANDIDATE ON ISSUES

Which candidate do you believe is better able to deal with the following issues?

  Bush Kerry Neither Both Other Don't know
Economy and jobs 46% 36% 8% 3% 3% 4%
Campaign against terror 55 29 4 4 2 6
Education 45 36 4 5 2 7
War in Iraq 53 33 6 2 2 4
Health care 40 40 9 2 3 6
Medicare and prescription drugs 39 39 9 3 3 7
Federal deficit 40 37 13 2 3 5

SUMMARY OF RATINGS

  Favorable Unfavorable Don't know
Salazar 63% 27% 10%
Owens 61 30 8
Bush 56 41 3
Coors 56 33 11
Kerry 48 48 4
Nader 21 59 20

ECONOMY

Considering the next six months, do you believe the Colorado economy will improve, stay the same or get worse?
Improve 45%
Stay the same 38
Get worse 9
Don’t know/refused 8



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; kerry; kewl; polls; redstate

Well, well, looks like CO may not be a battlegroud state after all.

1 posted on 09/22/2004 5:09:52 PM PDT by COURAGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COURAGE

It's still a battleground.

We need to crush Slime-a-zar.


2 posted on 09/22/2004 5:12:57 PM PDT by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?
Approve 53%

We have a winner!

3 posted on 09/22/2004 5:14:03 PM PDT by IrishGOP (John "Peace in Our Time" Kerry NO THANKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow

CO is a battleground state? Where have I been?


4 posted on 09/22/2004 5:14:40 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

We need to retain the senate seat.

Salazar, according to the above, is polling higher than Coors.

We must retain the senate and gain seats at all costs.


5 posted on 09/22/2004 5:17:11 PM PDT by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE

I thought they were tied!...These polls make me nuts!...

NO complacency...VOTE!


6 posted on 09/22/2004 5:17:20 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE
Colorado was never a battleground state!

And you're a little late. Lookie here.

7 posted on 09/22/2004 5:18:25 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE

I think the battleground states are now CA, WA, OR, NY, CT, NJ, DL, IL, MD.


8 posted on 09/22/2004 5:24:16 PM PDT by foobeca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
>>>>It's still a battleground.

If you knew anything about Colorado politics you'd know its not been a battleground state. Colorado is highly conservative and elected Republican GovBill Owens twice, SenWayne Allard twice and SenBen NightHorse Campbell, along with 5 0f 7 GOP House Rep`s.

And Coors will beat Salazar.

9 posted on 09/22/2004 5:24:28 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COURAGE

Colorado is where the Dems are trying to split up the electoral votes.


10 posted on 09/22/2004 5:33:45 PM PDT by cobaltblu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: foobeca
I dont's think so...


American Research Group, Inc.
State: California              
                 
Electoral votes: 55            
                 
Sample size: 600 likely voters          
Sample dates: Sep 11-13            
Margin of error: Plus or minus 4 percentage points      
                 
                 
        Bush Kerry Nader** Others Undecided
Total       41 52 0 1 6
                 
                 
Party:*   Contribution   Bush Kerry Nader** Others Undecided
Republicans 36%   83 11 0 1 5
Democrats 46%   9 85 0 0 6
Independents/Other 18%   41 49 0 4 6
                 
Sex:                
Men   48%   47 47 0 1 5
Women   52%   36 56 0 1 6
                 
* Are you registered to vote as a Republican, a Democrat, or something else?
** Ralph Nader is not on the ballot in California.

Back to ARG home


11 posted on 09/22/2004 5:37:08 PM PDT by COURAGE (A charter member of the Grim FReeper Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Only been living here 6 months.

I understand its conservative, and love it because of it.

I was just pointing out the above numbers, where Slimeyzar is ahead.

Nevertheless, its no time to slack due to assumptions.

We need more education about prop 36 too.


12 posted on 09/22/2004 5:41:38 PM PDT by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
For some informational opinion on Prop 36, check this out.
13 posted on 09/22/2004 5:48:14 PM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Are you from CO? I lived in Boulder once.


14 posted on 09/22/2004 5:51:54 PM PDT by MrChips (ARD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: foobeca

Uh, you might want to add PA to that list...


15 posted on 09/22/2004 5:53:57 PM PDT by THX 1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow; COURAGE; IrishGOP; Integrityrocks; MEG33; Reagan Man; foobeca; cobaltblu; MrChips; ...
We need more education about prop 36 too.

Thank you for bringing up one of my pet topics. I will post my standard response. I'm not trying to spam threads with this, but I want to make sure as many people as possible see it especially lurkers and new members.

It is unconstitutional, because it is a referendum. The constitution very specifically says that the state legislatures, and only the state legislatures have the authority to determine the method by which electors are chosen! The Colorado legislature very specifically rejected such a system.

As long as large states like California, New York and Texas do not change from a winner take all system, it is not in the interest of small states like Colorado to do so.

I also don't want to forgot to mention that it also violates the federal election code. The method by which the electors is selected must be in place before (as I recall at least six days prior to) the date the electors are chosen which is election day. Even if the a referendum were a valid mechanism of determining the method of allocating electors, this referendum is too late to affect the 2004 election. This referendum should be fought in court and removed from the ballot.

Article II.

Section 1
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.


16 posted on 09/22/2004 6:17:49 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson