Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor (Schwarzenegger) bucks Legislature and GOP in backing new (open) primary system
Monterey Herald ^ | Oct. 18, 2004 | MICHAEL R. BLOOD

Posted on 10/18/2004 10:06:01 PM PDT by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: FairOpinion

21 posted on 10/19/2004 8:59:09 AM PDT by KantianBurke (Am back but just for a short while)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

We warned you about Arnold...all of you who blindly supported this guy...

Raise your hand if you want the constitution ammended to let this idiot run for President...I dare you...

Proud to have voted for Tom McClintock


22 posted on 10/19/2004 9:02:27 AM PDT by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antaresequity

23 posted on 10/19/2004 9:08:54 AM PDT by KantianBurke (Am back but just for a short while)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

----Can someone explain to me what's the problem with his idea?----

The problem is that it would transport Louisiana's political system over to California. And if THAT doesn't scare the living daylights out of Californians, then they have no idea what they're in for.

The Democrats love the open-primary system, because it gives them the chance to shut Republicans out of elections altogether. That was the whole idea when Dem governor Edwin Edwards instituted it in La., when the GOP started showing signs of life here in the '70s. It hasn't worked out for them nearly as often as they'd like, but it's still a big danger for Republicans, in more ways than one. It was the open-primary system that allowed David Duke to become the GOP runoff candidate for governor in '91, whereas his political career would rightfully have been DOA in every single other state in the country.

I don't know what the proposal is in California, but Louisiana election laws ALSO require voters to cast a vote in EVERY SINGLE RACE -- or have their ENTIRE ballot thrown out. And when it gets down to run-off elections, that can present one hell of a horrible choice for La. Republicans. For example: There is a very good chance that two Democrats will end up in the run-off positions in my congressional district, shutting the Republicans out of the race. They (the Dem candidates) are both absolute slimebags. However, in that event, I will be FORCED to vote for one or the other in December, in order to also cast a valid ballot for David Vitter for Senate. I'm not aware of any other state that has this form of compulsory voting -- yet.

If Californians know what's good for them, they will bust ass to STOP THIS IDEA NOW.

-Dan

(P.S. McClintock didn't have a chance in hell.)

24 posted on 10/19/2004 12:36:40 PM PDT by Flux Capacitor ("AMERICA-A-A-A!!! F*** YEAH!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

NO on 62!

dagnabit

25 posted on 10/19/2004 12:50:29 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (The bullets inside are very hot. Why do I feel so cold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

...and while we're at it, Governor...
NO on 71!
26 posted on 10/19/2004 12:52:00 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (The bullets inside are very hot. Why do I feel so cold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson