Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUELFER REPORT ON IRAQ RENDERS KERRY "A COMPLACENT FOOL" OR "AN UTTER FRAUD"
10/8/04 | Mia T

Posted on 10/08/2004 4:43:01 PM PDT by Mia T

DUELFER REPORT ON IRAQ RENDERS KERRY "A COMPLACENT FOOL" OR "AN UTTER FRAUD"

Don't take the word of your lazy rolling-news update anchor or the AP rewrite guy on the Duelfer findings on Iraq. Instead, read the report for yourself. It is an amazing document. It renders John Kerry, on foreign policy and national security, either a complacent fool or an utter fraud. It's not about WMD, it's about the top-to-toe corruption of the entire international system by Saddam Hussein. The "global test" is a racket, and anybody who puts faith in it is jeopardizing America's national security. If the lazy US media won't pick up this story now, shame on them.

THE U.N. NEEDS TO BE DESTROYED
MarkSteynOnline | 10/7/04 | Mark Steyn


pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

by Mia T, 5.15.04


 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

 

As long as you've got a rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag.

--Elizabeth Rickard

 

The $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food program was by far the largest relief operation in the history of the United Nations. By extension, it's rapidly becoming the U.N.'s largest-ever scandal....

Those included rewarding friends and allies world-wide with oil allocations on very favorable terms, as well as extracting large kickbacks from oil traders and suppliers of humanitarian goods....

There can be little doubt that U.N. mismanagement contributed greatly to the negative perception of the anti-Saddam containment policy. There is also little doubt that the reward and kickback scheme--as well the possibility of exposure--was a factor as some countries weighed whether to back U.S.-led regime change in Iraq. There is even reason to suspect that some of the Saddam friends and allies who benefited may have been members of the U.N. Secretariat.

Oil for Scandal
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:01 a.m.

eave it to the French to make pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic all the rage.

They and their moneygrubbing, Oil-for-Food defrauding cohorts abroad, and their power-hungry would-be terrorist sympathizers here, are all sporting "THE LOOK."

(How many of those oh so trendy Kerry-clinton-Kennedy hate-America, blame-America-first sound bites will Al-Jazeera broadcast today?)

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one,
(as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.


WHICH DANGEROUS MAN?

 

by Mia T, 10.08.04

 

Est-ce que je peux?
préemption et l'essai global

POURQUOI JOHN KERRY EST DANGEREUX POUR L'AMÉRIQUE


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)


NEW! compleatjohnkerry.blogspot.com

NEW! unfitforcommand.blogspot.com

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Issues & Insights

Friday, October 8, 2004

A Dangerous Man

Iraq: You wouldn't know it from the headlines, but the new WMD report explains why Saddam Hussein was a threat and why the U.S. was right to remove him.

Arms inspector Charles Duelfer has just delivered the most exhaustive findings so far on Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. As anyone even faintly aware of the report must know by now, Duelfer and his team found no WMD stockpiles and concluded that Iraqi WMD capability was "essentially destroyed" after the 1991 Gulf War.

The anti-war media have been quick to seize on that angle, kicking off stories with agitprop leads like this one from The Associated Press' Ken Guggenheim:

"Contradicting the main argument for a war that has cost more than 1,000 American lives, the top U.S. arms inspector said Wednesday he found no evidence that Iraq produced any weapons of mass destruction after 1991."

Fortunately, we live in the Internet era where Americans can easily find the facts. The Duelfer report is online at http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/index.html, with good summaries in "Key Findings" and the Duelfer's "Transmission Letter."

Drawing not just on inspections but also on debriefings of regime officials -- including Saddam himself -- Duelfer gives us the best window yet into the dictator's long-term strategy. From all sources the message was clear: Saddam's first order of business, after his own survival, was to break the United Nations sanctions so that he could resume the WMD program. He came close to succeeding.

Forced to scrap most of his WMD after the first Gulf War, Saddam, Duelfer says, took pains to preserve know-how so that production could start quickly when sanctions were lifted. Sanctions lasted longer than Saddam had hoped, but by the end of the 1990s, his propaganda and bribery program -- the U.N. oil-for-food program came in handy -- had done its work. The sanctions were cracking.

After 9-11, with sharp prodding from the U.S., the U.N. rediscovered its backbone for a time and forced him to re-admit inspectors. Saddam's French and Russian allies insisted that the inspections run their course. The U.S. and Britain decided on war instead.

That decision has never looked better than it does now.

If Saddam's friends had prevailed, the inspections would have played into his hands. Having mothballed his WMD program, he would have received the U.N.'s clean bill of health and the sanctions would have been lifted.

In short order, he would have restarted his chemical, biological and nuclear programs, with plenty of oil money to buy materials and produce quick results. His contacts with al-Qaida might then have firmed up into an operational alliance. And the U.S. would be begging fruitlessly for global action, as it now does with Iran.

The situation in Iraq today, as President Bush likes to say, is "tough." But it's not the strategic nightmare that it would have been if Saddam had been allowed to stay.

On Wednesday, Sen. John Warner asked Duelfer if he thought the world is better off with Saddam out of power. "I'm an analyst, and I realize I'm in a political world right now," Duelfer began.

But Warner pressed him further, and Duelfer went on: "But I have to agree. Analytically, the world is better off."

His report, in its scrupulously impartial way, makes just that point.





 

addam Hussein was a lethally dangerous man.

This is the inescapable, bottom-line conclusion of arms inspector Charles Duelfer. (Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD, 30 September 2004)

If we accept Duelfer's findings, then we must also accept the corollary: If Saddam Hussein was a lethally dangerous man, then so too is John Kerry. A Commander-in-Chief Kerry would never have acted preemptively to remove Saddam Hussein.

For this reason, old media, arthritic and in the throes of death even before it was Dan Rathered, is ignoring the essence of the Duelfer report, focusing instead on "no WMDs"-- a matter of relevance to presidential fitness only insofar as it exposes Kerry's lack thereof. (A relevance, which, of course, old media is choosing to ignore.) During his 34 years on the public stage, John Kerry did his damnedest to decimate America's intelligence (as well as military) capacity to confront the enemy.

John Kerry is a lethally dangerous man.

FROM NOW UNTIL NOVEMBER 2ND, it is critical that George Bush and Dick Cheney frame the ENTIRE DEBATE ON THE WAR ON TERROR AND ON THE LETHAL DANGER THAT A COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF KERRY WOULD POSE FOR OUR COUNTRY, FOR OUR CHILDREN, FOR THE WORLD.


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004



 


election update!
JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT~THE SERIES

WHICH DANGEROUS MAN?

YOO-HOO! SECURITY MOMS:
THE TERRORISTS ARE TARGETING YOUR KIDS!

DEBATE ONE
NO GYP SHEET


Est-ce que je peux?
préemption et l'essai global

KERRY'S "GLOBAL TEST" FOR PREEMPTION:
WHY SECURITY MOMS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH


Diane Sawyer Nails Kerry Peril
PREEMPTION + KERRY'S EX POST FACTO REASONING

WINDSURFER WATERLOO
why the surfboard--not the snowboard--is (to mix war metaphors) Kerry's Achilles' heel

Windsurfing in the Persian Gulf

John "One Position on Iraq" Kerry's 1971 Replay

YOO-HOO DAN RATHER!
KERRY'S BELATED "HONORABLE" DISCHARGE:
Is a less-than-honorable discharge and clinton "pardon" behind Kerry's refusal to sign form 180 to release ALL of his records?

RATHERGATE IS ANOTHER WATERGATE: The Nexus

CARL BERNSTEIN: RATHERGATE MAY BE ANOTHER WATERGATE

CLUELESS: O'REILLY AND PODHORETZ ON RATHERGATE

THE KERRY-RATHER-BARNES FORGERIES DECONSTRUCTED

HEAR THE FIRST VEEP DEBATE NOW! (the whole ball of wax)
CHENEY WARNS AMERICA: THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT OUR SURVIVAL
KERRY-EDWARDS TRIES TO SHUT DOWN DEBATE

KERRY'S VIETNAM FIXATION
PART 1: advice from bill

Kerry's new W offensive

YOO-HOO! UNDECIDEDS + "PERSUADABLES"
HEAR THE SPEECH JOHN KERRY DOESN'T WANT YOU TO HEAR

(WHY INFORMED, RATIONAL DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE FOR BUSH)

DECONSTRUCTING ZELL MILLER

EXPLOITING MAX CLELAND

Kerry is UNFIT #21: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
BOARDHEAD TO THE RESCUE


The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


Kerry is UNFIT #20: THUMBSUCKER SERIES
PREEMPTION-
(the whole ball of wax)

CONTEMPLATING KERRY'S "GUT"

A PRESIDENT KERRY MAY BE ABHORRENT
...BUT IS IT EVEN CONSTITUTIONAL?


getting kerry's goat
john kerry lacks presidential temperament

Two Psychologists on Kerry: Dangerous on National Security

YOO-HOO! followthemoney.org. . .
OVER HERE!

"bombastic ass" is not the antidote to "boorish ass"
(or why Keith Olbermann Cannot Do Cleanup for Chris Matthews)

UNFIT #19:
JOHN KERRY'S "MORE SENSITIVE WAR ON TERROR"

THE COMPLEAT JOHN KERRY
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

Kerry, NOT Bush, paralyzed by 9/11 attacks
Hear Kerry admit he could not think

THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 3
UNFIT #10: 9/10 mindset


THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES 2
KERRY-DEMOCRAT CONTEMPT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY[annotated]


THE DEMOCRATS-ARE-GONNA-GET-US-KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES1

dox in sox on lummox in box on fox

THE REAL "REAL DEAL"
(what Kerry's commanders and crewmates REALLY think of him--with transcripts)

Did John Kerry pick a running mate or hire a lawyer when he selected John Edwards?

THE MAN FROM HOPE: been there, done that

"Hope is on the way!" (the scoop)

THE TERRORISTS' USEFUL IDIOTS
all the usual suspects


A Vote for Kerry is a Vote for the Terrorists

ELECTION BOTTOM LINE:
TERRORIST SYMPATHIZER or TERRORIST ANNIHILATOR

JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES: 8/10/04 UPDATE!
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief


JOHN KERRY IS UNFIT SERIES:
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief


UNFIT #9-JOHN KERRY: DEADLY OPPORTUNIST
SELF-CONFESSED WAR CRIMlNAL MORPHS INTO SELF-PROMOTER WAR HERO


UNFIT #6: The Deadly Kerry-Hollywood Axis
HOW CAN YOU PUT YOUR CHILDREN'S LIVES IN ITS HANDS?


UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#1-making the tough choices in a post-9/11 world
UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#2-understanding the job description

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#3-sang-froid and the "nuclear" button

UNFIT: taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
#4 - Kerry champions tolerance for terrorists


sanitizing evil
Kerry Cabal Censors Nick Berg Decapitation


"Loose Cannon" Kerry's AWOL/PURPLE-HEART FRAUD

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic

USEFUL IDIOTS

MOORE IS LESS--THE MOVIE

The Cycle of Violence:
NOW WITH HYPERLINKED INSTRUCTION MANUAL


JOHN KERRY'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans


bill clinton, boy "genius," unwittingly bares all on BBC

deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"

vetting missus clinton...

The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick

nepotism + tokenism = a nancy pelosi
(or a hillary clinton)

Kerry's Belated Condemnation Focuses on Process
Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Condemn Content

"CRY BUSH" + Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
What are the Dems up to?


DON'T BELIEVE YOUR LYING EARS (The Perjurer Returns)
(Clinton: Claims I Turned Down Bin Laden are 'Bull')

The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance


What is the REAL Reason for Gorelick's Wall?

giant sucking sound
KERRY MAKES DUKAKIS LOOK CONSERVATIVE, SMART + JUDICIOUS


Q ERTY6 utter failureBUMP

Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism


MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror

(Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?)

The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)

UDAY: "The end is near… this time I think the… Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."

 

 

MORE

 


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: duelferreport; fool; fraud; iraq; kerry; kofiannan; marksteyn; oilforfood; oilforfoodscandal; un; wmd

1 posted on 10/08/2004 4:43:01 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; jla; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

ping


2 posted on 10/08/2004 4:45:02 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Bump


3 posted on 10/08/2004 4:48:07 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Beautiful work!


4 posted on 10/08/2004 4:50:18 PM PDT by Sunshine55 (Why would you choose the donkey to be the symbol for your party? Was the sheep already taken?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
With a million signatures on a petition to evict the UN, the Congress will have to address it. The UN's facility is supported primarily by US taxpayers money and by our Constitution taxpayers can vote to repeal unfair taxation's.
5 posted on 10/08/2004 4:55:48 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

.

It's...

KILL'em over there...

or they...

KILL us over here.

.


6 posted on 10/08/2004 4:57:20 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

The details of the magnitude of the corruption in the U.N. -- France in particular, with three of its officials ON THE TAKE FROM SADDAM TO ENSURE A "NO" VOTE TO INVADE IRAQ ON THE SECURITY COUNCIL -- IS TOTALLY DISPICABLE. OUR MEN WERE DYING IN IRAQ, TO FREE IRAQ AND REMOVE SADDAM, WHILE THE FRENCH WERE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR TO STAY AWAY.

THE U.S. SHOULD BREAK DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH FRANCE UNTIL THE CHIRAC GOVERNMENT IS REPLACED. SECONDLY, THE U.N. SHOULD BE THROWN OUT OF THE UNITED STATES, WITHOUT ANY REMORSE OR REGRETS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.


7 posted on 10/08/2004 5:11:05 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

WHY SHOULD ONE MORE U.S. TAXPAYER DOLLAR GO INTO SUPPORTING THE U.N. ???? I CAN NAME MANY REASONS IT SHOULD NOT, INCLUDING THE LIVES OF MANY GOOD AMERICAN SOLDIERS.

THROW THE CORRUPT, ANTI-AMERICAN BUMS OUT OF THIS COUNTRY!!


8 posted on 10/08/2004 5:12:52 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I've read the report (as well as the 9-11 Commission report) cover to cover, including footnotes, and the conclusion is inescapable that it "hammers" the president and his conduct. It is the "head-in-the-sand" posture that dominates here that is a strange and dangerous wishful thinking. Whistling passed the the graveyard may be a comfort, but the failure to recognize the hard truth is setting oneself up for a disappointment.


9 posted on 10/08/2004 5:21:35 PM PDT by middie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

For ted kennedy, the UN has established the Drinking for Oil Program and the "leaving dead women in cars in a river and not reporting it until some time later" for food program


10 posted on 10/08/2004 5:37:31 PM PDT by CouncilofTrent (Quo Primum...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I vote for "utter fraud". Nobody is that stupid.


11 posted on 10/08/2004 5:42:21 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: middie

It is not the president's conduct that is at issue here, It is France's. And Russia's. And China's And Kofi Annan's. And...

The UN Oil-For-Food corruption renders minister without portfolio without premises, postures and policies, as well.


12 posted on 10/08/2004 5:43:31 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

BTTT!!


13 posted on 10/08/2004 5:48:33 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Heck with the petition, I think American's should go and evict the UN right now! I'd be proud to escort Annan out myself. Maybe Kerry should go with them?
14 posted on 10/08/2004 5:50:53 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


15 posted on 10/08/2004 6:02:50 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
DUELFER REPORT ON IRAQ RENDERS KERRY "A COMPLACENT FOOL" OR "AN UTTER FRAUD"

I am sure that you appreciate the fact that these two possibilities are not mutually exclusive. In fact, there is ample evidence that both are actually true.

16 posted on 10/09/2004 6:47:49 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS", Fake But Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

bump ;)


17 posted on 10/09/2004 7:17:52 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson