Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last time we had Bilateral talks with North Korea, as Kerry wants, they deceived US
PBS Frontline ^ | 2002 | PBS

Posted on 10/01/2004 7:40:46 PM PDT by Job03

In Geneva in October 1994...U.S. and North Korean representatives finally announced a breakthrough in their talks. The two countries had begun bilateral negotiations over nuclear proliferation concerns...and finally a settlement was at hand.

The U.S. initiated the talks after North Korea threatened to withdraw from the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty....The United States was already convinced the North Koreans had produced at least one nuclear weapon....Between sessions, North Korea violated an international treaty when military personnel removed fuel rods from a nuclear reactor without the presence of a UN monitor. The United States threatened to lobby the UN for sanctions against North Korea, whose population already suffered from widespread famine. Each time talks broke down, top White House officials and military experts spoke publicly about the prospect of war on the Korean peninsula.

After one breakdown in the talks, former President Jimmy Carter traveled to Pyongyang to meet North Korean officials. Tensions between the two countries cooled. But the sudden death of North Korea's leader Kim Il-sung halted progress in the negotiations once again.

When the third round of talks started up again in the fall of 1994, negotiators on both sides wrangled over every word of a potential accord....In the pact, North Korea agreed to freeze its nuclear weapons development program. In exchange, the United States and its allies promised to provide North Korea with heavy fuel oil and two proliferation-resistant, light-water reactor power plants. The deal also called for gradual improvement of relations between the United States and North Korea and between North and South Korea.

...But within a few short months, the rivals' old suspicions of one another crept back. Implementation of the new agreement was stalled.

(Excerpt) Read more at pbs.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kerry; kerryforeignpolicy; korea; northkorea; nuclear; proliferation; wmd
How can Kerry in the debate state that bilateral talks with North Korea could be successful, when in 1994 such negotiations failed to stop that country's nuclear ambitions? Even PBS shows how Clinton and Carter's appeasement was a failure.
1 posted on 10/01/2004 7:40:46 PM PDT by Job03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Job03

Even worse he got away unchallenged for blaming Bush for the North getting nuclear weapons. The blame properly belongs to Clinton.


2 posted on 10/01/2004 7:56:32 PM PDT by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Job03
Last time we had Bilateral talks with North Korea, as Kerry wants, they deceived US

The impression I get is that any coalition (or negotiating arrangement) that
John Forbes Kerry didn't construct are the ones he doesn't like.

I just hope that in the remaining debate that Dubya can make clear that
"It's just Kerry's world and we just happen to live in it."
3 posted on 10/01/2004 7:58:59 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Job03

To me Kerry's Korea declaration was the most startling event of the debates. Not only did he ignore the historical failure, but he ignored the fact that bilateral negotiations in this context is almost universally viewed as a strategic error by the diplomatic community. I am hard pressed to think of a case where a party has negotiated a separate peace out of strength. It is almost always a sign of weakness and collapse, which is precisely why the PRK has gone out of their way to insist on it. They couldn't believe their good fortune when the Clinton administration agreed to it and would do anything to regain such a position.
Holbrook likes it because his potential benefactor put it out there. He should have his sniveling diplomatic nose rubbed in dog doo for going along with this outrage!


4 posted on 10/01/2004 8:00:51 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Job03

O'Reilly hammered Richard Holbrooke with this tonight. He said that Kerry's plan for North Korea is just more of the same Clinton-Albright appeasement that allowed NK to gain nuclear weapons in the first place.


5 posted on 10/01/2004 8:01:51 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Job03
How can Kerry in the debate state that bilateral talks with North Korea could be successful, when in 1994 such negotiations failed to stop that country's nuclear ambitions?

Kerry's just a Coca-Cola candidate.

6 posted on 10/01/2004 8:12:14 PM PDT by Jaysun (It's getting hard to see through all of the "white out" on my screen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Job03

Kerry is a big fan of bilateral talks. Recall that he had his own personal bilateral talks with the North Vietnam communists in Paris.


7 posted on 10/01/2004 8:19:47 PM PDT by LSU Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
Even worse he got away unchallenged for blaming Bush for the North getting nuclear weapons. The blame properly belongs to Clinton...and Albright actually recently admitted that they were duped - so much debate ammunition left unused......
8 posted on 10/01/2004 9:09:05 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Job03

Didn't they walk out of the talks, and Albright chased them down the hall .. seems like I recall some kind of story like that.

And .. when Albright entered a room to meet with them they thought she was the maid ..??


9 posted on 10/01/2004 9:10:22 PM PDT by The Final Harvest (Sen.Miller said, "Bush is a God-fearing man with a good heart and a spine of tempered steel")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSU Engineer

Bush should have told Kerry the last time I remember you handling bilaterl talks we left several pow's in a communist country and never saw alot of them again.


10 posted on 10/01/2004 9:10:35 PM PDT by mammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson