Posted on 10/04/2004 7:49:27 PM PDT by Perdogg
Loftus says that the documents are a "bomb shell" and that they back the claims made by Bodansky.
The documents are from Saddam's Military Intelligence (Al-Istikhbarat al-Askariyya).
No word from the LAME STREAM MEDIA!!
If events follow historical precedent, though, Bush and Rumsfeld will disavow them.
Well... CNS better make sure these files are vetted to the extreme... and then they better pass them to the MSM... time's a wasting...
exactly right - its a non story until the administration makes a case for it.
Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
(CNSNews.com) - Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by U.S. forces and obtained by CNSNews.com, show numerous
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The election is Over- Kerry knew about this as a Senator on the Intelligence Commitee and he LIED, LIED!
http://www.cnsnews.com/
The timing is suspicious.... </ daschle>
The CNS News article Loftus referenced:
Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
CNSNews | October 4, 2004 | Scott Wheeler
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1234720/posts
If events follow historical precedent, though, Bush and Rumsfeld will disavow them.
Keep in mind the story 60 Minutes bumped for the fraudlent Bush Guard story was one that took the Bush team to task for being taken in by forged documents. Lost of forgeries coming out of Iraq these days. Let's not get too carried away until they are authenticated.
Please post link to Bodansky claim.
Who is Loftus?
John Loftus is a raving lunatic. Somehow I knew this would come from him.
And Bodansky has been wrong so many times I'd run outside to check if he told me the sky was blue.
I wonder if the White House is preparing for that Rose Garden announcement, or better yet, a Presidential News Conference.
Fox News discussing live on 770 AM NYC right now.
Shove this October suprise, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Rather.
Hey there Perdogg....sounds like a good one. Wonder if there is enough chems to make a good case for WMD? What ya' think?
they risk having it looked too contrived, too staged, this close to the election.
the perfect forum would be at saddam's trial.
What is Loftus?
Saddam ordered mustard gas and anthrax in 2001!!!!!!
Shield, don't be silly! The tin-man said the other day there were no wmd in Iraq. ;)
OK...I hear you loud and clear. Great name for him...Tin Man...LOL now that's funny. My favorite name for him is dickhead. Tin man also called our President a liar...what a complete assh*le he really is.
Can you tell me why you think they do this?
Monica Crowley reports that Rumsfeld STUNNED the press room by refusing to answer question about SH AQ ties.
why stunned?
Did he refuse or did he deny there were any? (I hadn't heard about this)
because they know the environment - that unless the evidence is overwhelming, it would be a political negative because the media would cut them up. as opposed to clinton claiming "genocide" as an excuse for bombing Serbia - accepted as fact by the media.
Rumsfeld doesn't talk about things he hasn't researched.
He simply refused to say one way or another.
Wait a minute--Isn't there an article posted already that claims Rummy says there isn't any ties between SH and AQ? Maybe I read the headline wrong or I'm going senile...
AP/Yahoo versus Monica Crowley. She was there. Your call.
I think I've lost count of how many times AP LIED!!!
C-B.S. is bad, but AP is still getting away with its deceit!
Loftus is a democratic hack who's already said he's voting for Kerry. Take what he says with a large grain of salt is my opinion.
BUMP to keep following this with fingers crossed!
This sounds like the BIG october surprise or the beggining of it..and loftus is a dem,who says this is damning and a slam dunk!!
"Wait a minute--Isn't there an article posted already that claims Rummy says there isn't any ties between SH and AQ? Maybe I read the headline wrong or I'm going senile..."
The reporter for this article was mistating what Rumsfeld actually said (just wishful thinking on the part of the reporter).
Monica Crowley was actually there. She said he wouldn't commit himself. He just said that he was astonished at the way CIA reports had migrated from one position to another.
CNS is going to publish the document. They'll be all over the net before the Alphabet Soup networks know what hit them.
this was a big quote of hers--He said he had seen intelligence on that “migrate in amazing ways” in the past year, adding that there were ”many differences of opinion in the intelligence community.” He did not elaborate on that but said relationships among terrorists “evolve and change over time.”
i think and hope that bushies are setting a huge trap for Lurch..i can't believe poof no WMD's after all we saw in the 80's-90's
how could he know?? he was never at the meetings..he missed all but 2
Why would they do that ..??
With Loftus being a dem .. it could be a set-up!
ping
When Loftus say he was voting for Kerry? He trashed Kerry in the summer, he said he 'supported' Edwards in the primary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.