To: conservativepoet
"Compared to the 2000 election, Bush is in a much better situation including the country's driving issue of the campaign: terroism. Bush didn't have that kind of issue back then." True, but Bush also didn't have the huge negatives he has this time. It wouldn't take much to drive Bush's negatives up enough to cause him to lose the election. That's what the RATs and the MSM are trying to do. It's their best shot at the WH in 2004.
15 posted on
10/18/2004 7:42:37 PM PDT by
CatOwner
To: CatOwner
I disagree. When the story suddenly came out about Bush's ancient DUI, that caused a serious withdrawal from 4 million evangelicals. This time that will not happen because we've had four years of Bush, we know him.
To: CatOwner
True, but Bush also didn't have the huge negatives he has this time. It wouldn't take much to drive Bush's negatives up enough to cause him to lose the election. That's what the RATs and the MSM are trying to do. It's their best shot at the WH in 2004. Kerry has very high negatives himself, very difficult for a challenger.
29 posted on
10/19/2004 1:42:57 AM PDT by
gop_gene
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson