Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Outlines Strategy Against Terrorism
AP ^ | 9-24-2004 | MARY DALRYMPLE, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 09/24/2004 1:12:08 AM PDT by BigWaveBetty

PHILADELPHIA - John Kerry (news - web sites), intensifying his assault on President Bush (news - web sites)'s record fighting terrorism, is outlining a detailed strategy to contain terrorists and bolster national security.

In a speech for delivery at Temple University, Kerry sought to describe a path that would improve America's prestige in the world and reduce the country's vulnerability to terrorists.

"Our goal is that at the end of that, people will say, 'This guy will seek and defeat the terrorist,'" said spokesman Mike McCurry.

Kerry planned to outline his strategy against terrorism on Friday, a day after telling The Columbus Dispatch that the president's actions in Iraq (news - web sites) and elsewhere show Bush masquerading as a mainstream conservative while pursuing extremist policies.

"I don't view these people as conservatives," Kerry said. "I actually view them as extreme, and I think their policies have been extreme, and that extends all the way to Iraq, where this president, in my judgment, diverted the real war on terror — which was Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) and al-Qaida — and almost obsessively moved to deal with Iraq in a way that weakened our nation, overextended our armed forces, cost us $200 billion and created a breach in our oldest alliances."

Kerry also mentioned a blurring line between the separation of church and state and the growth of federal budget deficits.

To douse the spread of terrorism, Kerry proposes policies aimed at denying individuals and groups the ability to organize and attack. Kerry would build a better military and intelligence apparatus to go after enemies, deny terrorists weapons and financing, move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers, and promote freedom and democracy in Muslim nations.

Kerry has repeatedly argued that the war in Iraq has distracted attention and resources from the pursuit of terrorists, including Osama bin Laden.

The Bush-Cheney campaign said that Kerry has held conflicting positions on that point. They point to instances where Kerry said the former Iraqi leader acted like a terrorist and said that the war on terrorism should be seen as an operation bigger than the conflict in Afghanistan (news - web sites).

Kerry visits the Pennsylvania battleground before a quick trip home to Boston and then several days spent preparing for the presidential debates. Kerry told The Columbus Dispatch that he has to present himself "clearly, forcefully to the American people with a clear set of priorities."

Kerry added: "I think a lot of people will tune in. There are undecideds. A lot of folks will try to measure our character and our vision, so I think it's an important moment."


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: kerry; kerryforeignpolicy; kerrystrategy; kerrywot
Kerry told The Columbus Dispatch that he has to present himself "clearly, forcefully to the American people with a clear set of priorities."

Try more lip tint, that'll convince me.

1 posted on 09/24/2004 1:12:09 AM PDT by BigWaveBetty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
"To douse the spread of terrorism, Kerry proposes policies aimed at denying individuals and groups the ability to organize and attack. Kerry would build a better military and intelligence apparatus to go after enemies, deny terrorists weapons and financing, move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers, and promote freedom and democracy in Muslim nations."

In other words, his plan is Bush's plan, but he'll take twice as long to say it.

2 posted on 09/24/2004 1:15:15 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

He'll also put a chicken in every pot, find a cure for cancer, and end poverty. You know, what he wants to accomplish is all good and well, but how about the HOW he plans to accomplish it. Liberals, they always state the obvious but never follow it up with anything of value.


3 posted on 09/24/2004 1:18:53 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

And Kerry's record of supporting military spending is??

Again, Zell Miller's ring true... FIGHT THEM WITH WHAT SPITBALLS?


4 posted on 09/24/2004 1:20:06 AM PDT by JesseJane ( “fake but accurate” ... it’s like saying a body in a pine box is “dead but lifelike.” -- Lileks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

So... what is different in his plan from what Gee Dubya is doing??? And more importantly; if he is gonna do what Bush is doing already, why should I dump Bush and vote for him?

What a maroon.


5 posted on 09/24/2004 1:20:42 AM PDT by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane

um...some details plz mr kerry. The i will do it better thing aint washing. Put some meat on the plate, some substance. The vague generalities are not believable.


6 posted on 09/24/2004 1:22:52 AM PDT by Casaubon (jus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

Exactly...

Kerry has adopted Bush's plan.

Last week, he said that was a mistake.

Dang... I know this independent is inspired - really !!! >kawf<


7 posted on 09/24/2004 1:30:54 AM PDT by xtinct (I was the kid next door's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

"Kerry would build a better military and intelligence apparatus to go after enemies, deny terrorists weapons and financing, move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers, and promote freedom and democracy in Muslim nations."

Kerry's record indicates he has NEVER supported a "better military and intelligence apparatus."

His record is the OPPOSITE.


8 posted on 09/24/2004 1:32:14 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1225451/posts


9 posted on 09/24/2004 1:32:18 AM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
Kerry told The Columbus Dispatch that he has to present himself "clearly, forcefully to the American people with a clear set of priorities."

Kerry is good at telling us what he plans to tell us without ever really telling us. Then, he calls that a plan. DOOFUS!

10 posted on 09/24/2004 1:33:58 AM PDT by buzzsaw6 (26 year military vet still serving in the ANG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

Re: "oldest alliances"

What's good of an alliance when they profit at our misfortune?


11 posted on 09/24/2004 1:35:31 AM PDT by endthematrix (Where is that number for FReeper addiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
To douse the spread of terrorism, Kerry proposes policies aimed at denying individuals and groups the ability to organize and attack. Kerry would build a better military and intelligence apparatus to go after enemies, deny terrorists weapons and financing, move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers, and promote freedom and democracy in Muslim nations.

Yadda yadda yadda. He sounds like Miss Massachusetts answering in the "Question Segment." Please don't do the swimsuit competition again, either.

12 posted on 09/24/2004 1:38:29 AM PDT by Watery Tart (‘verbose, shapeless, platitudinous, complacent, ill-disciplined, arrogant and humourless’. –- Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon
"TRUST ME!"

Famous last words.

13 posted on 09/24/2004 1:38:54 AM PDT by endthematrix (Where is that number for FReeper addiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane

"And Kerry's record of supporting military spending is??"

This too is what I don't even get. How can the man actually stand there and say these words?? Theres no way he's credible on this subject. But you know and I know and everyone knows he's playing to the least informed voting populace that there is. They honestly don't know his record. He and the DNC have done a fine job saying that Zell Miller was over the top and mean-spirited and spreading lies, but they arent lies! They're the truth.

My biggest question to Kerry would be to tell us a weapon system he DID support (and can prove on record).

Another thing is why in the world would people trust the man on the economy? What has he done to deserve THAT credibility? Absolutely nothing...not...one...damn...thing


14 posted on 09/24/2004 1:44:57 AM PDT by libs_kma (FU*K HANOI JOHN AND THE HORSE HE'S MARRIED TOO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Watery Tart

Maybe Kerry is just gonna stand up and tell those nasty insurgents to 'skeedaddle'...g'wone now.. git! And POOF, the old Kerry magic Jihad-B-Gone plan will receive a French-tickler tape parade..


15 posted on 09/24/2004 1:46:27 AM PDT by JesseJane ( “fake but accurate” ... it’s like saying a body in a pine box is “dead but lifelike.” -- Lileks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma
But you know and I know and everyone knows he's playing to the least informed voting populace that there is.

True, and the ABB crowd.. They don't care what the truth is anyway. I think the debates will make a huge difference. I'm hoping so anyway.

16 posted on 09/24/2004 1:54:15 AM PDT by JesseJane ( “fake but accurate” ... it’s like saying a body in a pine box is “dead but lifelike.” -- Lileks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

Yep, and shave those teeth a bit further.


17 posted on 09/24/2004 1:54:30 AM PDT by hope (great men talk about ideas~average men talk about things~small men talk about others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

18 posted on 09/24/2004 2:01:55 AM PDT by The Turbanator (Vote Democrat They have what it takes, to take what you have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
"Kerry sought to describe a path that would improve America's prestige in the world."

19 posted on 09/24/2004 2:10:07 AM PDT by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
Kerry would build a better military and intelligence apparatus to go after enemies, deny terrorists weapons and financing, move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers, and promote freedom and democracy in Muslim nations.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

Kerry has been drinking his own bath water!!
20 posted on 09/24/2004 2:28:36 AM PDT by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

What no Bag Balm? Seriously this from a man who turns tail and runs when the rest of the men in the Swift Boats stayed to rescue the men of boat #3? The man who cut and run after 3 baby boo, boos?


21 posted on 09/24/2004 2:37:54 AM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

He's a day late and a dollar short. Dubya's already doing all this. Gee, senator if you maybe spent some time actually DOING your job as senator you would know all this.


22 posted on 09/24/2004 2:43:43 AM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

What an ignorant Baffoon. does he really believe this BS they write for him. he is a pathetic spineless elitist.


23 posted on 09/24/2004 2:51:24 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
I think that what we are trying to say is we do have a method. We believe we do have a plan.  ---John Kerry, 1971

24 posted on 09/24/2004 3:09:50 AM PDT by Use It Or Lose It (Follow the DOC-U-DRAMA trail all the way back to Terry McAuliffe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Use It Or Lose It

"..move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers"
Then why is he against the war in Iraq ?..Did he mention he will impliment this all only if Franch says 'it's ok ?


25 posted on 09/24/2004 3:15:54 AM PDT by omstrat (zip code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: The Turbanator

HAHAHAHHAHAHA ..Just spit out my morning coffee....


26 posted on 09/24/2004 3:16:53 AM PDT by omstrat (zip code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

The one thing that J-Effin-K is good at is telling other people what they should be doing.


27 posted on 09/24/2004 3:32:51 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ (I'm in old skivvies and New Jersey, and I approved this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

Bottom line: Kerry has no record to show he can lead the nation on any issue, especially fighting terrorism.


28 posted on 09/24/2004 4:17:07 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye ((Kerry is a flake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
Summary: Kerry's call that Allawi is a liar is comparable to Kerry throwing his medals over the fence.

Kerry isn't a team player. He shirks from "duty" (look at his Senate & Vietnam record).

He's his own puppet master with one odd string attached...and that string belongs to Tereeza...the lady who wants a Senator for a husband...no matter the cost.

29 posted on 09/24/2004 4:47:32 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty

Did he say he already gave his detailed plan in New York?
So what's this plan?


30 posted on 09/24/2004 4:51:41 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
To douse the spread of terrorism, Kerry proposes policies aimed at denying individuals and groups the ability to organize and attack. Kerry would build a better military and intelligence apparatus to go after enemies, deny terrorists weapons and financing, move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers, and promote freedom and democracy in Muslim nations.

Dang. Why didn't WE think of all that? And it's sheer brilliant nuance to dump all over the only Muslim leader that is promoting freedom and democracy in the Mideast. It'll make our enemies all confused about his double-secret plan to promote freedom and democracy in muslim nations.

31 posted on 09/24/2004 4:59:02 AM PDT by guitfiddlist (The Left is smart enough to know the truth, but low enough not to care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitfiddlist

"To douse the spread of terrorism, Kerry proposes policies aimed at denying individuals and groups the ability to organize and attack. Kerry would build a better military and intelligence apparatus to go after enemies, deny terrorists weapons and financing, move against worldwide terrorist havens and recruitment centers, and promote freedom and democracy in Muslim nations. "

Been there, doing that, want a t-shirt Mr. Kerry?



32 posted on 09/24/2004 5:03:54 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Control the information given to society and you control society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

flip-flop-flip-flop-flip-flop-flip-flop.........


33 posted on 09/24/2004 5:34:58 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Free Republic = PNN = Pajama News Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Prosposing policies that will x requires stating the actual policy that supposedly will x. Kerry has not done so. Building a better y requires stating what is wrong with the current form of y and how it can be impreoved. Kerry has not done so. Far from "detailed proposals", the article is almost entirely atmospheric partisan carping without policy specifics. There is less than one paragraph on actual policy, and that does not state a single expedient that can actually be implimented. It is a list of things he thinks would be nice to accomplish, not any way of accomplishing a single one of them. That isn't a policy. It is hand waving.

We know Bush's policy to deal with terrorists. It can be stated in plain English. It has serious consequences and reasonable people can disagree about whether it is the right approach, but everyone knows what it is, and that it is directed at its goal.

Bush's policy is

(1) do not distinguish between terrorists and states that harbor them
(2) demand cessation of WMD projects in states that support terrorism
(3) use conventional military force, pre-emptively, to destroy terrorist states pursuing WMDs
(4) remove governments that support terrorism by all means available
(5) support any government that cracks down on terrorists within its borders, politically and with military cooperation and economic aid
(6) centralize domestic security and counterintelligence, federalize security functions
(7) form coalitions of the willing on each anti-terror policy, allowing no one to veto any US action
(8) modernize the DoD and recast deployments world wide to focus on deployability, flexibility, and the WoT
(9) increase the defense budget to 5% of GDP, fully funding next generation technologies
(10) promote the spread of democratic regimes in place of terror states, by direct military support and substantial economic aid

Every aspect of this program has been criticized by Kerry and his fellow Democrats. He wants to say "me too" to the goals but "no way" to the means. So he must name his means. He has not remotely done so.

He has suggested he will remove US troops from Iraq within his first term or perhaps within six months, denigrated allies supporting us there, denigrated the present government of Iraq, voted against funding pretty much any of it, implied he would give the UN a veto over US military actions, and to this day, less than 2 months before he wants to be named president, has failed to state with specificity even approaching that above, a single alterate policy he would pursue.

He has in fact claimed that he cannot name such policies before he is president. You can look it up, he has said so. He is a sitting US senator, and his official duties require him to advise on such matters and have for years. In that capacity he has taken multiple sides on successive major US security matters depending entirely on the party controling the White House, while also voting against essentially every improvement in US defense capabilities he has ever been presented.

He is asking us to support a blank "anything but the present policy" check, issued to a demonstratively unprincipled dove. Which is not a serious policy proposal. It isn't a policy proposal. It isn't serious either, it is transparently ducking the question, employed by a self important prima donna who can't be bothered to advise his own country to hide from his atrocious record on national security issues.

34 posted on 09/24/2004 7:09:55 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigWaveBetty
Kerry Outlines Strategy Against Terrorism

Actually, he doesn't, but that's AP's story, and they are sticking by it.

35 posted on 09/24/2004 7:19:22 AM PDT by Area Freeper (From John Kerry, they get a "yes/no/maybe" bowl of mush that can only encourage our enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ed_in_NJ
No he is not. He is fine at saying they are doing it all wrong, and should do "something" that makes manna rain. But he can't say what will do that. Kerry states desired goals, entirely unrealistic ones like being saved by the French (who have directly said they won't help, even if Kerry is elected). He does not state concrete actions within the power of the US president that he would take if elected.

If Bush wanted to impliment Kerry's policies on Iraq or the WoT generally, he could not do so. He couldn't find them, and Kerry would instantly shift his policies so they did not coincide with Bush's actions. Everyone knows this. It has even played out that way several times, on minor matters (commission recommendations, setting handover or election dates, visits to the UN, etc).

No clearer demonstration is possible that he does not care what is done, only that he isn't the one doing it. He is not running for president to get something different done. He is saying he would do something different in order to run from president. That is why he can't specify what that difference would actually be.

36 posted on 09/24/2004 7:21:02 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Oh, I see now. He's going to deny weapons to the terriorist. That is a great idea. Why hasn't anyone in the Bush adminstration thought of that???


37 posted on 09/24/2004 7:22:47 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson