Skip to comments.Kerry Turns On Americans at War Again!
Posted on 09/23/2004 4:55:52 PM PDT by Bushbacker1
Cal Thomas has hit a home run with this scathing editorial about the Anti-American John Kerry. The last paragraph, listed below, says it all! This article should be required reading for every American! If you click on the URL, you will have to click on archives to read the article.
"John Kerry Does It Again!"
"The objective should be victory. It was a word absent from Kerry's speech, because it is a concept foreign to a man who has demonstrated his preference - first with Vietnam and now with Iraq - to help America's enemies in times of crisis far more than helping his own country."
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
CAN'T wait to see the RNC ads attacking sKerry on this very point!!...NOT!
Rush hammered the victory line today.
The Traitor who would be President.
It is a concept foreign to a man that cares about nothing but his own advancement!
What a great read! Kerry the Traitor.....then & now. The man needs confinement in a mental hospital. He's nuts!
Kerry claimed President Bush has offered "23 different rationales for this war." Even if that were true, he is still far behind the number of flip-flops committed by Kerry on the war and a long list of other issues.
Cal (and Kerry of course) miss the point here. There probably WERE 23 different reasons for removing Saddam Hussein. If anything that makes the case against Saddam even stronger, not weaker.
It's amazing that conservatives have so little instinct for spinning that Thomas missed the obvious comeback to this.
Comeback: There wasn't just the threat of WMDs that the whole world thought Saddam had, there were 22 OTHER reasons besides to get rid of him as well.
I'm amazed that the dems managed to sell that "23 different" reasons as somehow being problematic.
And people wonder why he was court martialed and dishonorably discharged from the Navy (sure, Carter pardoned him almost 10 years later); it is what happens to unpatriotic traitors!! Ask Benedict Arnold!!!
Special Ops should be looking into the very real possibility Kerry has been in Iran selling us out. So far he is following the same course he set in the 1970's, so if he hasn't already been in Syria, or maybe Pakistan, or Iran, you can bet your booties he will be.
I swear my wife must write Cal's columns! She said (again) that this slimeball of a candidate is doing to our troops in Iraq what he did to our troops in Vietnam. Damn him! (I said that, not she!)
We lost Vietnam because of the Kerry type Democrats UNDERMINING America's military, and we lost face and many thousands of our allies died.....and now we are de javue land. He is DISGUSTING!
He hasn't got the weather underground blowing up campuses, Kent State isn't happening over again, and he's already thrown his medals away once. Election night could get really lonely for him if he keeps this up.
I think Kerry just gave himself the coup de grace when he arrogantly criticized the Iraqi Prime Ministers speech and presumed to know more than the people intimately involved in the day to day operations in Iraq. What a maroon.
Kerry will blather on about 'presidentiaaaal liiiiiies', then Bush will say in so many words, John Kerry and his ilk were the problem then, and they are still the same problem, and I am the solution. Dots connected, historical circle completed, Vietnam vets vindicated, case closed.
Kerry has been very consistent in his loyalties. He's always loyal to whatever enemy the USA currently has.
In the 1970s he was loyal to North Vietnam.
In the 1980s he was loyal to the Soviet Union and to Nicaraqua.
In the 1990s he was loyal to anybody the CIA might be interested in investigating.
Most recently he's expressed loyalty to Sadam.
Yes, I know. He has been instumental in many failed US policies. His intent is to undermine whatever this country is trying to do. Have you noticed how many of his statements today are remarkably similar to those spoken in 1971? Eerily similar!
You said, "And people wonder why he was court martialed and dishonorably discharged from the Navy (sure, Carter pardoned him almost 10 years later); it is what happens to unpatriotic traitors!! Ask Benedict Arnold!!!"
Realizing I am new here, but really now, is your statement true?
Further, why do you think Traitor John refuses to release his military records? You think he's got more Purple Hearts he doesn't want us to know about?
Why do you think Harvard Law refused him admission in 1973? Even Harvard didn't want any cashiered traitors!
If you don't believe me, ask McAuliffe, Terry Kerry, David Thorne (Gigilo John's previous wife's brother) or even the Traitor, himself. It's all in his official Navy file!