Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mugabe draws cheers at the UN
Mail & Guardian (South Africa) ^ | September 23, 2004 | Staff

Posted on 09/23/2004 1:51:49 AM PDT by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: MadIvan

We should have paid this crank us visit with helos long ago,and Blair should have also.

We just let injustice fester when a simple compromise could solve the problem. Whites give back some land and keep some, in return, they teach black native successful farming methods.

Mugabe is a rascist tumor on Africa. IMO


41 posted on 09/23/2004 2:42:35 AM PDT by Finalapproach29er ({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BritishBulldog
The US pays 22% of the US budget not the UN budget. Britain pays 5.3% of the British budget. How do you figure that you pay more per head than the US does?
42 posted on 09/23/2004 2:47:08 AM PDT by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
whoa check this out if that doesn't get your blood moving!

The United Nations and all its agencies and funds spend about $10 billion each year, or about $1.70 for each of the world's inhabitants. This is a very small sum compared to most government budgets and it is just a tiny fraction of the world's military spending. Yet for over a decade, the UN has faced a debilitating financial crisis and it has been forced to cut back on important programs in all areas. Many member states have not paid their full dues and have cut their donations to the UN's voluntary funds. As of June 30, 2004, members arrears to the Regular Budget topped $1.052 billion, of which the United States alone owed $557 million (53% of the regular budget).
source

they are making it look like we are shirking our obligations? WTF!!! LOL

43 posted on 09/23/2004 2:49:43 AM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

Several years ago I ran across a site that listed what each country was assessed. I remember one country that was assessed less than $5,000 a year. I haven't been able to locate that site again. It was amazing to see how little some countries pay.

I pay more in income taxes than some of these countries pay to have a voice in the UN. Unreal.

The way I understand this is that each country pays a certain percentage of their GDP.


44 posted on 09/23/2004 3:22:35 AM PDT by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: texastoo

The day after the election FR's need to target the UN thru congress. And not let up one bit!


45 posted on 09/23/2004 3:26:10 AM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: texastoo

China 2.something billion people they pay as best I can tell .001% DOH!


46 posted on 09/23/2004 3:31:28 AM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

This is laughable.
Mugabwe gets applause from the UN, while he lets his own people starve to death.
The fact that the UN entertain him at all is disgusting.


47 posted on 09/23/2004 3:35:41 AM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

The UN is a done deal. It is here to stay. As a matter of fact, after the election one of the main things facing us will be the FTAA. Nafta and all of these treaties comes via the UN. Each year we get in thicker and thicker with the UN.

The UN will even be monitoring our elections under assumed names.


48 posted on 09/23/2004 3:37:23 AM PDT by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
The U.N. really does need to go the way of the League of Nations.

The sooner, the better.

49 posted on 09/23/2004 3:43:48 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC
why do we still give the UN over $300 million dollars a year? FAR MORE than ANY other country?

We don't give "far more" than Japan; for 2004, we are scheduled to give $363 million, and Japan is scheduled to give $280 million.

Seeing as our population is well more than double Japan's, we actually give less per capita than Japan does:

As to why we give any money to the U.N., it certainly isn't because it is a good idea or because we get good value for our money.

The U.N. is proving to be a malignant version of the old League of Nations, which was just as impotent, but not so uncivilized as to cheer baldly murderous dictators like Robert Mugabe.

Perhaps President Carter or President Clinton feels comfortable in the U.N.'s halls, but President Bush did exactly the right action, and not a criminal one as Secretary General Annan recently suggested, when we took unsanctioned multilateral action against the evil dictator Hussein. Had we waited on that knitting society to take action, Hussein would still be in a palace, not in a jail cell.

50 posted on 09/23/2004 3:44:48 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
Several years ago I ran across a site that listed what each country was assessed. I remember one country that was assessed less than $5,000 a year. I haven't been able to locate that site again. It was amazing to see how little some countries pay.

The U.N. has a pretty good list here, even detailing what day they received their money. As to contributors at the sub-$5000 level, it appears that the only political unit at that level was the Vatican, at $2,586. The next tier appears to be a slew of tiny countries at $14,360.

51 posted on 09/23/2004 3:56:49 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

I agree.
The fact that Mugabe got ANY applause for that line about Bush and Blair indicates the underlying mindset of the United Nations...
The least we should do in response as a nation is move the #%$^& thing off our shores.


52 posted on 09/23/2004 3:56:51 AM PDT by libwacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

I agree.
The fact that Mugabe got ANY applause for that line about Bush and Blair indicates the underlying mindset of the United Nations...
The least we should do in response as a nation is move the #%$^& thing off our shores.


53 posted on 09/23/2004 3:58:32 AM PDT by libwacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
well, maybe you can tell me why Japan isn't on the security counsel since they give so much...
54 posted on 09/23/2004 4:00:17 AM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

It is way past time to get the hell out of that den of thieves. Our financial support is read as "The U.S. is the world's biggest patsy", and that has to change. Let them move to Paris -- without us.


55 posted on 09/23/2004 4:04:27 AM PDT by thelastvirgil (Idiot-proof ANYTHING, and someone will build a better idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC
well, maybe you can tell me why Japan isn't on the security counsel since they give so much...

Good question. Prime Minister Koizumi is indeed right now pushing for a seat on the security counsel, having taken it on as a project. He has been doing a lot of logrolling out in the wider world, being in many ways the best prime minister in the post-war era in my estimation.

56 posted on 09/23/2004 4:07:48 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Mugabe draws cheers at the UN

The only thing Mugabe should get anywhere is leg irons.

57 posted on 09/23/2004 4:09:10 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Any organization that cheers Mugabe for anything is, prima facie, bankrupt, corrupt, debauched, degenerate, depraved, felonious, illegitimate, illicit, immoral, invalid, null, reprobate, unethical, unprincipled, unscrupulous, vicious, vile, villainous, . . . .
58 posted on 09/23/2004 4:26:21 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Anyone who would cheer that worthless p***k would play tapes of the beheadings over and over again while m**ter*****g. The Unmitigated Numbskulls must go! We have kept this viper at our bosom far too long.


59 posted on 09/23/2004 4:32:49 AM PDT by Dionysius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Time to revoke the charter and take the land back by eminent domain. For the good of the world it needs to be done.


60 posted on 09/23/2004 4:41:19 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson