Kerry: I Wouldn't Respond to Nuclear Attack

Newsmax ^ | August 13, 2004 | Carl Limbacher

[dubyain04jebin08and12]

>>>> One would think this statement would have been addressed by the fair and balanced (NOT!!) debate moderators.

If you look at the executive order and the role of a state's lieutenant governor, the only thing sensationalistic about this issue is the Newsmax headline. There are WAY better avenues of attack.

[TankerKC]

I'm having troble finding the "quote" from the title in the text of the article. Can you help me out?

[VRWCer]

Don't know that there actually is a quote worded quite that way, I believe that Newsmax feels that the sentiment is implied in the act of signing this order, hence the title. (Newsmax titles are often like that. They succeed in getting our attention though!)

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

I agree about better avenues of attack. But this is a part of his record which reveals something abiut his mindset on this issue.

It is not a major attack issue, but it is something more people need to hear him address. National Security is THE issue. How would he respond if Krazy North Korean tries to launch an attack?

[dubyain04jebin08and12]

>>> It is not a major attack issue, but it is something more people need to hear him address. National Security is THE issue. How would he respond if Krazy North Korean tries to launch an attack?

Don't think I am saying that I think he is strong on security. I just mean that there are better ways to show that he is weak on security than by pointing to some executive order he signed in a nonmilitary position. No lieutenant governor, no matter how hawkish or conservative, can offer much response to a military attack.

This is not the best we can do to show that Kerry is weak on military issues, and by citing to crap like this to "prove" that point we only undermine the truth.

[SERKIT]

This simply gives a little extra insight into how messed up Kerry's mind is.

I like the Bush doctrine. If attacked by a WMD, we reserve the right to use anything in our arsenal as a response. In otherwords, we could use any in-kind response. I LIKE IT!

[TankerKC]

They succeed in getting our attention though!

This is true of most exaggerations (and those that tell them).

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

I think we are of the same mindset.

Sometimes the correct wording doesn't transfer from brain to screen. Especially when I am tired.

[devolve]

SLICE & DICE       CUT & RUN  
PRE-EMPTOR?    RESPONDER?

DO YOU PAY ONLY 12½% FED INCOME TAXES?

                   

[TankerKC]

Ping to Newsmax "creative" titles.

Just letting you know that my opinion of NewsMax is not improving.