Skip to comments.talkpointquestion: If 400 tons of munitions can vanish - what about a few hundred barrels of WMD?
Posted on 10/26/2004 6:37:04 AM PDT by epluribus_2
They (Left) can not have it both ways.
Or a few pounds of Biological Warfare Agent.
How dare you use logic!!!!!
Why aren't these munitions considered WMDs?
That won't stop them from trying. Its up to the administration to keep them from getting away with it.
If skerry would win by some awful fluke, we are in deep s***. and God help our troops in Iraq, the terrorists will flood the country to kill them. And skerry will do NOTHING.
To read the NYTimes story it almost sounded like the RDX etc.
was deemed to be WMDs. They are high grade military explosives, nothing more or less, and mere drops in the ocean of munitions in Iraq.
The Slimes think you are stupid.
Oh yeah! I think The Slimes momma is ugly!
the left only rants and reacts angrily. They are devoid of imagination or common sense. have you ever heard of a bleeding-heart entrepreneur? NO they do not exist. Bleeding heart liberals are in two camps: limousine liberals or pseudo socialists that find refuge in academia, the media, entertainment business or gov't insts. The proverbial
"think outside the box" mantra is a riddle in the mind of a liberal. Groupthink is their preferred analitical process.
You and I and millions of folks with more common sense that all those morons at an Oscars ceremony can rationalize that but to the left it's all Bush's fault.
Please report to the New York Times for reprogramming.
"A lot of materials left Iraq and went to Syria," Duelfer said. "There was certainly a lot of traffic across the border points. We've got a lot of data to support that, including people discussing it.
"Why did the UN lie about Saddam having these weapons"?
exactly. Remember that thwarted chemical attack destined for Jordan that was caught crossing over from Syria about a year ago?
three points to remember on that event:
1. After interrogation, the terrorists claimed to have been contacted by an AQ rep, given the money for the operation.
2. The analysis of the weapon revealed that Syria was not known (via world intel orgs, suspected...) to have been working on chem/bio weapons programs for the captured stuff - but the weapons WERE of the type that SADDAM had been working on; and...
3. (the BIGGIE!!!) Our MSM didn't report on this attack until about 9 or ten days AFTER it happened!!!
What this tells me is that the MSM-Commies feared the story would lend credence (as it does...) to the suspicions that Saddam shipped WMD (along with 3 billion to finance continueing war...) to Syria - and they tried sitting on the story in the hopes it wouldn't "grab legs". But it did, at which point they timidly reported it, though (luckily for them...) it was overtaken by other events in the public's consciousness.
The 4th estate has truly become the "Fifth Column"... and mark my words, one day soon there will be a reckoning with them.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Thats the way Reagan did it, and the media was just as bad (worse, I think, because they used to deny their bias) then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.