Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders Nader off Wisconsin ballot, appeal filed
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel ^ | 9/28/2004 | JR ROSS

Posted on 09/28/2004 3:08:46 PM PDT by lionstar

Judge orders Nader off Wisconsin ballot, appeal filed

By JR ROSS Associated Press Writer

MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- A Dane County judge Tuesday kicked Ralph Nader off the Wisconsin ballot, prompting an immediate appeal by the independent presidential candidate with the state Supreme Court.

While Judge Michael Nowakowski ruled Nader should be left off the ballot, he also prohibited the Elections Board from sending county clerks a certified list of presidential candidates until Wednesday afternoon to give Nader's backers a chance to appeal.

There was no immediate word from the Supreme Court whether it would accept the case.

The decision could have huge implications for the presidential race in Wisconsin and the election in general. Some Democrats still blame Nader's 2000 candidacy for President Bush's victory and fear he could siphon votes away from their nominee, John Kerry, this year.

It also could disrupt the process of printing and mailing ballots, especially those that go to absentee voters. County clerks face a deadline this weekend to print ballots and mail them to those planning to vote absentee.

State Democrats sued to kick Nader off the ballot, claiming he had failed to comply with state law that requires presidential candidates to list 10 electors on their nomination papers. The statute says the electors shall include one from each congressional district and two at-large.

One of Nader's electors listed as living in one congressional district actually lives in another. Electors cast ballots in the electoral college to decide the presidential race.

The state Elections Board last week refused a request from the Democratic Party of Wisconsin to kick Nader off the ballot on those grounds.

Nowakowski ruled Tuesday Nader's nomination papers were defective because of the mistake. But he said the Elections Board had the authority to ignore the mistake and leave him on the ballot.

Still, he said the board had relied on an incorrect interpretation in a state statute in its ruling last week and thus found Nader should be off the ballot.

Nader's appeal asks the Supreme Court to bypass the appeals court and take it up directly. It also asks the court to prohibit the Elections Board from certifying any presidential candidates for the Wisconsin ballot and restore Nader to the ballot.

---


TOPICS: Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: ballotaccess; nader
Which party is always accused of suppressing the vote?
1 posted on 09/28/2004 3:08:46 PM PDT by lionstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lionstar
This is total BS. Look, there isn't a chance in hell I would ever vote for Ralph Nader, but if the guy meets the basic requirements, he needs to be on the ballot. I can't stand these demoCREEP judges (of demoCREEP-appointed judgers) playing with the elections like this. Jimmy Carter might be right that the elections are going to be a problem, but it has nothing to do with the voting machines used, it will have to do with the judicial interference that the demoSCUMs are pulling.

Pathetic.

2 posted on 09/28/2004 3:12:49 PM PDT by mattdono (Chris Matthew is Zell Miller's b*tch! (and the MSM is FR's b*tch!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lionstar

Nowakowski is using some pretty weird legal gymnastics to rule the elections board had the authority to ignore a technical defect, but that he has the authority to overturn their ruling, thus negating the very authority which he rules they had. Wow!


3 posted on 09/28/2004 3:13:40 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lionstar

And the judge is a Democrat, right?


4 posted on 09/28/2004 3:13:48 PM PDT by RockinRight (W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lionstar
Nader is having a Tom Daschle day all over the country, from the SCOTUS on down.
5 posted on 09/28/2004 3:16:56 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lionstar
Okay, let me see if I'm following this: in New Jersey in 2002, the Democrats forced the state to put someone ON the ballot so that the people can have a choice, but in Wisconsin the Democrats are forcing the state to take someone OFF the ballot so the people can't have a choice?

-PJ

6 posted on 09/28/2004 3:17:17 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lionstar

Let Every Vote Count!!


7 posted on 09/28/2004 3:22:51 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (W WALKS THE WALK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
"And the judge is a Democrat, right?

Right

8 posted on 09/28/2004 3:27:51 PM PDT by gorush (Exterminate the Moops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lionstar

I think this is one of the biggest stories of the year. I can`t believe the MSM is ignoring this ( well maybe I can ) . Where in the world is Jimmy Carter. Oh yeah, he is crying about the disenfranchisement of other voters, people who want to vote for Kerry.


9 posted on 09/28/2004 3:29:43 PM PDT by Peace will be here soon (Congrats Port Adelaide Power ! 2004 AFL champs !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lionstar

That's not the only problem with Wisconsin's electoral process. Their's is as bad as Florida's.


10 posted on 09/28/2004 4:16:51 PM PDT by MadAnthony1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson