Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Memogate: Why Did Dan Rather Do It?
Intellectual Conservative ^ | 2 October 2004 | Nicholas Stix

Posted on 10/02/2004 1:33:51 PM PDT by mrustow

Many alleged journalists don't see themselves as helping John Kerry win the election because they are socialists in journalistic drag, but because they believe that this is simply what any decent person in the same position would do.

In foisting the Memogate hoax on the American people, CBS' Dan Rather was motivated by the desire for ratings, revenge, and power. (For two excellent chronicles of how Rather misled his audience, see the reports here and here by Andrew Alexander, my editor at Intellectual Conservative.)

Ratings

Any journalist worth his salt wants to reach everyone, and blow away the competition. Anyone who says otherwise, is either lying or in the wrong business. The best way for a journalist to reach the largest possible audience is with scoops on scandals. It's good journalism, and it's popular journalism. One of the reasons why the pc journalism of the socialist mainstream media (SMSM) and even some of the older, Republican mainstream media (RMSM) have been losing audience share in recent years, is because editors kill or ignore scoops that expose corruption among protected minorities and women, or make those few reporters willing to report such corruption endure the death of a thousand cuts. The best chronicle of such SMSM corruption I know of, is William McGowan's book, Coloring the News: How Crusading for Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism.

Regarding the RMSM, consider National Review.  In an interview last year with Enter Stage Right's Bernard Chapin, NR contributor John Derbyshire observed that in the magazine's attempt to revitalize its subscriber base, the younger, affluent Republicans it had attracted will not tolerate articles that criticize blacks.

"They laugh with us when we lampoon the more outrageous kind of black race hustler -- a Sharpton, a Farrakhan, a Johnny Cochran. They are, however, determined to make the multiracial society work, they believe it can be made to work in spite of the hustlers and liberal guilt-mongers, and they are unwilling to read, say, or think anything that could be construed as unkind towards people of other races. The pessimism and cynicism on this topic that you rather commonly find among conservatives -- including NR readers -- born in 1930, or even 1950, are profoundly unappetizing to these younger conservatives."

There is an abundance of scoops involving protected groups that are easy pickins for anyone willing to do the work, and willing to endure the hate mail from black and Hispanic racists and white leftists, and willing to face the danger of one's work being found "profoundly unappetizing" by certain affluent Republicans. In addition to the moral outrage of the corruption itself, I write so much on corruption by members of protected groups, and the policies of police departments, newsrooms, schools and universities that protect the groups in question, because the stories are there for the telling, and MSM reporters won't tell them. Often, cowardly, lazy reporters from the RMSM refuse to tell them, as well, or don't know about them, and don't want to know. I've made a personal cottage industry out of the "racist, incompetent, black journalist" genre.

Double-standards and protection from scrutiny guarantee corruption, which among human beings requires little encouragement, to begin with.

The SMSM have sought to compensate for their indifference and even hostility towards so much news, by generating audience share through fabricating "scoops" targeting safe groups (white, heterosexual, able-bodied, particularly conservative males) that are either hoaxes or wild exaggerations.

The most common genre of such phony "scoops" is the race hoax. In recent years, one of the two most notorious, media-generated race hoaxes has been the claim by racist black leaders and organizations and alleged journalists that white police engage in the "racial profiling" of innocent black males. This hoax, which has been around in one form or another since the 1960s, took its contemporary form in 1999. The other most effective contemporary race hoax has been the myth of the 2000 disenfranchisement of black Florida voters, which was fabricated the day after George W. Bush won the election.

The classic recent case of creating a scoop via hype and the perversely dishonest interpretation of facts would be the Abu Ghraib prison "scandal," which was manufactured by none other than CBS News' Mary Mapes, the same producer who gave us Memogate/Rathergate. In the Abu Ghraib story, journalists demanded that the public see a little sexual degradation of prisoners as "torture." In any previous American war, including Vietnam, no self-respecting producer would have seen a story in Abu Ghraib. That Mapes will probably win every award in the book for it, is an unwitting statement on the moral collapse -- or should I say, "transformation"? -- of American journalism.

The "interpretational" aspect of the Abu Ghraib hype resided in outlets such as the New York Times lying about the Geneva Conventions, in insisting that terrorists, who are expressly denied Geneva Convention protections, were entitled to them.

Yet no matter how many frauds the SMSM perpetrate on the backs of heterosexual, white men, they continue to hemorrhage market share.

Note that Mapes could not have sold Abu Ghraib as a "scandal," were it not for an SMSM subculture which is prepared to interpret anything and everything connected to a Republican administration as ... well, scandalous.

Consider, for a current example of hoax through hype, the attempt, beginning in August by the New York Times, to conjure up a campaign by Florida law enforcement officers to intimidate elderly blacks out of voting. In what had all the earmarks of a coordinated campaign, within days of each other, columnists Bob Herbert and Paul Krugman and the Times editorial board insisted that when detectives interviewed the old folks in their homes as part of a voting fraud investigation, they weren't really trying to accommodate the senior citizens by relieving them of the need to travel to police headquarters (which would have been much more intimidating), but were actually trying to scare them to death. And how did the intrepid Timesmen know this? Because the detectives were carrying guns under their suit jackets! Imagine that, gun-toting detectives.

And so, the Times was not only inventing a race hoax, but piggybacking on top of the older, discredited, Florida 2000 race hoax. Imagine a convicted perjurer saying on the witness stand, "If you liked my former perjured testimony, let me give you some new stuff!" -- but without the irony.

As the newspaper's coordinated campaign last year to revitalize the Sally Hemings hoax had already shown, the Times has developed a specialty in reviving discredited race hoaxes.

To return to CBS News, for years it had been in a distant third place, behind NBC and ABC. At 11 p.m., CBS' New York affiliate has long been beaten by Seinfeld reruns! And then, with the coverage of the Republican National Convention, Fox beat all of the Big Three in the ratings, but it whipped CBS worst of all. Rather was livid about that beating.

Revenge

The Fox media empire, known as News Corp., is the creation of 73-year-old, Australian-born mogul, Rupert Murdoch. (Since being a foreigner was a hindrance to Murdoch's empire, in 1985, he became a U.S. citizen.)  Fox News started broadcasting on October 7, 1996; it was founded and is still run by 64-year-old, Ohio-born Republican Roger Ailes, who was media guru to presidents Nixon and Reagan. In 1988, while working for Vice President George Herbert Walker Bush, Ailes laid a trap for Rather. Ailes and Bush offered Rather an exclusive interview, but stipulated that it had to be live. As I wrote on July 31, 2001:

And then there was the Black Eye at Black Rock of the Bush interview. In 1988, media guru Roger Ailes suckered Rather into conducting a live interview with Vice President George Bush, then the Republican presidential candidate. Journalists don't like to conduct live interviews, because they then lose the power of the final cut. Being able to cut a story means being able to shape it. Instead, Ailes and Bush did the shaping, with Bush, in a politician's fantasy come true, going on the offensive, attacking Rather.

Dan Rather didn't know what hit him.

If you don't think Rather hasn't sought ever since to avenge himself against Ailes, then you haven't left Kansas. And as the Web site RatherBiased.com has shown, Rather has long been openly hostile towards George Bush the Elder, going back to before the 1988 interview. That hostility extends to the current President Bush.

But that doesn't mean Rather would knowingly participate in a hoax, just to harm the President. It does mean, however, that in his desire to continue his Texas vendetta, he let down his guard and his standards. My experience is that most people can be pretty vindictive (and yes, that applies to yours truly in spades), but powerful people are much more vindictive than the rest of us, and are able to give vent to their vindictiveness.

As former ABC News reporter Bob Zelnick wrote on September 29,

Without the documents there was no heart of the report, only thirty year-old hearsay. Without them the report would never have made 60 Minutes, or the Evening News, or for that matter, the Podunk Press. What was on display at CBS appears to have been a "get George Bush" mentality -- colleagues said Ms. Mapes had been working the story for five years -- compounded by the abdication of editorial responsibility by those who turn meek in the presence of Mr. Rather.

Indeed, Rather and his CBS colleagues are so openly hostile towards the President, that on September 23, at the height of Memogate/Rathergate, when Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi held a press conference in the White Hose Rose Garden, ABC, NBC, Fox and CNN covered the story, but CBS boycotted it.

Power

Rather also wanted the power of having broken the story that would decide the election. Again, although he is a socialist, that doesn't mean he saw himself as John Kerry's personal "plumber" (though Rather's 60 Minutes producer, Mary Mapes, may be another story). And yet, any reporter who succeeds at unearthing a major scandal, in which one of the major candidates is implicated, might just tip the election in the other candidate's favor, and guarantee the reporter a place in journalism's pantheon -- as long as the scandal implicates Pres. Bush!

Now, this may sound contradictory, but I believe that Rather sought to cost President Bush the election; not, however, in the sense of consciously seeing himself as a Democrat operative. Rather, he was -- along with many of his colleagues at CBS, ABC, and NBC -- engaging in self-deception. Many of the alleged journalists of the SMSM don't see themselves as helping John Kerry win the election because they are socialists in journalistic drag, but because they believe that this is simply what any decent person in the same position would do. That is how hermetically sealed off from the world their corrupt subculture is.

At the same time, though, many alleged journalists from that world do see themselves as political operatives, an attitude that is rooted in tradition. For a little historical perspective, the Founding Fathers were aware of the inherently political nature of the press, but felt that its positive contribution, in permitting public political discussion, and exposing corruption, outweighed its defects.

To my knowledge, America's first journalistic hoax, which was also her first race hoax, was perpetrated in 1802, by scandalmonger and extortionist James Thomson Callender against Thomas Jefferson, when President Jefferson refused to yield to Callender's demand that the latter be named postmaster of Richmond, Virginia. That was the Sally Hemings Hoax, whereby Callender claimed that Jefferson had fathered a child with a slave mistress, a hoax which 202 years later, still has "legs."

During roughly the first half of the 20th century, the terms "journalist," "publicist," and "propagandist" were used interchangeably in the U.S. and Europe. It was only due to the Nazis and Josef Goebbels' Reich Propaganda Ministry, that the term "propaganda" became a pejorative term.

For an example of how today's SMSM subculture operates, during the late 1990s, ABC News reporter Bob Zelnick started working on a book on then-Vice President Al Gore. Since Zelnick was not a socialist, and thus could not be relied on to write a book with the "correct" omissions, evasions, and conclusions, his bosses at ABC News ordered him to cease and desist from writing the book. Zelnick, a 22-year veteran of the network, had to resign from ABC in early 1998, in order to complete the book.

That's called "zero tolerance." Such repression would never have occurred, had Zelnick been working on a book on a powerful Republican. Had anyone at ABC News sought to muzzle such a book, the entire industry would have risen, outraged, in Zelnick's support. Instead, there was silence.

By the way, though Zelnick was involuntarily "retired" from journalism, he did manage to get work as the head of the journalism program at Boston University. As reported by Howard Kurtz in the September 21 Washington Post, Zelnick said of CBS' handling of Memogate:

"'There's one word I haven't heard so far: retraction. They've yielded inch by inch on the authenticity of the documents and the reliability of the source, but without the documents there was no story.' Until CBS retracts the story and apologizes directly to Bush, 'it mitigates the potential beneficial effect of an independent board.'"

The young Dan Rather would not have done the Memogate story. Memogate is a product of a time in which the media routinely publish as "news" insane accusations and baseless rumors, and specifically of an election season in which alleged journalists, often in collusion with Democrat party operatives, have engineered fraudulent "October surprises" on a monthly, and sometimes weekly basis. Over the past several years, journalism has been continually defined down, so that the difference between a fraud and an expose has largely been lost. Dan Rather was just going with the flow.

New York-based freelancer Nicholas Stix has written for Toogood Reports, Middle American News, the New York Post, Daily News, American Enterprise, Insight, Chronicles, Newsday and many other publications. His recent work is collected at The Critical Critic.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; danrather; georgehwbush; georgewbush; johnkerry; marymapes; mediabias; mediafraud; memogate; propaganda; rathergate

1 posted on 10/02/2004 1:33:52 PM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Peacerose; Shermy; Timesink; seamole; Fred25; Free ThinkerNY; ouroboros; ChaseR; A.J.Armitage; ...

I'd Rather not be Rather ping!


2 posted on 10/02/2004 1:36:11 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: princess leah; Johnny Gage; Nick Danger; Asmodeus; Belial; HAL9000; ~EagleNebula~; Azzurri; ...

Incoming!


3 posted on 10/02/2004 1:37:02 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen; joathome; Common Tator; Landru; Billthedrill; headsonpikes; DWSUWF; erizona; SuziQ; ...

Heads up!


4 posted on 10/02/2004 1:37:49 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

It's obvious the media is going all out to destroy Bush. They will lie and slander and don't care if they get caught, as in this memo forgery-which they knew many people they contacted said they were fake and Killian's family said they were fake, but they went ahead anyway. There is calculation through most of the media-CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, the major liberal papers, entertainment to deliberately attack Republicans. We've got a propaganda war going on with these people stopping at nothing. I am of the belief war needs to be declared on these organizations. They need to be rightly labelled Demonrat whores. They need to be confronted, sued for libel.


5 posted on 10/02/2004 1:38:27 PM PDT by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul; Lexington Green; mickie; van helsing; AmericanVictory; Octar; holden; glegakis; ...

Media fraud zing!


6 posted on 10/02/2004 1:38:45 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
It's obvious the media is going all out to destroy Bush. And they wonder why their influence is waining. They will be real toast after 02NOV.
7 posted on 10/02/2004 1:42:18 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Vietnam Veterans Reconciliation Day - 02NOV2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Rather has become nothing more than a pathetic old man, desperately trying to relive better times with one last "great story". How sad...
8 posted on 10/02/2004 1:42:33 PM PDT by snopercod ("I'm so proud to be a part of this great mass deception" --Frank Zappa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
It's obvious the media is going all out to destroy Bush. They will lie and slander and don't care if they get caught, as in this memo forgery-which they knew many people they contacted said they were fake and Killian's family said they were fake, but they went ahead anyway. There is calculation through most of the media-CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, the major liberal papers, entertainment to deliberately attack Republicans. We've got a propaganda war going on with these people stopping at nothing. I am of the belief war needs to be declared on these organizations. They need to be rightly labelled Demonrat whores. They need to be confronted, sued for libel.

Due to the Supreme Court's "Sullivan" decision in 1965 (yr?), it is almost impossible for a public figure to sue the media, based on what they have been doing to the President. The burden of proof is too high. (You'd probably require witnesses to testify that there had been meetings at which editors told staffers that they were going to get Bush, even though they knew they were lying about him.) With that said, however, the President can and must use the bully pulpit of the Presidency as Ronald Reagan did. If Bush loses the election, it be because he failed to do that.

9 posted on 10/02/2004 1:44:29 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Rather has become nothing more than a pathetic old man, desperately trying to relive better times with one last "great story". How sad...

It is sad, tragic even.

10 posted on 10/02/2004 1:45:51 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mark17; Travis McGee; Phil V.; bayourod; Angelwood; The Sword; The_Republican; YaYa123; ...

Incoming!


11 posted on 10/02/2004 1:46:54 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TomMix; innocentbystander; Hodar; DonQ; TLBSHOW; NorthernRight; sandmanbr; NoClones; sneakypete; ...

Heads up!


12 posted on 10/02/2004 1:47:57 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
"Memogate: Why Did Dan Rather Do It?"

After all my research for a full 8 seconds I came up with:

To persuade people to vote for Kerry!
13 posted on 10/02/2004 1:51:09 PM PDT by lyingisbetter ("Let's wait Kerry" or Let's go Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Tragic, true, but a confirmation that there is justice in the cosmos.

My wish is that Rather retires in Cuba to live out his days reflection and penance. A tarpaper shack should await all socialists like him...

14 posted on 10/02/2004 2:00:13 PM PDT by snopercod ("I'm so proud to be a part of this great mass deception" --Frank Zappa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lyingisbetter
"Memogate: Why Did Dan Rather Do It?"

After all my research for a full 8 seconds I came up with:

To persuade people to vote for Kerry!

LOL!

15 posted on 10/02/2004 2:08:10 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Tragic, true, but a confirmation that there is justice in the cosmos.

My wish is that Rather retires in Cuba to live out his days reflection and penance. A tarpaper shack should await all socialists like him...

Unfortunaterly, in the real world, rich socialists like Rather seek to force the rest of us to live in shacks, while they have datschas (sp?).

16 posted on 10/02/2004 2:09:55 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Starting with Edward R. Murrow, continuing through Walter Cronkike and then Dan Rather, the Tifnany network had always succeeded in destroying their political enemies.

Murrow defended Alger Hiss the communist spy, and got his accuser Joe McCarthy destroyed.

Walter Cronkite with his able assistant Dan Rather destroyed Richard Nixon..

It was assumed that Daniel Rather would defeat George W. Bush.

Rather has to face something this time that he and his predecessors never faced.. internet sites like FR, Talk Radio and the FNC.

Rather tried fighting todays war with yesterdays weapons. He destroyed himself with his own weapon. they had never been caught.

17 posted on 10/02/2004 2:13:55 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

.....Memogate: Why Did Dan Rather Do It?.......

Because he feels duty bound to do everything with his power as an oncamera personality to defeat George W Bush.

There is no substitute for victory. All measures legal and illegal, ethical and un ethical must be taken to win.

In 2000 he waited till too late and his boy algore lost.


18 posted on 10/02/2004 2:17:25 PM PDT by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

Now, it seems pretty obvious why he did it, doesn't it?


19 posted on 10/02/2004 2:20:52 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Memogate: Why Did Dan Rather Do It?

Because he could.

20 posted on 10/02/2004 2:26:32 PM PDT by GoLightly (If it doesn't kill ya, it makes ya stronger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
Murrow defended Alger Hiss the communist spy, and got his accuser Joe McCarthy destroyed.

Did Murrow really defend Hiss? Nixon, however, and not McCarthy, was Hiss's accuser (and prosecutor).

21 posted on 10/02/2004 2:26:58 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bert

Well, he and his comrades sure started early, this time 'round. They were unleashing October Surprises already in 2003!


22 posted on 10/02/2004 2:28:36 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

Well, that would sure make for a short article!


23 posted on 10/02/2004 2:29:28 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
the DEVIL made him do it!!!

seriously, he just couldn't help himself... nobody ever told him "if it sounds TOOOO good to be true, IT'S NOT TRUE!!!"

24 posted on 10/02/2004 2:40:08 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

LOL! It sounds like no one ever told a whole bunch of journos that line.


25 posted on 10/02/2004 3:06:54 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

Thanks for the ping!


26 posted on 10/02/2004 3:08:41 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

You bring more clarity to this. Many still believe that the MSM is not really that biased. They make the case that they are misguided or sloppy. We should long for the day when these fanatics are truly exposed and banned from all places where decent people gather!


27 posted on 10/02/2004 3:42:39 PM PDT by Grateful One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

That's another awesome piece of writing from Nicholas Stix.
Thanks much for the ping.


28 posted on 10/02/2004 4:05:02 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
ABC's 20/20 did a hit on the Bush family last night using the ex-wife of Neal, youngest brother of G.W. She is upset as she only gets $2,500 a month and may have to sell her house. What happened to working for a living?
29 posted on 10/02/2004 4:12:19 PM PDT by Yellow Rose of Texas (One man's conspiracy is another man's truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Good story, thanks for the post.

BTTT.

30 posted on 10/02/2004 4:24:11 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

FOX; We report, you decide. Rather: Here, swallow this!


31 posted on 10/02/2004 4:59:47 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

My pleasure.


32 posted on 10/02/2004 6:24:38 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Grateful One
You bring more clarity to this. Many still believe that the MSM is not really that biased. They make the case that they are misguided or sloppy. We should long for the day when these fanatics are truly exposed and banned from all places where decent people gather!

I think that a lot of people who are not socialists really don't want to knpw the truth about the media. Look at the veneration that Walter "Tet Offensive" Cronkite enjoyed. Look at the suburban Republicans who don't want to know what's really going on in the nation's cities.

33 posted on 10/02/2004 6:27:47 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Sure thing.

Yeah, 'tain't bad.

34 posted on 10/02/2004 6:38:52 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

Sure thing.


35 posted on 10/02/2004 6:39:29 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

BTTT


36 posted on 10/02/2004 7:08:35 PM PDT by hattend (I'm on the Mark Steyn Ping List! I'm somebody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow

Why did Rather do it?

Go to any one of your local institutions of higher learning and sit in on a class on journalistic integrity and you'll soon find out.

It's called "activist journalism", and it's the poison that has infiltrated all of the mainstream media since the 60's (and, consequently, made a website like this one absolutely necessary for anyone who wants to get their news undiluted by socialism and anti-Americanism). In fact, Rather (not) had a large hand in this himself 35-40 years ago.


37 posted on 10/02/2004 7:14:46 PM PDT by RockAgainsttheLeft04 ("Kiss my ass, all you liberals." -Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
One of the all time great moments in TV history:

And then there was the Black Eye at Black Rock of the Bush interview. In 1988, media guru Roger Ailes suckered Rather into conducting a live interview with Vice President George Bush, then the Republican presidential candidate. Journalists don't like to conduct live interviews, because they then lose the power of the final cut. Being able to cut a story means being able to shape it. Instead, Ailes and Bush did the shaping, with Bush, in a politician's fantasy come true, going on the offensive, attacking Rather.

38 posted on 10/02/2004 8:02:34 PM PDT by GOPJ (The effect of‘MSM bias’ is the Democratic party and the press sustain each other’s delusions. Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockAgainsttheLeft04
It's called "activist journalism", and it's the poison that has infiltrated all of the mainstream media since the 60's

Actually, it goes back to the 1950's, documented by muckraking author Vance Packard in The Opinionmakers in the 1960's. The Columbia School of Journalism surveys their students annually, and one of the questions asked is why they entered journalism. The political motive became evident in the 1950's, and it had increased to a majority in the 1960's. The proportion has increased to more than 90% since he wrote his book (as shown in periodical articles addressing the same subject that have been published since then), and now the vast majority of working journalists are politically motivated and overwhelmingly liberal, thus poisoning the well of public opinion against traditional American values. It's amazing we aren't France already, so strong is the tilt toward moral anomie, internationalism and socialism in media.

39 posted on 10/02/2004 8:22:12 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Look at the veneration that Walter "Tet Offensive" Cronkite enjoyed.

That old ph*rt stood up in front of a camera after a one-week whirlwind visit to Vietnam and threw a war! And to make things worse, we were winning when he did it.

To this day, whenever I see Cronkite's face, that's the only thing I can think about.

40 posted on 10/02/2004 8:25:32 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mrustow; onyx; maica; Freee-dame; Grampa Dave; Eaker; wardaddy; Robert_Paulson2; risk; neverdem

Bravo!


41 posted on 10/02/2004 8:34:55 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Thanks for the ping!


42 posted on 10/02/2004 8:44:15 PM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: risk

You bet!


43 posted on 10/02/2004 8:56:48 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Robert A. Cook, PE

Rather hoisted on his own petard in short order. Priceless!


44 posted on 10/02/2004 9:34:01 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

got the ping.
read the article.
the site went down.
thanks travis.


45 posted on 10/03/2004 9:59:05 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RockAgainsttheLeft04
Why did Rather do it?

Go to any one of your local institutions of higher learning and sit in on a class on journalistic integrity and you'll soon find out.

It's called "activist journalism", and it's the poison that has infiltrated all of the mainstream media since the 60's (and, consequently, made a website like this one absolutely necessary for anyone who wants to get their news undiluted by socialism and anti-Americanism). In fact, Rather (not) had a large hand in this himself 35-40 years ago.

Thanks for bringing that up. With all of the talk about "bias," I never hear the term "activist journalism," even though it is the key to the bias.

46 posted on 10/03/2004 1:24:18 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
It's called "activist journalism", and it's the poison that has infiltrated all of the mainstream media since the 60's

Actually, it goes back to the 1950's, documented by muckraking author Vance Packard in The Opinionmakers in the 1960's. The Columbia School of Journalism surveys their students annually, and one of the questions asked is why they entered journalism. The political motive became evident in the 1950's, and it had increased to a majority in the 1960's. The proportion has increased to more than 90% since he wrote his book (as shown in periodical articles addressing the same subject that have been published since then), and now the vast majority of working journalists are politically motivated and overwhelmingly liberal, thus poisoning the well of public opinion against traditional American values. It's amazing we aren't France already, so strong is the tilt toward moral anomie, internationalism and socialism in media.

I'll have to check out Packard. I know that he was the most popular journalist in America for a while, and he coined the term "planned obsolescence," which I think was hype. (He acted as though people bought new cars all the time, because the cars weren't built to last, rather than that people could AFFORD new cars every few years.)

47 posted on 10/03/2004 2:10:35 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Look at the veneration that Walter "Tet Offensive" Cronkite enjoyed.

That old ph*rt stood up in front of a camera after a one-week whirlwind visit to Vietnam and threw a war! And to make things worse, we were winning when he did it.

To this day, whenever I see Cronkite's face, that's the only thing I can think about.

The face of the modern (pre-Internet, pre-cable) media.

48 posted on 10/03/2004 2:13:56 PM PDT by mrustow ("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson