Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush Says No Draft
George W. Bush ^ | September 28, 2004

Posted on 09/28/2004 8:34:41 AM PDT by RWR8189

No, we're not going -- we don't need the draft. Look, the all-volunteer Army is working. The all-volunteer Army... I know Senator McCain and I agree on this issue for certain, the all-volunteer Army works."   

~ President George W. Bush, August 10, 2004
 
President Bush is committed to keeping participation in the United States Armed Services voluntary.  The President’s cabinet has stated that a draft is not being considered.  Recruitment and retention rates remain strong, and the military has not had any problem maintaining a strong force.  President Bush is confident in the current state of the military and has assured that Nation that the all-volunteer military force is working well.

President Bush's Administration has Remained Consistent on the Draft


John Kerry is using the draft to scare young voters and veterans.  
During campaign stops, John Kerry has worked to scare voters by suggesting that President Bush will initiate a draft.  "If George Bush were to be re-elected, given the way he has gone about this war and given his avoidance of responsibility in North Korea and Iran and other places, is [a draft] possible? I can't tell you."  (John Kerry, September 22, 2004)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armedforces; bc04; bush43; draft; gwb2004; thedraft; volunteerarmy; waronterror

1 posted on 09/28/2004 8:34:46 AM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

If memory serves me right, the only ones pushing for legislation to bring back the draft are democrats. Especially Charles Rangle (D-NY)


2 posted on 09/28/2004 8:35:56 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

Your memory is right on target. Both the house and the senate bills were put forward by Dems in Jan of 2003


3 posted on 09/28/2004 8:37:52 AM PDT by sierrahome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I can't wait for the debate. Bush will be able to point out that he's already doing the good parts of Kerry's "plans," and he can likewise point out where Kerry is lying about what Bush has and has not done.


4 posted on 09/28/2004 8:38:23 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The Brownshirts For Kerry NEVER mention the Democrat sponsorship of these bills (all 16, now 15, signers were Democrats).

I have asked why there aren't ANY Republican signers if the administration so much wants this.

The dumb kids in college actually think that this is a Bush led effort. As if Shiela Jackson Lee has ever been on his side.

I've seen a recent effort to step up this crap scare tactic (fliers/graffiti in bars, posting on apolitical forums, et al).

The history books will never note all of the LIES that are being told by the party faithful as a whisper smear campaign.

F. DemocRats.


5 posted on 09/28/2004 8:45:45 AM PDT by weegee (What's the provenance, Kenneth? Where did the forged SeeBS memo come from?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

While most people seem to think that George W. Bush is plotting to draft your children after he wins the election this November, it would be wise to consider that there are two bills in Congress seeking to reinstate the draft - both being pushed by leftwing Democrats!

H.R. 163 (14 cosponsors) and S. 89 (no cosponsors) were both introduced by Democrats Charles Rangel (NY) and Ernest Hollings (SC) respectively. The bills were introduced in January 2003 and would require both men and women to either perform mandatory military or civilian service. Both of these pieces of legislation are currently stalled and there's no indication that they are going anywhere anytime soon.


6 posted on 09/28/2004 8:50:53 AM PDT by NWO Slave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; All
See also:

HR 163 & SB 89 Exposed: The Honest Truth About the Draft (why the Dems pushed the draft in 2003)

DRAFT LIKELY TO RETURN UNDER BUSH (LIAR ALERT! KERRY TRYING TO SCARE YOUNG VOTERS!)

7 posted on 09/28/2004 9:11:22 AM PDT by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Rosen: Draft bills a cynical ruse
8 posted on 09/28/2004 9:12:59 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
The dumb kids in college actually think that this is a Bush led effort.

Proof that education doesn't always equal wisdom, especially when said learning is chiefly four years of leftist cheerleading.

9 posted on 09/28/2004 9:49:20 AM PDT by Denver Ditdat (Ronald Reagan belongs to the ages now, but we preferred it when he belonged to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

That's a shame, I hope he changes his mind after the election. BTW, an attrition rate of over 50% of white females during their first enlistment period does not qualify as "extraordinarily well" by my estimation.


10 posted on 09/28/2004 11:55:27 AM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson