Skip to comments."Charitable" Foundations: ATMs for the Left
Posted on 10/15/2004 8:03:01 PM PDT by 2ThumbsUp
"Charitable" Foundations: ATMs for the Left "Charitable" Foundations: ATMs for the Left By Ben Johnson FrontPageMagazine.com | March 2, 2004
One of the unlamented developments of this election year is the Democratic Partys retreat to the Left. Although the media claim the party's voters have learned their lesson by settling for the electable John F. Kerry, a cursory examination of the Democrats shows they remain animated by anti-Bush furor. The party rank-and-file may have decided they prefer the sing-song cadences of John Kerry or the charming drawl of John Edwards to the red-faced shrieks of Howard Dean, but the message spread by the party faithful will remain the same: George W. Bush is a liar, a betrayer, a war criminal and a Nazi.
What explains the Lefts pathological animosity toward a president who has shielded the American homeland from jihad for more than two years and liberated two nations from the hands of hostile fanatics? In part, it is due to the rising importance of activist groups like MoveOn.org and take-to-the-streets peaceniks like United for Peace and Justice. These organizations, in turn, are financed by the seemingly endless reserves of the nations non-profit charitable foundations, which long ago abandoned their commitment to philanthropy in favor of political activism. These separate entities environmentalists, 60s radicals, union organizers, Islamists and abortion advocates repeatedly converge in dizzying combinations. Inevitably, the large tax-exempt foundations fund the same radical personalities and groups. Their staff is invariably composed of the same far-Left activists (and a curiously high number of Clinton administration appointees). Ultimately, these inter-related organizations form one well-heeled, left-wing Brain Trust with literally billions of dollars at their disposal. These foundations are positioned to permanently shift our nations political dialogue to the Left through their grant-making power.
George Soros and the Open Society Institute
Perhaps the most openly political of these philanthropic poseurs is currency speculator George Soros, whose Open Society Institutes (OSI) assets totaled more than $175 million in 2001. Soros has said defeating George W. Bush is the focus of my life and has compared the sitting president to the Nazis occupiers of his native Hungary. To bring about regime change in Washington, Soros has pledged $10 million of his own money to the newly formed Democratic voter turnout group, Americans Coming Together (ACT) and vowed to raise a total of $95 million.
ACT is the most prominent of a new generation of leftist groups: the 527s. These organizations are so-named because of their IRS status, which allows them wider latitude to receive and spend soft money than traditional political parties enjoy. ACT formally seeks to boost minority voter turnout in17 battleground states vital to the Democratic Party. A look at the Executive Committee of ACT reveals a leftist organization composed of the usual suspects:
ACT president Ellen Malcolm is also founder of the fringe abortion advocacy group EMILYs List; CEO Steve Rosenthal was political director of the AFL-CIO from 1996-2002; Minyon Moore is a former assistant and Director of White House Political Affairs for President Clinton; Carl Pope is executive director of the Sierra Club; Andy Stern is president of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), one of two major unions to endorse Howard Dean before the Iowa caucuses; and Cecile Richards is a former deputy chief to House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, D-CA. Cecile is the daughter of former Texas Governor Ann Richards, who lost her governorship to George W. Bush. The younger Richards is also president of America Votes, another Democratic 527 that has already collected $250 million.
Although not ona board member, former SEIU political director Gina Glantz is considered a prime mover within ACT. The clear purpose of ACT is to run issue advocacy ads smearing President Bush in the hopes of electing a Democrat.
Political strategist Dick Morris has stated the 527s have another purpose as well: they act as a party-in-exile for the Clintons. In a FrontPage Magazine column, Morris suggested the Clintons were funneling money into these start-ups, which could provide campaign support to favored candidates (e.g., Hillary in 2008), in the event they lose the formal party machinery. (Current DNC Chairman Terry MacAuliffe was handpicked by Bill Clinton and has demonstrated impeccable loyalty.) This may explain the large numbers of Clinton functionaries active in 527s. Minyon Moore is on the Executive Committee of ACT. Moore is Clintons former political director and assistant, as well an ex-DNC officer. ACT President Ellen Malcolm joined with Clinton aide Harold Ickes to form the Media Fund, another 527 organization that seeks to purchase issue advocacy ads attacking President Bush near election-time.
The organization most clearly tied to the Clintons, however, is the Center for American Progress, headed by former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta. CAP is a think tank meant to rival the Heritage Foundation. Like Heritage, CAP intends to lay the ideological basis for left-wing legislation, as well as provide a philosophical opposition to Bush administration proposals. George Soros has set aside $3 million for the Center.
Soros deep pockets also financed the feminist movement, dispersing money to the National Organization for Women, the Feminist Majority, Planned Parenthood and NARAL. Soros kind support also established the Million Mom March, getting the anti-gun rally off the ground in 2000.
These organizations are intended to serve partisan functions: to elect or intellectually bolster Democrats, and although these groups are to the Left, they fall within the mainstream of the political discussion. However, much of Soros money goes to organizations on the wrong side of the War on Terror. Soros has given multiple millions of dollars to the ACLU over the years. Likewise, the Ford Foundation gave the ACLU more than $335,000 last year alone. The ACLUs leftist orientation has been well known since 1988, when Michael Dukakis lost the election in part because of their stance on capital punishment and the Pledge of Allegiance. But the ACLU has more important flags to burn; in recent years, the ACLU has lied about the effects of the Patriot Act, rallied to defend Maher Mike Hawash (who has since pleaded guilty to providing support for the Taliban), protested the Justice Departments arrest of illegal immigrants from Iraq on the eve of war, falsely accused John Ashcroft of abusing his authority (without evidence, naturally) and protested for the inhumane treatment of terrorist fundraiser and professor Sami al-Arian (on the grounds that he had an inalienable right to change his underwear more than once a week). The Ford Foundation also got in on the act, giving the ACLU endowment fund $7 million in 1999 alone.
Despite its deep hostility to the War on Terrorism, many classify the ACLU as a mainstream liberal organization. Be that as it may; George Soros funding is hardly reserved to the mainstream. OSI also funded the fantasies of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee Research Institute. This is the same group that falsely accused the Justice Department of inhumane treatment of a Muslim prisoner, claiming they forcibly extracted numerous teeth, brutalized him and forced him to eat pork all later proven to be lies. ADC Communications Director Hussein Ibish has defended Palestinian suicide bombers (as long as they dont target civilians; how big of you, Hussein!), praised Hamas for running hospitals and schools and orphanages, defended Sami al-Arian and praised Mao Tse-tung.
The Open Society Institute also supports radical black Muslims, who idolize gangsters waging a bloody war against the nations police. In 2001, OSI gave $65,000 to the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement. This group is a fitting counterpart to Aryan Nations, which seeks an All White Pacific Northwest; the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement campaigns to free the land! specifically, the Southeastern United States, from South Carolina to Louisiana, on which they would establish an all-black homeland. Moreover, this new racist entity would be communist, as the Movement seeks to (t)o place the major means of production and trade in the trust of the state. In this, they have gotten tips from the experts; Speakers Bureau member Ina Solomon represented the organization internationally during her five-month residency in Cuba.
Most disturbing, the Malcolm X Grassroots Movements website lionizes a group of political prisoners, all of whom were convicted of killing policemen. Sundiata Acoli, Robert Seth Hayes, Jalil Muntaquin, Herman Bell and Russell Maroon Shoats were all radical black revolutionaries, serving with the Black Panthers and/or Black Liberation Army. Moreover, the website repeatedly excuses their crimes. For instance, of Shoats, the website writes: In 1970, along with 5 others, Maroon was accused of attacking a police station, which resulted in an officer being killed. This attack was said to have been carried out in response to the rampant police brutality in the Black community. Of Teddy Jah Heath, a political prisoner who died for the cause (in prison, of natural causes), the website records: Teddy Jah Heath, along with former (Black) Panther 21 defendant Baba Odinga, was arrested and charged with the politically motivated kidnapping of an organized crime figure from Westchester County. The kidnapping ended peacefully and without injury to anyone. How reassuring.
Elsewhere, the Movement website deems the Lefts favorite whitey-murderer, Mumia Abu-Jamal, a political prisoner. This is not the only pro-Mumia group Soros has funded. His foundations gave generously to the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund (NAACP-LDEF), which has filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Mumia Abu-Jamal. LDEF leaders frequently speak at Free Mumia rallies. The Ford Foundation gave the NAACP-LDEF half-a-million dollars in 2002.
Not content to merely advocate for the release of violent offenders, Soros foundations have also helped expand the right to vote . . . to felons. LDEF has also encouraged Floridas convicted felons to vote in 2000, although that violates state law. As Thomas Ryan noted on yesterdays FrontPage Magazine, the OSI is also a major contributor to The Sentencing Project, a group that advocates voting rights for felons; much of this support came after a study Soros funded revealed Democrats would receive 70 percent of the felon vote. The Ford and MacArthur Foundations have also funded The Sentencing Project.
In keeping with his tendency to fund racist groups that want to ethnically cleanse portions of the United States, Soros has also funded the racist National Council of La Raza and Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF). Both groups seek to open Americas borders and have visions of reclaiming Aztlan (the American Southwest, stolen from Mexico by the Yanquis). MALDEF is in essence a Ford Foundation creation, with Ford radicalizing the once-noble organization with a $2.2 million grant in 1968.
Money from Soros foundations also goes to the peace movement. In 1999, OSI gave $100,000 to the comically misnamed People for the American Way (PAW), an organization dedicated to removing religion from public life. (The Ford Foundation also gave PAW $150,000 from 2000-1.) PAW also helped create a communist-led peace movement to oppose the Bush administration. International ANSWER had sponsored the major peace rallies, but when its radical nature became known, it was PAW that looked for a more acceptable organization to sponsor these enormous demonstrations. PAW created United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ) and chose as its mainstream leader Leslie Cagan, who was a member of the Communist Party after the fall of the Berlin Wall. She describes Castros Cuba as the ideal state.
Cagans fellow communists at the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) also enjoy George Soros largesse. Founded as a Communist Party defense agency, the NLG history is replete with pro-Communist agitation. In 1977, Guild President William Goodman warned his Maoist members, We will not be able to organize people into the Guild, and in fact we will lose much of our membership, if we promote slogans of opposing the Soviet Union and opposing the Communist Party. The keynote speaker at NLGs 2003 national convention, Lynne Stewart, praised Ho Chi Minh, Mao Tse-tung, Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. Soros gave the NLG $50,000 in 2000.
The Center for the Study of Constitutional Rights (CCR) is another legal organization with close ties to communist politics and terrorism. The CCR has opposed our every effort to defend ourselves in the War on Terror, moaning that America would not admit any immigrant with a position of prominence within any country to endorse or espouse terrorist activity. Soros has given the CCR more than $120,000 over the last six years. In this, he trails the Ford Foundation, which gave CCR more than $150,000 last year alone.
The now-defunct Soros Documentary Fund gave Medea Benjamin money to produce Indonesia: Islands on Fire. Benjamin is best known as head of Global Exchange, an organization that takes credulous leftists on propaganda tours highlighting the successes of socialist nations and the horrors of American foreign policy. Benjamin played a leading role in the violent 1999 World Trade Organization protests in Seattle, and in the 2001 G-8 protests in Genoa, Italy, which also ended in violence. Most recently, she teamed up with Leslie Cagan to form International Occupation Watch, whose professed goal was to get U.S. GIs stationed in Iraq to declare themselves conscientious objectors and get them sent home. This, wrote Benjamin in The Nation last April, would cause the war effort to collapse and force us to beat a hasty retreat from other terrorist hotspots. In the same piece, Benjamin endorsed preemptively sending human shields to hot spots like North Korea and Iran. Like Cagan, Benjamin has described Marxist Cuba as heaven and has found her way onto the foundations gravy train.
These are but a few of the radical organizations Soros has funded. In fact, it is impossible to know exactly how many other radicals are receiving Soros money. Soros gave more than $13 million to the Tides Foundation/Center between 1997 and 2003. (In this, he is in good company; Sen. John Kerrys wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, has contributed more than $4 million to Tides over the years.) The Tides Foundation acts as a middle-man between wealthy leftists and far-Left advocacy groups, with which the wealthy leftists do not wish to be associated. Among Tides beneficiaries are the National Lawyers Guild, the Center for Constitutional Rights, CAIR, United for Peace and Justice, the Institute for Global Communications and a wide assortment of groups on the extreme margins of the political debate.
Vile Leftists: The Personal Touch
These extremist organizations form a coalition most would find unsavory, but shady personal alliances are nothing new to Soros. His right-hand man is the former director of the ACLUs Washington, D.C., office: Morton Halperin. As Rep. Phil Crane, R-IL, noted in the Congressional Record, Halperin has called for dissolving the CIA covert career service, tagged the CIA as `the subverter of everybody else's freedom' and declared it `an open question' whether the CIA and other U.S. intelligence services would turn to assassinating American citizens. Halperin, a lifelong leftist agitator, testified for Daniel Ellsberg and served as a character witness for Philip Agee. Agee famously printed the names of more than 700 of his CIA colleagues before fleeing to the workers paradise of Cuba. For his close association with a known traitor, Bill Clinton appointed Halperin assistant to Defense Secretary Les Aspin in 1993. Another longtime Soros associate, Peter Lewis of Progressive Insurance, has been described as a functioning pothead. Like Soros, he is a staunch advocate of drug legalization, and like Soros, he has also earmarked a cool $10 million in personal funds to defeat President Bush in November. Quota Queen Lani Guinier, Clinton nominee for Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, sits on OSIs Board of Trustees. So does ubiquitous PBS presence Bill Moyers.
