Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sinclair to air anti-Kerry special (Stolen Honor)
Washington Times ^ | Oct. 9, 2004 | UPI

Posted on 10/09/2004 4:26:55 PM PDT by FairOpinion

New York, NY, Oct. 9 (UPI) -- A conservative U.S. broadcaster whose outlets reach one-quarter of the nation's TV viewers is airing a film that attacks John Kerry just before the election.

Sinclair Broadcast Group has ordered its 62 stations to preempt regular programming during primetime to air "Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal," the Los Angeles Times reported Saturday.

The film, funded by Pennsylvania veterans and produced by a veteran and former Washington Times reporter, features former POWs accusing Kerry -- a decorated U.S. Navy veteran who later protested the war -- of worsening their ordeal by prolonging the conflict.

The one-hour special, which will be aired between Oct. 21 and Oct. 24 depending on the city, will be followed by a panel discussion to which Kerry will be invited, potentially satisfying fairness regulations, the Times reported.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kerry; protest; sinclair; stolenhonor; vietnam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-198 next last
To: FairOpinion

**conservative U.S. broadcaster -- Sinclair**

Wish we had an email to say thank you to them.


101 posted on 10/09/2004 6:08:11 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

In ordinary times I'd agree with you. Today, there is way too much bias in the mainstream media to even make a pretence of objectivity. When we have CBS collaborating with the Kerry campaign and ABC making a policy decision to cover Bush's inconsistencies but not Kerry's, then in effect we have Moore's bias whether or not his movie is on tv.


102 posted on 10/09/2004 6:08:53 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

From post 23:

Make sure you show your support. Drop them a line and let them know you are behind them 100 percent! http://www.sbgi.net/contact/contact.shtml

Corporate Headquarters
Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.
10706 Beaver Dam Road
Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030
410-568-1500 (Main Telephone)
410-568-1533 (Main Fax)

Investor Relations Contact
Lucy A. Rutishauser
VP Corporate Finance and
Corporate Treasurer
investor@sbgi.net

Sales Questions
Darren Shapiro
VP Sales
410-568-1500

-or-
Jeff Sleete
VP Marketing
410-568-1500

Web Site Concerns
Mike O'Malley
Corporate Webmaster
webmaster@sbgi.net


103 posted on 10/09/2004 6:13:13 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude; killjoy

You'd better understand if you realized that
Viet Nam Vets has been smeared for 35 + years.

Now it's payback time.


104 posted on 10/09/2004 6:19:23 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (GET OUT THE VOTE NOV 2 ! IF YOUR NEIGHBORS OR RELATIVES NEED A RIDE TO THE POLLS OFFER TO HELP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Thanks for posting.
The Los Angeles Times has a Page One article today about how G-wd-Awful it is that
Sinclair is broadcasting the truth during an election campaign.


105 posted on 10/09/2004 6:21:18 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

So what are you suggesting? That Moore's crap stays out there but we shouldn't counteract it with the truth?

Are you French?


106 posted on 10/09/2004 6:22:37 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
Today, there is way too much bias in the mainstream media to even make a pretence of objectivity.

It is my understanding that this "Holy Grail" of "Objective" journalism is a very recent phenomenon.

Throughout history, the press...the town criers etc., were very upfront about where their interest lay and what agenda they were trying to foster.

With any luck, we'll get back to this traditional "truth in advertising".....

Less "sneaky" that way.....(i.e. Walter "bet you didn't know I was a commie" Cronkite)

107 posted on 10/09/2004 6:23:59 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
How would you feel if a competitor decided to do the same thing with Fahrenheit 9/11?

You must be a life long Republican. I think this is great but I have some Democrat viciousness in my genes. The rats dumped the DUI thing without compassion. I wish we had a video of Kerry in full face makeup doing a Hermann Goering dressing gown runway show.

108 posted on 10/09/2004 6:26:41 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: saluki_in_ohio
bump for the truth about the Presidential candidate that works in a style reminiscent of
Jinghis Khan.
109 posted on 10/09/2004 6:26:50 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; MeekOneGOP; potlatch; ntnychik; devolve; Happy2BMe; Boazo; OXENinFLA; ...


Off to Vietnam...on an Asian tour
There is a museum...you must see for sure
There's a place of honor...he's a traitor, we say
North Vietnam dreamin'...a Winter Soldier day

Kerry's picture's there...he helped them in the war
And along with Hanoi Jane...he's someone we abhor
They have him in an honored place...he's traitor scum, we say
North Vietnam dreamin'...a Winter Soldier day

He turned on brave men...stabbed them in the back
Torturers he helped...they gave him a plaque
There's a place of honor...traitor scum, we say
North Vietnam dreamin'...a Winter Soldier day
A Winter Soldier day...a Winter Soldier day





110 posted on 10/09/2004 6:28:44 PM PDT by Smartass (BUSH & CHENEY 2004 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: killjoy
What makes me uneasy is the tit-for-tat that is going on. I think there comes a time when you take the moral high road, rest on your message, and let that speak for itself. This applies to both sides.

Do you have any - ANY - influence on the "other side"? Enough to get them to quit with their lies? I suggest that you use it and give up your naive "can't we all just get along" crap. It's war, in case you haven't noticed. It's the DNC, the RAT 527's, Moore, the MSM against us.

And then, get a life.

111 posted on 10/09/2004 6:28:55 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: VOA; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Thanks. I found the LAT article.

Conservative TV Group to Air Anti-Kerry Film

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-sinclair9oct09,1,3230034.story?coll=la-headlines-nation

NEW YORK — The conservative-leaning Sinclair Broadcast Group, whose television outlets reach nearly a quarter of the nation's homes with TV, is ordering its stations to preempt regular programming just days before the Nov. 2 election to air a film that attacks Sen. John F. Kerry's activism against the Vietnam War, network and station executives familiar with the plan said Friday.

===

Gee, I don't know, how does anyone dare to speak out against Kerry's "activism against the Vietnam War".

(major sarcasm)


112 posted on 10/09/2004 6:32:30 PM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: All
"It's beyond yellow journalism," said Kerry spokesman David Wade. "It's a smear bankrolled by Republican money, and I don't think Americans will stand for it."

What a CRYBABY! Where was this concern for "yellow journalism" when CBS used phony memos to smear Bush? Instead of whining, why don't they accept Sinclair's offer to offer the other side, unless there is NO other side!

113 posted on 10/09/2004 6:40:05 PM PDT by Sister_T (Democrats AND The Partisan Press are the REAL enemies to freedom in the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Gee, I don't know, how does anyone dare to speak out against Kerry's
"activism against the Vietnam War".


(Kerry bombast-voice emulator):
"How...dare...you...question the denigration of 'diversity of opinion'
by my operatives in the media? How crushingly intolerant of you!"

(end my round of sarcasm)
114 posted on 10/09/2004 6:42:02 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

115 posted on 10/09/2004 6:45:25 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Used to be sciencediet but found the solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers

Journalism itself started in the 1600s in Amsterdam (connected with financial-related information for traders).

It became important in the US around the time of the American Revolution. At that time, newspapers had names like the "Mail Advertiser". They had mostly advertisements on the front page, and articles inside, including letters from correspondents far away, reporting on events elsewhere in the US or in Europe. You can examine these newspapers at the New-York Historical Society if you have a student ID (at least you could in the early 1980s).

Around the turn of the 20th Century, so-called "yellow journalism" reached its extreme with the Hearst newspapers lobbying for the Spanish-American war. Shortly after that, the ideal of objectivity became the goal. There were some exceptions, like the Chicago Tribune, which advocated the eccentric views of Col. McCormick, but by and large objectivity seemed to work.

In the 1960s and 1970s, newspaper and media ownership consolidated, and the biases of one group became much more important than they had been previously, when no one news agency controlled more than its own market.

The internet, webloggers and FreeRepublic, where anyone can comment on any news story, have exposed the lack of objectivity in a new way. At present, about 100 years after objectivity became so important, and about 200 years after news media themselves became important, the ideal seems to be evaporating.


116 posted on 10/09/2004 6:48:36 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
It just feels like a cheap shot. Something that CBS would do.

Believe me, if CBS had something this DAMAGING and TRUE (rare for CBS), they would do it!

117 posted on 10/09/2004 6:56:28 PM PDT by evad (The existence of Israel would not pass JF'nK's Global Test)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
Whoo hoo! It makes my heart PROUD to see so many veterans STANDING UP TO KERRY AND NOT RELENTING!
118 posted on 10/09/2004 7:01:00 PM PDT by Chieftain (Support Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and EXPOSE Hanoi John Kerry's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Comment #119 Removed by Moderator

To: FairOpinion
A conservative U.S. broadcaster whose outlets reach one-quarter of the nation's TV viewers is airing a film that attacks John Kerry just before the election.

Not just 24% of the nation.

I see a lot of SWING STATES on their map.

Hot damn.

This is going to be good. And it's going to be big.

120 posted on 10/09/2004 7:35:43 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson