Skip to comments.FOX...Holbrooke couldn't answer question,
Posted on 10/22/2004 8:20:39 PM PDT by funeralcom
FOX...Holbrooke couldn't answer question from OReilly, what would Kerry do in Iraq if elected president. He paused and stuttered and had a dumfounded look on his face.
O'Reilly as usually is kissing ass for Kerry!!!!!!!!!No hard hitting questions for him .O'Reilly's view sure took a big spin, lets all forget Kerry's record. He said he will now fight the war.So it's so.O Reilly's Kerry's man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!or pervert ,if the shoe fits!
sKerry has a plan,,
to have a plan....
Planning a plan is very difficult....it takes a plan to plan a plan.
GAWD, the DEMS are stuck talking in circles...!
He couldn't say, "SURRENDER" January 23rd.
Humuna humuna humuna. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
What would Kerry do in Iraq if he were President?
Dial Jacques (Chirac) in the loo (in the toilet) to ask (Chirac's opinion) first?
Holbrooke was responsible for the messes in Bosnia and Kosovo.
If O'Reilly had asked him what to do about Belgrade, he would have found the answer easily. Bomb it.
Are you kidding, why of course he answered the question. First, he'd have a meeting with the U.N. and the members of NATO. They'd talk about some vague stuff and draft a totally meaningless resolution. The he'd...oh, what was the term...ah, yes...he'd "reach out" to the more "moderate" Middle Eastern Arab states, and then he'd "put pressure" on Israel, our only solid ally in the Middle East.
There, see, doesn't that make you feel better? I know I'll sleep better tonight.
This is why, after Teddy Kennedy's fiasco of 1980, one
of the many forbidden questions of Kerry is:
"Why do you want to be president?"
I saw that "60 Minutes" show when Teddy simply had no
answer for that question.
He does seem a bit slow. The democrats are a very bright group... To bad they have no brains...
Do nothing bureaucrat blowhard can't give straight answer to straight question. Film at 11.
What we really want from Kerry is a procedure, not a plan. For example, I can plan on doing anything I want - making a million bucks, whatever. But to reach that goal, I need a procedure. A step-by-step if you will. Kerry has no clue about actual, concrete steps he would take. He is all talk, no action.
Didn't know what a loo was, thanks for clearing that up. Speaking of the loo, I need to go, had too much fiber today.
He would update his plan...
There's a bigger point to that...
There ought to be more discussion on the part of candidates with regard to the major appointments that they might make. It's a topic worth discussion... it may not matter all that much who will get the nod for secretary of education, but it sure as hell *does* matter who a candidate might pick as SecDef and SecState. Attention to these appointments doesn't get enough attention, IMHO.
Holbrooke looked weak, a girlee man. I bet you the Islamic/Facsist would love to have him as Secratary of State. This country better wake up before its too late. What I mean is that if President Bush wins by a landslide, then it would send a message to Democrats MSM, Islamic/Fascist, N. Korea, China, Russia, EU & etc that the American people stand by President Bush and give him the mandate to do what needs to be done.
I just noticed something; I just saw an old Jimmy Carter ad on TV Land. The ad said to vote for Carter for a change.
Bill Clinton also ran on "no theme" (aka 'a nebulus plan') and "change" as well.
Now, Kerry "has a plan" and is also running on "change."
Let's just hope that the American people fully understand that "change", while 'change', does not necessarily entail a positive move for the better!!!
Frankly, most of us have had enough "change." The only thing consistent about Carter, Clinton, and Kerry is that their plan will only leave you with change, in your pocket.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.