Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DRUDGE REPORT: Pat Buchanan to Endorse Bush Tomorrow
Drudge Report Radio | October 17, 2004 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 10/17/2004 7:15:03 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

Matt Drudge said he heard from the "grapevine" that Pat Buchanan will endorse Bush tomorrow.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antiwarright; buchanan; bush; drudge; endorsement; gwb2004; kerry; patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2004 7:15:03 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
PAT BUCHANAN, KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT! OR, IF YOU HAVE TO ENDORSE SOMEONE, ENDORSE JOHN KERRY!!

2 posted on 10/17/2004 7:16:07 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

The only people who wll care about this are the Buchananites. Pat's endorsement will mean a few more votes for Bush; but fewer than Nader will cost Kerry. Combined, it means maybe a 1 or two points spead for Bush in States where Nader is on the ballot.


3 posted on 10/17/2004 7:19:57 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

note to Pat: put a sock in it.


4 posted on 10/17/2004 7:22:28 PM PDT by wingnutx (tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Did Patty B consult our own 'Willie Green' before he made this endorsement?


5 posted on 10/17/2004 7:23:47 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Hey guys, since Pat is endorsing the president you may now throw out your concerns over voter fraud!! This IS the october surprise.
Bush will carry 50 states because of Buchanan's endorsement!!!!!!!!












;)


6 posted on 10/17/2004 7:28:13 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (These Commies are ruining our country...........WAKE UP AMERICA BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

In a related story, Hell freezes over. Film at 11.


7 posted on 10/17/2004 7:28:28 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It's sad to see such animosity toward a guy who stated in the early 1990s that if we didn't get our borders under control, we were going to be exposed to terrible acts of terrorism, negative pressures on the ability to elect conservatives and ever increasing balkinization of the nation as well as incredible negative impacts on education, healthcare, social services, local communities and multiple forms of national infrastructure.

Yep, boy was he sure wrong. NOT!

Duh!


8 posted on 10/17/2004 7:28:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
CORRECT - KEEP YOUR ENDORSEMENT TO YOURSELF PAT!!!!!
9 posted on 10/17/2004 7:46:30 PM PDT by ImpBill (America ... Where are you now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

The animosity is not toward conservative policies. It isn't accurate to tie support of Pat to support of conservatism.

The main discontent with Pat surrounds his statements about Isreal, the Middle East, as well as personal views of his character.

There are times I enjoy listening to Pat. He's a bright man, articulate. His interviews during the swiftvet height were the sharpest on TV, imo. Then there are periods when I wish to have no association with him. That desire has never been because I reject conservative principles.


10 posted on 10/17/2004 7:51:11 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: teletech

Did Patty B consult our own 'Willie Green' before he made this endorsement?



No it was ARATOR .......


11 posted on 10/17/2004 7:54:48 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Well he does have a constituency, so I guess it is ok. Bush isn't compromising, he is. Despite hating the Likud Party, Sharon, neocons and free trade he is endorsing Bush because he knows Kerry is a mortal danger to the Republic.


12 posted on 10/17/2004 7:55:01 PM PDT by AmarilloMorning
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

He must have been paid-off by a bunch of Florida Demoncrats.


13 posted on 10/17/2004 7:58:12 PM PDT by SmithL (Vietnam-era Vet: Still fighting Hillary's half-vast left-wing conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
No it was ARATOR .......

My apologies to Willie Green.

14 posted on 10/17/2004 7:58:29 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: deport
No it was ARATOR .......
Oh man ... that brings back not-so-pleasant memories!
15 posted on 10/17/2004 7:58:43 PM PDT by Quicksilver (Yeah, but does it pass the "global test"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver

RATOR was capable of stirring the pot real well. I think he's even given up on Pattie.....


16 posted on 10/17/2004 8:02:00 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

LOL, I was thinking the same thing, on reading the headline.


17 posted on 10/17/2004 8:02:39 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

I think your comments are reasoned. In that context I'll respond that although I do think Pat's policies are misguided at times, I do not see him as I see democrats. They seek to take down our system by any means possible.

I don't think Pat wishes to do that. While I disagree stridently with his middle-east views, I do think he speaks reasoned logic on other issues.

It was never my intent to have his complete platform adopted. It would have been fine with me if nothing more than his demands that our nation's security be considered above political correctness and the citizens of a foreign nation, had been implemented.

I voted for him in 2000. As such I realized the congress would moderate his desires. Many of his advisors would have been republican.

For all his talk about avoiding incumberances in the middle-east, I don't see how he could have avoided military action there post 09/11.

Had our leaders implemented reasoned border control policies, we would have avoided 09/11. There was no excuse for what took place.

We still don't have adequate border control and all folks can think to say about Pat, is that he inconsequential.

Is homeland security inconsequential? Nope.

Thanks for the comments.


18 posted on 10/17/2004 8:02:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I believe the ironic response waould be "NO PAT NO!"


19 posted on 10/17/2004 8:05:29 PM PDT by glennherman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: glennherman

That's okay Glenn. Post 09/11, when our borders were ignored, I realized there would be folks who would dismiss any call to get them under control. Expecting those same folks to understand the value of Buchanan's message on that point, was out of the question.

Take care.


D1


20 posted on 10/17/2004 8:11:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson