[Paul C. Jesup]

The fundamental issue is judicial tyranny. Without that this marrige amendment would not even be an issue.

If the fundamental issue is judicial tyranny than you are attacking a symtom, homosexuality, and not the problem, which is judicial tyranny.

[briant]

I'm not attacking anything. I don't think they should have an amendment to the constitution to punish judicial tyranny. But that's the reaction and, of course, it wont get through because a lot of conservatives see the error in changing the constitution to fight this problem.

[nothingnew]

If the fundamental issue is judicial tyranny than you are attacking a symtom, homosexuality, and not the problem, which is judicial tyranny.

Ya gotta start somewhere, dont'cha?

I have updated my FMCDH (From My Cold Dead Hands) sign-off with the addition of (BITS).....Blood In The Streets, which I foresee coming soon, due to the enormous increase of the Marxist progressive movement being shoved down the throat of this failing REPUBLIC through the Judicial tyranny of fiat law, the passing of unconstitutional laws by the Legislative and Executive branches of our government and the enormous tax burden placed upon the average American to support unconstitutional programs put forth by Marxist ideology.

FMCDH(BITS)