Bill Moyers and the Schumann Foundation
Bill Moyers has learned well from his comrade Soros. In addition to sitting on the board of Soros Open Society Institute, Moyers is president of the Florence and John Schumann Foundation, from which position he funds both the respectable and the radical Left.
Just as Soros millions created Americans Coming Together from nothing, Moyers steered Schumann Foundation money into an obscure journal known as The American Prospect. Once a tiny bimonthly academic journal, Moyers turned loose the foundations spigots and flooded TAP with pledges of nearly $11 million. It was a $5.5 million grant in 1999 that transformed TAP from an academic journal to a biweekly newsstand publication meant to rival National Review. The Ford Foundation similarly gave TAP a $600,000 grant. Although Schumann money conferred respectability upon this publication, TAP maintains connections to the radical Left. The Prospects Editor-at-Large, Harold Meyerson, is a Vice-Chair of the Democratic Socialists of America; DSA chairs include Barbara Ehrenreich, Cornel West, Gloria Steinem and Delores Huerta. TAP founders include Robert Kuttner and diminutive Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich.
Similar support has gone to leftist website TomPaine.com.
The Schumann Foundation gave $332,000 to Ralph Nader groups Public Citizen Foundation and U.S. PIRG from 1995-2000. The Ford Foundation gave $450,000 to Public Citizen in 2000; the Rockefeller Brothers Foundation gave the Naderites $100,000.
Schumann also gave $52,000 to Citizen Action, an organization later mired in controversy over supporting Ron Carey in the 1996 Teamsters presidential election. (Edward Kelly, former head of the Massachusetts chapter, recalled Citizen Actions metamorphosis from grassroots organization to partisan pressure group: Before the Teamsters scandal, there were problems. Basically, I saw national go from a nonpartisan, grass-roots organization to a partisan one tied to the Democratic Party. The scandal did not deter the Ford Foundation, which gave Citizen Action $150,000 in 1997.
Schumann money funded the Institute for Public Accuracy, headed by leftist Norman Solomon. The IPA coordinated Sean Penns first trip to Baghdad, before the war; Medea Benjamin coordinated Penns return trip late last year.
The Florence Fund (part of the Schumann Foundation, headed by Bill Moyers son, John) contributed to a full-page New York Times ad to publicize the Win Without War coalition. Coincidentally, Moyers later interviewed two Win Without War officials on his PBS program, NOW with Bill Moyers. At no time did Moyers disclose his financial ties to his guests.
The MacArthur Foundation
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation is another name immediately familiar to anyone who has watched PBS for more than five minutes. The Chicago-based charity, with $4 billion in assets, has underwritten all forms of public broadcasting, but their $170 million annual grants go to less benign faces than Big Birds. PBS is not the only not-for-profit television MacArthur funds; it is also listed as a contributor to radical leftist propaganda outlet Link TV. The MacArthur, Surdna and Rockefeller Brothers Foundations were among the many non-profits Link TV acknowledged on the air during last weekends pledge drive.
The MacArthur Foundation is also among the numerous philanthropic organizations to fund leftist agitator Medea Benjamin. MacArthur gave Global Exchange more than $400,000 in 1999-2000 alone. Benjamin also received the MacArthur Foundations Writers Fellowship.
Benjamin is a fierce partisan of Marxist Cuba. Other MacArthur grants have explicitly supported Castros gulag archipelago. MacArthur gave a $347,000 grant to the prestigious Council on Foreign Relations, a portion (of which) supports the Councils Cuba Program, which, in the grants words, seeks to broaden the national debate on normalizing relations between the United States and Cuba. MacArthur also gave $30,000 to the Cuban Committee for Democracy, which wants to counteract conservative Cuban-Americans (supporting) an agenda that favors the isolation and punishment of the Cuban people because of their government.
The Institute for Policy Studies similarly has a history of colluding with Communist governments. Phyllis Bennis of IPS is on the board of International Occupation Watch, along with Medea Benjamin and Leslie Cagan. She was also an outspoken opponent of the liberation of Iraq. MacArthur gave IPS $233,000 in 2001 alone.
On the serious policy front, MacArthur has charitably given money to undermine the presidents defense and foreign policy agenda. MacArthur awarded the Aspen Institute $841,000 to study global interdependence. The Aspen Institutes Global Interdependence Initiative website says it works to better inform, and to more effectively motivate, American support for forms of U.S. international engagement that are appropriate to an interdependent world. Translation: We oppose the presidents unilateral (that is, effective) foreign policy. This grant generated more scholarly opposition to President Bush.
Since 9/11 exposed how vulnerable the nation is to terrorist attack, Bush has renewed the nations interest in a Missile Defense system. MacArthur has funded the opposition, giving more than $300,000 to the left-leaning Center for Defense Information, a longtime opponent of Missile Defense.
The Tip of the Iceberg
These grants, sadly, only touch upon the deep, sustained pattern of leftist political activism funded by these enormous, tax-exempt foundations. And these three foundations OSI, Schumann and MacArthur are only a selective representation of the enormous grant-making power the Left has accrued by capturing the leadership of the nations largest foundations. FrontPage Magazine has documented the activities of the multi-billion dollar Ford Foundation in a series of articles; Ford has, indeed, created entire academic disciplines on our nations campuses. Carnegie and others follow Fords lead. Together, these grants have the ability to realign our national political discourse, subsidizing and mainstreaming the rhetoric of the far-Left. Conservatives have no similar funding sources. Conservative philanthropists typically leave their money to churches, colleges and community improvement projects; leftists leave all their funds to fellow activists. This fundamental difference may one day have a transforming effect upon this nation.
This author is particularly indebted to the invaluable work of Mike Bauer, who contributed much of the raw data about the Open Society Institute's grant figures.
On the same subject, here is one more site worth looking at
ActivistCash.com | Tides Foundation & Tides Center
The enemy defined - ping
Since I was a newby, I was full of questions and other stuff and I asked the Manager how come I only got $4 of the 5 and he explained that the $1 always went directly to John MacArthur. That was how he never lost touch with what his entire field force was doing each day!
He and W. Clement Stone were quite the tycoons, along with many other successful insurance company founders around the turn of the century, a century ago. The would absolutely HATE what has been done with their fortunes these days!!!
I think they were all buried under Mt. St. Helens and are spinning in their graves so fast that it's making magma!!!
Whatever happened to the "idle rich"?
They became the "elite reich", or so it would appear.
I'm not surprised at most of these foundations supporting extremism, especially the Ford Foundation.
I wonder how long the Malcolm X group has been active? The original Malcolm X (born Malcolm Little in Nebraska) joined the mass immigration of Blacks into the cities, moving to Harlem. While serving prison time, he came under the influence of the Nation of Islam (Black Muslims) which is when he "renounced his slave name" and became Malcolm X.
After a pilgrimage to Mecca, he returned to the USA and formed the Organization for Afro-American Unity (a less radical group). In 1965, two Black Muslims were arrested for his murder after he was found dead in a Mosque.
A friend of mine emailed the webmaster of http://www.aztlan.net basically telling them they were misinformed, hateful, and in conflict with many of their own politics. The following is part of the response my friend got back:
"The ACLU is controlled by Jews out of New York City.
It is the Jews that promote their agenda and many other
leftists follow. They are the ones behind pushing the
sodomite agenda and behind many anti-Christian actions
like removing the cross from the LA county seal.
The Jews play all sides of issues. That is why you see
some rabbis and the Jew Daniel Prager opposing the
removal of the cross from the LA county seal. This is in
order to confuse the Goyim and not present a monolithic
front which will betray what they do behind the scenes
to manipulate the host countries they prey on. They
know that if Gentiles start finding out about their machinations
that they would face the dangers they have experienced
throughout history. They have been expelled continuously
>from country after country since 200 AD.
Islam will be the undoing of the great USA empire if the
Necons(Zionists) continue to dictate USA foreign policy.
New York city was blasted on 911 because it is a center
of power for USA Jewry. Perhaps west LA or Encino may
become a future target for Islam, but we are informing
Muslims so that they will try to avoid hitting our communities."
STRANGE BEDFELLOWS amongst these antiwar/commie groups!
FYI...a revealing thread on the funding of the radical antiwar groups!
Also see my post #7 about the rabidly anti-Jewish group that is receiving funding. It's amazing that I've seen antiwar leftists using their website articles that bash Bush while ignoring their other hateful views.
In the most recent articles at their website, they were digging into the "Jewish roots" of Kerry and also posting the draft scare.
Have you seen the ad sponsored by the Tides Foundation featuring Jennifer Anniston shilling for votes? Representing single women, of all things. Imagine that. The Pitts are indeed the pits. Liberal pits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.