Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry leads big in new reg. - Bush barely leads in early voting
Zogby ^

Posted on 10/20/2004 7:20:48 AM PDT by dfdemar

Per Zogby:

“It's still neck and neck, folks, and targeting is intense. With Bush and Kerry now tied among seniors, small wonder that Kerry is pushing hard on social security. Recall that in 2000 when Gore faced the same dilemma, he closed out the race winning seniors pressing the social security button. Bush’s lead among armed forces’ families is strong—maybe Sinclair hears the call to reinforce. Similarly, Kerry’s growing young voter appeal can only be helped by the ‘draft.’ Two new items to note: Among newly registered voters Kerry leads 52% to 38%; among those who have already voted, Bush leads 50% to 48%. These two groups bear watching.”

https://interactive.zogby.com/clickon/products.dbm (subscription)

(Excerpt) Read more at interactive.zogby.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 123whodoweappreciate; bush; bushamanoffaith; bushistheman; bushwinsbylandslide; commiekerry; earlyvote; ilovepresbush; kerrylied; kerrysucks; liberalgoons; liberalliars; liberalloons; poll; ratslosers; registration; vote; votebush2004; votegwb2004; willnotstealelection; zogby; zogbyshillforrats; zogbysucks
How is Zogby getting these numbers?
1 posted on 10/20/2004 7:20:49 AM PDT by dfdemar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

Interesting.


2 posted on 10/20/2004 7:21:47 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

Yes, I didn't think early voting was actually counted and released til Nov 2


3 posted on 10/20/2004 7:22:28 AM PDT by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

How the hell would he know?


4 posted on 10/20/2004 7:22:58 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

Republicans have claimed that a lot of Democratic registrations are duplicates because both the party and 527's are involved.


5 posted on 10/20/2004 7:23:23 AM PDT by KJacob (All polls are equal: Some more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

Zogby is a kerry shill, and I would not trust his numbers, it appears everytime Bush is up in the polls, he shows Bush down.


6 posted on 10/20/2004 7:23:31 AM PDT by Inge C (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg

Maybe when he does his polls he asks people if they voted already.


7 posted on 10/20/2004 7:23:50 AM PDT by dfdemar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

Do some states permit early counting of absentee ballots?


8 posted on 10/20/2004 7:24:04 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg; queenkathy
"How the hell would he know?"

Exit polling

9 posted on 10/20/2004 7:24:33 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

already posted

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1250834/posts


10 posted on 10/20/2004 7:25:08 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

http://olympics.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=6553668

By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush and Democratic Sen. John Kerry remain tied for the third consecutive day in the race for the White House, according to a Reuters/Zogby poll released on Wednesday.

Less than two weeks before the Nov. 2 election, Bush and Kerry were deadlocked at 46 percent in the latest three-day tracking poll. They were tied at 45 percent the previous two days.

About 6 percent of likely voters are still undecided between the president and the Massachusetts senator, who clashed on Tuesday over Kerry's claims that Bush wants to privatize the Social Security retirement system. Bush accused Kerry of "scare tactics."

"With Bush and Kerry now tied among seniors, small wonder that Kerry is pushing hard on Social Security," said pollster John Zogby. He said Democrat Al Gore pressed the same issue in the late stages of the 2000 campaign and came out ahead among senior voters -- but lost the race to Bush.

The number of likely voters who thought Bush deserved re-election was 46 percent and the number who wanted someone new was 50 percent. Only 44 percent rated Bush's presidential performance as excellent or good, while 55 percent said it was fair or poor.

Kerry led 52 percent to 38 percent among newly registered voters, an unpredictable swing population that could become a huge factor if they vote in large numbers.

Bush spent the day in Florida while Kerry traveled to Pennsylvania and Ohio. Those three states, with a combined 68 electoral votes, are the biggest remaining prizes among 10 swing states still considered toss-ups.

The poll of 1,213 likely voters was taken Sunday through Tuesday and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points. The rolling poll will continue through Nov. 1 -- the day before the election.

A tracking poll combines the results of three consecutive nights of polling, then drops the first night's results each time a new night is added. It allows pollsters to record shifts in voter sentiment as they happen.

The poll showed independent candidate Ralph Nader, blamed by some Democrats for drawing enough votes from Al Gore to cost him the election in 2000, with the support of 1.2 percent of likely voters.


11 posted on 10/20/2004 7:25:12 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

zog is using a "guess what the exit polling would say", if this were NOV 2. These votes will NOT be opened until Nov. 2 by Federal Law! He is using an online "interactive" poll of his subscribers. Anyone that would PAY zog for anything, is NOT representative of the American electorate!

LLS


12 posted on 10/20/2004 7:25:27 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (kerry SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

They're already counting early voters ballots? And releasing the numbers. I don't recall ever hearing of that before.


13 posted on 10/20/2004 7:25:52 AM PDT by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

So Bush has improved over 2000 with seniors, women, and blacks ... and he's going to lose because why???


14 posted on 10/20/2004 7:25:54 AM PDT by The G Man (George W. Bush: "Got wood?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
among those who have already voted, Bush leads 50% to 48%

This seems to be good news. With all the talk of early voting in Florida I would have thought Kerry would have a large lead.

15 posted on 10/20/2004 7:25:58 AM PDT by KJacob (All polls are equal: Some more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

still I like the fact that Bush is winning in the early voting.....I thought that the democrates were pushing it real real hard and exspected it to be in there camp...


16 posted on 10/20/2004 7:26:06 AM PDT by IndependantVoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

I will never believe what Zogby says. Zogby is the Dems mouthpiece.


17 posted on 10/20/2004 7:26:16 AM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

My family went and voted today. That's 4 for W.


18 posted on 10/20/2004 7:27:33 AM PDT by mlbford2 ("Never wrestle with a pig; you can't win, you just get filthy, and the pig loves it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
Lead among those who have already voted may be based on "exit polling." If so, it is not clear where such polling was being done. As to the new registration figures it is not clear where these numbers come from, e.g., California and New York vs Florida and Ohio; or, whether the newly registered were previously registered elsewhere; etc., etc.
19 posted on 10/20/2004 7:27:50 AM PDT by Pharlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
I find this very encouraging. The Dems have been driving voters to the polls to vote early. They've been collecting completed absentee ballots and turning them in two at a time. The GOP hasn't been doing squat and Bush is ahead in early voting? Honestly, I expected Kerry to be up big.
20 posted on 10/20/2004 7:29:12 AM PDT by Novel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

I remember that Zogby came out the other day endorsing kerry. Or is that a different Zogby


21 posted on 10/20/2004 7:32:15 AM PDT by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KJacob
among those who have already voted, Bush leads 50% to 48%

This seems to be good news. With all the talk of early voting in Florida I would have thought Kerry would have a large lead.

I would also have thought that Kerry should have a huge lead since we've mostly got jobs and better stuff to do with our time than to stand around in lines and de-bug a new system!

22 posted on 10/20/2004 7:33:07 AM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
Or is that a different Zogby

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought we have one Zogby endorsing Kerry and his brother Zogby who already called the election for Kerry!

23 posted on 10/20/2004 7:35:57 AM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

early voting attracts older people and woman....so with those two groups I would say we are in good shape if we poll 50 to 48....when the guys hit the polls on election day it will be over 52%....


24 posted on 10/20/2004 7:36:45 AM PDT by IndependantVoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

Lessee, when you pay people $2 to write their name on a line---with no intention whatsoever of VOTING, let alone VOTING FOR YOUR GUY---what do you expect? Nevertheless, I question ol' Zogs claim about new registers. Jay Cost has done a phenomenal breakdown, and in fact in OH, MN, and IA, there AIN'T new Dem registers---that is, "new" as in "over and above" what they had. They are REPLACING population declines in the blue counties. The GOP is up a net of 19,000 in OH, he concludes.


25 posted on 10/20/2004 7:37:44 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

I thought so too. So his poll is irrelevant


26 posted on 10/20/2004 7:37:50 AM PDT by queenkathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
among those who have already voted, Bush leads 50% to 48%

Excuse me Zogby, how is this bad for the President? I'm sorry, I couldn't quite make sense of your spin.
27 posted on 10/20/2004 7:39:44 AM PDT by mike182d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
Pollster John Zogby: “It's still neck and neck, folks, and targeting is intense. With Bush and Kerry now tied among seniors, small wonder that Kerry is pushing hard on social security. Recall that in 2000 when Gore faced the same dilemma, he closed out the race winning seniors pressing the social security button. Bush’s lead among armed forces’ families is strong—maybe Sinclair hears the call to reinforce. Similarly, Kerry’s growing young voter appeal can only be helped by the ‘draft.’ Two new items to note: Among newly registered voters Kerry leads 52% to 38%; among those who have already voted, Bush leads 50% to 48%. These two groups bear watching."

Incredible bias from a supposedly non-partisan pollster.

28 posted on 10/20/2004 7:41:23 AM PDT by veronica ("Not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost all terrorists are Muslims." Abdulrahman Al-Rashed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

The link you provided is to the usual Zogby tracking poll.

This thread is about the early voting and who is ahead.


29 posted on 10/20/2004 7:42:57 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
How is Zogby getting these numbers?

Exit polling at mailboxes around the world. Special sauce. Tea leaves. Bones. Magic mushrooms.

30 posted on 10/20/2004 7:45:36 AM PDT by VadeRetro (A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state. -MS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KJacob

Duplicate registration will be filtered out of any competent system. There are only so many residential addresses in a precinct.

Where I vote there is a printed list, which anyone can see when they pick up their ballot. There would be a high risk of having a phony name on the list, because lots of people would see it. They also require a photo ID.

If you have requested an absentee ballot, this will be indicated.


31 posted on 10/20/2004 7:45:40 AM PDT by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
I will never believe what Zogby says. Zogby is the Dem's mouthpiece.

Plus, he's publicly stated he's voting for Kerry.

32 posted on 10/20/2004 7:48:27 AM PDT by Ciexyz (Feeling so much calmer now I've cancelled my cable TV. Don't miss the Demopuke spin on cable news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KJacob
Kerry may be up in new 'registered voters' but a lot of folks who sat on their hands in 2000 are voting for the President. Rush said yesterday that Evangelical voters that sayed home in 2000 are ready this time. I've been pretty depressed up until the last couple of days. things are finally breakingthe President's way. He'll carry florida, wisconsin, Iowa, and I think Pennsylvania. He'll get over 300 electoral votes. He's on the attack, he's got the momentum. Kerry is busy trying to scare his base into voting for him. Things are looking up. jim
33 posted on 10/20/2004 7:49:53 AM PDT by jimfrommaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

I'm pretty sure I don't like Zogby.


34 posted on 10/20/2004 7:50:09 AM PDT by nygoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy
"Yes, I didn't think early voting was actually counted and released til Nov 2"

I heard the same thing yesterday on the radio. This poll reeks of partisanship.

35 posted on 10/20/2004 7:51:41 AM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II (c 1097 a.d.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar

how DOES he know that Bush is ahead in early voting? is this only in FL or with the national early vote? does this include absentees?


36 posted on 10/20/2004 7:52:50 AM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
"How is Zogby getting these numbers?"

Simple. Added to the poll questions about who you're voting for is the Question: "have you already voted?" and "are you newly registered?"

I'll bet his sampling of these groups is on the small side, though.

The short answer to your question is that these are Zogby polling results, not election results.

37 posted on 10/20/2004 7:54:25 AM PDT by cookcounty (Kerry launched his career by trashing the VN Vets. He ends by trashing the NG. Such class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfrommaine
Rush said yesterday that Evangelical voters that sayed home in 2000 are ready this time

I have heard people claim that the 4 million that stayed home is a myth. States like Ohio and Wisconsin that are currently leaning Kerry are only doing so by the slightest of margins. Plenty of time to reverse that especially since the national polls seem to be going our way and Kerry does not have many opportunities to change that.

38 posted on 10/20/2004 7:55:25 AM PDT by KJacob (All polls are equal: Some more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg
How the hell would he know?

You beat me to it! Indeed, how the hell would he know?

39 posted on 10/20/2004 7:58:19 AM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: js1138

"They also require a photo ID. "

In the Primary I was asked for my ID. At the early vote on Monday, at a different location from where I usually vote, I wasn't asked for my ID. I gave them my name and they asked me my address and read me my birthdate.


40 posted on 10/20/2004 7:58:56 AM PDT by Rebelbase (President Jimmy Carter is a complete idiot .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LS
"Jay Cost has done a phenomenal breakdown, and in fact in OH, MN, and IA, there AIN'T new Dem registers---that is, "new" as in "over and above" what they had. They are REPLACING population declines in the blue counties. The GOP is up a net of 19,000 in OH, he concludes." Yes!!! It's important to remember that as young folks come of age and old folks croak, it is entirely NORMAL to have 7-8% of voters as "new" in any 4-year span.
41 posted on 10/20/2004 7:59:36 AM PDT by cookcounty (Kerry launched his career by trashing the VN Vets. He ends by trashing the NG. Such class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KJacob
"Rush said yesterday that Evangelical voters that sayed home in 2000 are ready this time."

I think that 4 milliion is inflated, although it is true that in my 1,200+ evangelical congregation, the 2000 election was never even mentioned from the pulpit (Not even a generic prayer for wisdom for our country!).

42 posted on 10/20/2004 8:05:47 AM PDT by cookcounty (Kerry launched his career by trashing the VN Vets. He ends by trashing the NG. Such class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
(Not even a generic prayer for wisdom for our country!).

Cannot say that this year. There does seem to be strong interest among Christians. My wife who has not voted in years asks nearly every day if her voter registration card has arrived. She wants to vote and I am sure she is indicative of many others.

43 posted on 10/20/2004 8:09:13 AM PDT by KJacob (All polls are equal: Some more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Peach

When Absentee Ballots Are Normally Counted


http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:mQfPktN2ZF4J:www.electionline.org/site/docs/html/counting_absentee_ballots.htm+early+counting+of+absentee+ballots&hl=en


44 posted on 10/20/2004 8:10:16 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dfdemar
Why even HAVE an election day? We are starting 2 weeks early even though the intent of absentee ballots is for truly absent voters due to travel, college students at school, military on duty, etc. To vote early "just because" is just too goofy. How do early voters get taken off the rolls to prevent them from showing up on November 2 and vote a second time in their polling place?

Military vote won't even be received until after November 2, per news reports. If W loses by 500 votes some where, Kerry is declared winner, then on November 3-4-5 the military votes come in....oh boy....

"Provisional ballots" looks to be a legalized way to stuff the ballot box for Kerry. (See what the count is, bank the ballots, if needed, stuff 'em in!)

What does a provisional ballot look like? If I choose not to show up at my precinct, will my ballot show all of the candidates and questions that I need such as my House of Representatives candidates, my local referendum questions, my alderman, my school board, etc, etc. Is the provisional ballot JUST for President? For JUST President and Senator?

What reasons are needed to qualify for not voting in your precinct? "I don't feel like it", "I don't feel safe in my neighborhood", "I'll vote downtown on my way to work"????
45 posted on 10/20/2004 8:21:24 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg

I believe "among those who have already voted" refers to voters who have voted in the past, as in, those who voted in 2000 -- NOT those who have voted this year.


46 posted on 10/20/2004 8:32:50 AM PDT by eat it, gore (... As said by Will Ferrell to Algore on SNL ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimfrommaine

Re#33 Agreed. Ralph Reed is also the brain behind the GOP ground game. Think 2002 (the off season surprise) times 5 in GOTV effort. Also, I am comforted by the black/Jewish numbers--polls and anecdotally. Vote fraud/liberal judges scare the heck out of me nonetheless. I will be so happy when the election is over....


47 posted on 10/20/2004 8:36:10 AM PDT by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LS

Re#25 Common Tator made the same observation about Ohio. The Rats and left may be in for a huge surprise come November 2. *fingers tightly crossed saying prayers--for the children*


48 posted on 10/20/2004 8:38:16 AM PDT by eureka! (It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

You are the best, kcvl! Thanks for that information.

I see that most states do not permit the ballots to be counted until the polls close or at least until election day itself.

So how could this article be correct?


49 posted on 10/20/2004 8:42:50 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Thanks for the info. The early vote number is good but remember it has Texas that is likely heavry bush so without he could be down......


50 posted on 10/20/2004 9:24:08 AM PDT by Paul8148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson