Replies

John Kerry thinks nuclear proliferation - not terrorism - is the greatest security threat facing America. He said so in the first debate. He said in order to show sincerity about stopping proliferation he would END U.S. research into underground nuclear bunker busters. Kerry thinks America having nuclear weapons is akin to terrorists and rogue regimes having them. HE DISPLAYS THE INTOLERABLE EVIL OF ALL MORAL RELATIVISTS, EXACTLY WHAT COULD LEAD TO THE SUICIDE OF CIVILIZATION.

He's been consistent about one thing -- believing in disarming America -- because his attitude is that America is evil or really capable of it and must be cut down to size -- to be on a par with France and dictatorships run by nutcases and islamo-fascists.

Here's the part of the debate where he talked about killing yet another weapons system:
http://snipurl.com/9hf0

Here's an excellent commentary on it by Bill Hobbs:
http://billhobbs.com/hobbsonline/004622.html

For Kerry to even "contemplate" giving the Iranian ayatollahs enriched uranium is INSANITY of the worst order. It's worse than his insisting that any so-called pre-emptive action requires "passing a global test. It's even worse than Jimmy Carter's thinking we could bank on the North Koreans' promise to him not to develop nuclear weapons. These are the kinds of suicidal ideas that George Orwell said only an intellectual could believe -- "because no one else could be such a fool."

“I’m an internationalist,” Kerry told The Harvard Crimson in 1970. “I’d like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.” -- see http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=357339

Kerry's ACTIONS for the past 30 years are consistent, but his WORDS are not. He has ALWAYS felt the same way. His words are not consistent for one very good reason; he must distract the voters with a few pro-American comments now and then to obscure how fundamentally anti-supremacy he really is and always has been. That's why he habitually says "but" after every strong-sounding comment he makes (see: http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110005704 )

(BTW, according to http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2004/0413.asp the Adam Clymer mentioned in the piece is the same guy as "Big Time.")

also see: http://freedomkeys.com/propagandist.htm (which is just as easy to copy and email as this post is)