Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Gun Debate tonight?
NRA ^ | 12 OCT 04 | dcbryan1

Posted on 10/12/2004 4:55:02 PM PDT by DCBryan1

I checked every Direct TV Channel and cannot find the "Great Gun Debate. Can anyone tell me what channel it is on tonight?

Thanks,

DCB


TOPICS: Free Republic; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; debate; gun; lapierre; un

1 posted on 10/12/2004 4:55:04 PM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
It's an ambush. Wayne LaPierre vs. Every anti-gun zealot in the EU. I think the debate is in London.

It's enemy territory: I think it's a felony if you allow your dog to bark at a cat in England.

2 posted on 10/12/2004 4:57:16 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

I think it is a pay-per-view event...


3 posted on 10/12/2004 4:57:35 PM PDT by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

I looked for it too, couldn't find it on Direct.


4 posted on 10/12/2004 4:59:15 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (Kerry: how can we trust him with our money, if Teresa won't trust him with hers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

http://www.thegundebate.com/

Turn on the audio


5 posted on 10/12/2004 5:00:26 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

on demand ppv.

says so right on the nra link.


6 posted on 10/12/2004 5:00:54 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

It is a pay per view event and is not available on DISH or Direct TV.


7 posted on 10/12/2004 5:00:58 PM PDT by Burf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Just like everything else Wayne and his money grubbing companions at the HQ of NRA do it'll cost you extra. A debate on gun control on PPV. Priceless.

Nice touch I say.


8 posted on 10/12/2004 5:03:29 PM PDT by Area51 (Diapers and Politicians need to be changed-For the same reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
"Gun-rights advocates assailed the United Nations Feb. 21 after it was revealed that security officers for Secretary-General Kofi Annan may be illegally carrying automatic weapons. Annan and other UN officials have called for worldwide gun control. “It’s the height of hypocrisy,” said John Velleco of Gun Owners of America. “The UN wants to regulate small arms worldwide, but apparently that doesn’t apply to them.” The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is investigating Annan’s guards for carrying German-made MP5 machine guns."
9 posted on 10/12/2004 5:06:08 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Area51

What, you expect them to run the worldwide fight against the UN gun-grabbers for free?

Money doesn't grow on trees, you know, and the gun industry is already on the ropes in this country thanks to frivolous lawsuits.

If people are willing to pay to see two powerful men beat each other senseless, why wouldn't gun activists pay to see Wayne LaPierre mop the floor with a bunch of Euroweenie gun-grabber pansies?


10 posted on 10/12/2004 5:06:24 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

UN gun debate? The authoritarian mentality of United Nations is what led The Founders to the writing and adoption of the 2nd Amendment. My answer to the UN is to invoke "Rule .308". SOB's.


11 posted on 10/12/2004 5:13:51 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
“The UN wants to regulate small arms worldwide, but apparently that doesn’t apply to them.”

No, they don't. There's your mistake. They don't want to regulate guns in Rwanda, or Sierra Leone, or mountain Pakistan. Too difficult. They just want to regulate guns in the fat, rich, stupid, tax-paying USA.

Low hanging fruit. Its a bit like the old joke about the guy looking for his lost keys under the street light. When asked where he lost them, he replied, "in the alley, but I'm looking here because that's where there's light."

12 posted on 10/12/2004 5:15:06 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

You're right. The UN is so fat, bloated and corrupt, that if it was a person, he couldn't regulate his bowels.


13 posted on 10/12/2004 5:17:56 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Area51

***Just like everything else Wayne and his money grubbing companions at the HQ of NRA do it'll cost you extra. ****

Say what you like but remember that the NRA is the lightning rod and catches all the anti-gun hell aimed at gun owners.

Who can remember when the NRA caught hell over the Robert Kennedy killling in 1968? They and they alone managed to save gun owners from the curse of registration and future confiscation. We may have lost a little in 1968 but we did not loose the whole pot!


14 posted on 10/12/2004 5:21:44 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (DEMS STILL LIE like dirty dam stinkin yellow dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Go to nra.org. Check out latest media and infomercials.


15 posted on 10/12/2004 5:28:11 PM PDT by carolinaoutdoorsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Or, just read this:

Transcript from Nightline 3-16-00, Gun debate betweeen Suzanna Hupp and Carolyn McCarthy

16 posted on 10/12/2004 5:46:40 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
The UN is so fat, bloated and corrupt, that if it was a person, he couldn't regulate his bowels.

I'd like to steal that and use it for a tagline, if you don't mind.

17 posted on 10/12/2004 9:32:55 PM PDT by Ken H (The UN is so fat, bloated and corrupt, that if it was a person, he couldn't regulate his bowels. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Good.


18 posted on 10/13/2004 9:54:50 AM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

I never used to think so, but now I believe "Rule 308" may actually be needed in my lifetime. Not sure yet if it will apply to internal or external enemies.


19 posted on 10/14/2004 6:30:58 AM PDT by Sender (It is not their patriotism, but their judgment, that is so sorely lacking. -Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sender; 45Auto
>> I never used to think so, but now I believe "Rule 308" may actually be needed in my lifetime. Not sure yet if it will apply to internal or external enemies. <<

The second UN troops set foot on SOVEREIGN US soil, Rule 308 will be invoked by many, many armed patriots. I pray it's not needed in our lifetimes, but sometimes the Lord's answer to a prayer is NO.

On internal vs external enemies....BOTH.
20 posted on 10/14/2004 12:16:21 PM PDT by appalachian_dweller (Threat Level: SEVERE {due to Ramadan} -- Basic list of survival gear @ my FR Homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

LIKE WRESTLEMANIA WITHOUT THE EXCITEMENT


21 posted on 10/14/2004 1:26:45 PM PDT by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece:If Marx is your hero, Kerry is your candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sender

Is "rule 308" like "rule 3006"?


22 posted on 10/14/2004 6:27:03 PM PDT by correctthought (Hippies, want to change the world, but all they ever do is smoke pot and smell bad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: correctthought

Yes but Rule 3006 has even farther reaching implications.


23 posted on 10/15/2004 6:26:51 AM PDT by Sender (It is not their patriotism, but their judgment, that is so sorely lacking. -Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Only if the dog is using hate barks.


24 posted on 10/15/2004 3:11:23 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Yes but Rule 3006 has even farther reaching implications.

And once implemented has a greater impact.

25 posted on 10/15/2004 3:13:31 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

Relax freepers..we hold the trump card...they will be wearing blue helmets when they try to enforce it.


26 posted on 10/15/2004 3:58:39 PM PDT by samadams2000 ("Did they get you to trade, your heroes for ghosts")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

We lost too much in 1968, I have been an on again off again member of the NRA because sometimes they appear weak and spineless at least Wayne is not as spineless as those who said in 1968 "If we compromise a little now the antigunners will go away"


27 posted on 11/29/2004 12:19:02 PM PST by Falcon76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson