I felt that when Rather said unimpeachable source it was
in the context of where he got the memos.
I could be wrong but that was my understanding.
> I felt that when Rather said unimpeachable source it
> was in the context of where he got the memos.
That's what most people assume. I'm not so sure.
> I could be wrong but that was my understanding.
I'm always willing to be mistaken, too.
But reportedly, there was a jubilant reaction at CBS
when the White House did their "no comment" thing.
Whether CBS based "unimpeach" on that or not, they
grossly misread it.
I have to wonder if the White House actually ran the
memos by Bush. If so, he would instantly have known
that they were forgeries (based on the content, not
the formatting), and might well have said - let's
hold our cards on this.