Posted on 10/09/2004 6:26:56 PM PDT by wagglebee
Tehran would welcome John Kerry's proposal to supply nuclear fuel, Hossein Musavian, the head Iran's Supreme National Security Council's foreign policy committee, announced today.
First outlined in a June speech, Kerry's plan to provide Iran with nuclear fuel in exchange for a pledge to use it for peaceful purposes only was unveiled to the American public during the first presidential debate.
"I think the United States should have offered the opportunity to provide the nuclear fuel, test them, see whether or not they were actually looking for it for peaceful purposes," Kerry said in a critique of the Bush administration's handling of Tehran's nuclear program, which the Iranians claim is only for civilian purposes.
"If they weren't willing to work a deal, then we could have put sanctions together," Kerry said of Tehran. "The president did nothing."
Initially, Iran rejected the idea, saying that reliance on foreign supplies would jeopardize its nuclear program.
Musavian told Reuters that Kerry's offer was also dismissed because officials could not tell if it was genuine or merely rhetoric in the U.S. presidential campaign. "If it is part of Kerry's election campaign ... we do not want to be part of it," he said. "Let the Americans play their game themselves."
But, now, the Iranians have changed their tune. Musavian says the Islamic Republic would welcome what Kerry running mate John Edwards has described as a "great bargain," and the proposal will be reviewed. Iran, however, should be allowed to pursue its "peaceful nuclear program," he made clear.
"Iran welcomes any constructive proposal from any American candidate," Musavian told Reuters. But "our legitimate right of pursuing peaceful nuclear technology should be considered," he said.
Musavian blames a history of "hostile" U.S. policies toward Iran, going back to the Reagan era, for his refusal to engage in direct talks on the nuclear issue with Washington. "It is because of 20 years of mistrust ... Up to now, Americans have not shown any sign of good will," he charged.
Edwards told the Washington Post in August that if Iran failed to take Kerry's "great bargain," it would be confirmation that the country is building nuclear weapons under the cover of developing a peaceful source of power.
WorldNetDaily has previously reported that Tehran is already engaged in an ambitious program to develop nuclear weapons to compliment its recently attained ballistic missile capabilities. According to the latest intelligence reports, Iran has decided at the highest levels of government to produce a bomb within the next four months.
Edwards assures that if Tehran accepted the proposal and subsequently cheated, Kerry could be counted upon to pull together a coalition of European allies to impose sanctions. "If we are engaging with Iranians in an effort to reach this great bargain and if, in fact, this is a bluff that they are trying to develop nuclear weapons capability, then we know that our European friends will stand with us," Edwards said.
yeah i bet they like it. they think were gonna repeat the clinton not-so-bright north korea debacle. Don't think so as long as GWB is around. Sorry johnny.
Talk about flip-flops. They rejected it last week.
Has there EVER been a better reason to vote for Bush!
I think Iran actually likes the idea of Kerry as President better. I'm sure on Nov. 3 they'll take a pass on the nuke fuel.
I don't think that Congress will let Kerry give nuclear fuel to the Iranians. No one is that dumb. Well, come to think of it, Clinton gave nuclear fuel to the North Koreans.
But I'm counting on the assumption that at least Congress learns from its mistakes, even if Kerry does not.
It is well established that Kerry is out of his mind...when it comes to being an American. He belongs in some third world country, pandering to every anti-American force he can...he would be at home then...and out of our hair!!!
God, where did the libs come up with this insane moron???
OH YEAH...the North Koreans told him how GREAT this plan works out...they told the Iranians about how the last DEMOCRAT president fell for their "peaceful uses" crap...dictaors, thugs, and terrorist know a FOOL when they see one....
What's the "great bargain" that the johns think we are going to get?
LOL! How gullible can these fools be? Hopefully, the voters are not as gullible as they are.
My guess is that McAwful and the Klintoons are thrilled to no end that Hitlery will be the only viable 'Rat candidate in four years.
"If we are engaging with Iranians in an effort to reach this great bargain and if, in fact, this is a bluff that they are trying to develop nuclear weapons capability, then we know that our European friends will stand with us," Edwards said.
Edwards appears to NOT know our "European friends" very well.
MAYBE THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN KERRY'S LAST QUESTION IN THE DEBATE LAST NIGHT.
I guess they figured out how well it worked for North Korea.
And if they cheat Edwards assures us Kerry would hit them with ---
SANCTIONS? That really stopped Kim, didn't it?
What's next up that old war hawk's sleve, the comfy chair?
Kerry's campaign would be a good SNL skit if it weren't for the fact that he still polls above 2%.
Shalom.
Suppose you were a European prince, and the US came to you and said, "We gave nuclear fuel to the Iranian Mullahs, and now they've developed an atomic bomb. We would like you to impose sanctions on them to convey the message that we don't like that."
Wouldn't your response be something like, "You did WHAT?"
Once again, "Here`s a machete Jason, if you try to kill me with it I`ll call the police"
What I don't understand is why is Bush not running a television ad that hits Kerry on this HARD?
Surprise, surprise!
EVERY enemy of America likes something about Joyhnhammed al Qerry.
Why do they need nuclear energy in the first place. They have all the oil they could possible ever need for energy. This just proves that libs don't use logic.
Not surprising.
Even the most left-wing Eurosocialists realize that the Iranians could develop missiles to strike Europe long before they could have the capacity to hit the US.
Tehran would welcome John Kerry's proposal to supply nuclear fuel,
How is this moron even close in the Polls? Kerry wants to give Nuke fuel to the Mullahs. He wants to help the NUMBER ONE STATE SPONSER OF TERRORISM develop nuclear weapons!!!
Between THAT and his statement on US development of Bunker Busters John Kerry demonstrates clearly that he has NOT developed Intellectually ONE BIT from the 1970s!
The Kerry Doctrine,
Talk LOUDLY and carry NO stick
Great bargain? Lets see, let's trade the security of the world for arming a hostile Islamic state on our list of state sponsors of terror and part of the axis of evil with nuclear fuel????? North Korea would not be a nuclear threat were it not for a similar policy of Clinton's about which Madeline said, "Well, the did not keep their word". What would these two imbiciles say when Iran lobs a nuke at Israel? "Don't blame us. They promised to be nice. How were we to know that they had their fingers crossed." Yeah, helluva bargain indeed!
Effin' Kerry is an effin' IDIOT! Iran FLOATS on a SEA of oil, the ONLY reason for that country to have nuke power is to produce nuke weapons! Of course the MSN is not laughing at Kerry as they would if they were doing their job right, this nonsense needs to be made into a GOP commercial so the American people can again see what a dangerous man the RATS have nominated!
Sounds like the negotiations are going according to Kerry's PLAN. He did tell us he had a PLAN, right?
5.56mm
MSM, not MSN;)
This should be in a commercial in every swing state in the country.
So Iran is run by flip-floppers like Kerry? They just said recently that they had no interest in said fuel - they had enough already....
Now they are saying they would accept???
Jerome Corsi (co-author with John O'Neill of Unfit for Command) is supposed to be giving a news conference the week of Oct. 11, in which he explains that Iranian businessmen who want to establish good economic relations with the Mullahs are top fund raisers for the Kerry campaign.
Well thats a fair trade.
As long as they promise us, I feel we can trust them. /sarcasm
you only have to cheat once with a nuclear bomb to win...how stupid can these 2 be?
FREE PASS !
The Major Media AGAIN gives this fool a free pass on this!
BS BS BS BS BS Holbrooke is also a freakin jerk who kerry will make sec of state! Holbrooke thinks the Clinton-albright method of non-proliferation is fabulous! He is a very dangerous man.........
Yeah, they decided they would make a deal with the "Great Satan" if it gave them the ability to kill more of us.
Thank you for the good laugh. After the last 10 days or so I was beginning to wonder if I could laugh.
This shows how naive and downright stupid Kedwards is...this is actually good news to get this out now...this takes away Lurch's ability to spin North Korea's nukes on President Bush. It puts it squarely back on BJ Clinton where it belongs. Lets see...Carter lets Cuba empty his jails and insane asylums here...BJ gives nuke material to North Korea...now Edwards and Kerry offer this to Iran...who's the idiots here?
I think they realized the mistake they made. The way I heard it was, if they refused the fuel, they were planning on making nuclear weapons. So they probably figured they'd better play along with the game and accept Kerry's offer so it wouldn't look like they were guilty of planned mischief.
Is that what Theresa said?
Shalom.
See this link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1234535/posts
(Dr. Corsi (Unfit for Command) To Reveal Democrats Connection to The Terror Masters of Iran!)
Umm...so...we give them fuel and they don't have to stop building their nukes? LOL!!! This is worse than the 'solution' for North Korea!
My assessment-
Iran thought G.W. lost the election Thursday night. With the way the MSM operates, can hardly blame them. Then they watch it last night and think Damn, G.W. could be here another four years. So they come up with a bunch of fluff that if accepted sanctions their continuance of a nuke program AND has us contribute to it! Kerry, being the fool he is, will think this proposal swell.
They don't have to be stupid at all.
We do.
Shalom.
Duuuh....
Perfect!
Axis of Evil for Kerry/Edwards!
This is moot. Now that Iran has orchestrated an attach on the citizen of Israel in the Sinai they have provided the pretext for Israel taking out their capability. Iran threatened Israel if they struck their facilities, but now they have rendered that threat irrelevant.
You have to admit, this would make sKerry's plan to neutralize the proliferation of rogue nukes from the former Soviet Union viable - by making those sources of nuclear material irrelevant.
If, God forbid, sKerry wins, I think Israel will take out Iran within a month.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.