Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists zero in on why time flows in one direction
eurekalert/University of Chicago ^ | 26-Oct-2004 | Steve Koppes

Posted on 10/26/2004 7:36:36 PM PDT by ckilmer

Public release date: 26-Oct-2004 [ Print This Article | Close This Window ]

Contact: Steve Koppes skoppes@uchicago.edu 773-702-8366 University of Chicago

Scientists zero in on why time flows in one direction The big bang could be a normal event in the natural evolution of the universe that will happen repeatedly over incredibly vast time scales as the universe expands, empties out and cools off, according to two University of Chicago physicists. "We like to say that the big bang is nothing special in the history of our universe," said Sean Carroll, an Assistant Professor in Physics at the University of Chicago. Carroll and University of Chicago graduate student Jennifer Chen are scheduled to post a paper describing their ideas at http://arxiv.org/ Thursday evening.

Carroll and Chen's research addresses two ambitious questions: why does time flow in only one direction, and could the big bang have arisen from an energy fluctuation in empty space that conforms to the known laws of physics?

The question about the arrow of time has vexed physicists for a century because "for the most part the fundamental laws of physics don't distinguish between past and future. They're time-symmetric," Carroll said.

And closely bound to the issue of time is the concept of entropy, a measure of disorder in the universe. As physicist Ludwig Boltzmann showed a century ago, entropy naturally increases with time. "You can turn an egg into an omelet, but not an omelet into an egg," Carroll said.

But the mystery remains as to why entropy was low in the universe to begin with. The difficulty of that question has long bothered scientists, who most often simply leave it as a puzzle to answer in the future. Carroll and Chen have made an attempt to answer it now.

Previous researchers have approached questions about the big bang with the assumption that entropy in the universe is finite. Carroll and Chen take the opposite approach. "We're postulating that the entropy of the universe is infinite. It could always increase," Chen said.

To successfully explain why the universe looks as it does today, both approaches must accommodate a process called inflation, which is an extension of the big bang theory. Astrophysicists invented inflation theory so that they could explain the universe as it appears today. According to inflation, the universe underwent a period of massive expansion in a fraction of a second after the big bang.

But there's a problem with that scenario: a "skeleton in the closet," Carroll said. To begin inflation, the universe would have encompassed a microscopically tiny patch in an extremely unlikely configuration, not what scientists would expect from a randomly chosen initial condition. Carroll and Chen argue that a generic initial condition is actually likely to resemble cold, empty space-not an obviously favorable starting point for the onset of inflation.

In a universe of finite entropy, some scientists have proposed that a random fluctuation could trigger inflation. This, however, would require the molecules of the universe to fluctuate from a high-entropy state into one of low entropy-a statistical longshot.

"The conditions necessary for inflation are not that easy to start," Carroll said. "There's an argument that it's easier just to have our universe appear from a random fluctuation than to have inflation begin from a random fluctuation."

Carroll and Chen's scenario of infinite entropy is inspired by the finding in 1998 that the universe will expand forever because of a mysterious force called "dark energy." Under these conditions, the natural configuration of the universe is one that is almost empty. "In our current universe, the entropy is growing and the universe is expanding and becoming emptier," Carroll said.

But even empty space has faint traces of energy that fluctuate on the subatomic scale. As suggested previously by Jaume Garriga of Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona and Alexander Vilenkin of Tufts University, these flucuations can generate their own big bangs in tiny areas of the universe, widely separated in time and space. Carroll and Chen extend this idea in dramatic fashion, suggesting that inflation could start "in reverse" in the distant past of our universe, so that time could appear to run backwards (from our perspective) to observers far in our past.

Regardless of the direction they run in, the new universes created in these big bangs will continue the process of increasing entropy. In this never-ending cycle, the universe never achieves equilibrium. If it did achieve equilibrium, nothing would ever happen. There would be no arrow of time.

"There's no state you can go to that is maximal entropy. You can always increase the entropy more by creating a new universe and allowing it to expand and cool off," Carroll explained.

### Images of the authors are available upon request.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Print This Article | Close This Window ]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bluesky; ghengiskhan; immanualkant; navel; philosphy; physics; science; skyblue; stringtheory; time
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-299 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2004 7:36:37 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

because that's the way the clock hands go!


2 posted on 10/26/2004 7:37:32 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

Plus, it always flows downhill.


3 posted on 10/26/2004 7:38:11 PM PDT by TheBigB (Please Lord...let Bush win and I promise...no naughty thoughts about Lindsay Lohan for a week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once!

Mark


4 posted on 10/26/2004 7:38:27 PM PDT by MarkL (Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. But it rocks absolutely, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Now if they could only figure out why voter fraud only flows in favor of the Democrats...


5 posted on 10/26/2004 7:38:28 PM PDT by CurlyBill (Voter Fraud is one of the primary campaign strategies of the Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Yeah, gravity!


6 posted on 10/26/2004 7:39:37 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

LOL!!
Soooo THAT'S the reason....

:)... what a great line..


7 posted on 10/26/2004 7:40:27 PM PDT by JesseJane (~On November 2, keep in mind what mattered most on 9-11.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
""You can turn an egg into an omelet, but not an omelet into an egg," Carroll said. "

Try feeding the omelet to a chicken.

8 posted on 10/26/2004 7:40:29 PM PDT by bayourod (Old Media news is poll driven, not event driven, not fact driven, not newsworthy driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Nahhh, time is circular.

And where would a discussion thread about time be without, "Time flies like the wind. And fruit flies like bananas."
9 posted on 10/26/2004 7:40:38 PM PDT by Chummy (RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote 4 Osama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
My head hurts now...must go back and re-watch my Schoolhouse Rock tapes...

"Down, down, down, down, Graaaa-aaavi-teee..."

10 posted on 10/26/2004 7:40:39 PM PDT by TheBigB (Please Lord...let Bush win and I promise...no naughty thoughts about Lindsay Lohan for a week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

That's assuming dimension Time flows ... it might also just be oriented in a fashion 'like' past is linear, present is planar, and future is volumetric.


11 posted on 10/26/2004 7:41:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

"Scientists blah blah blah, blah blah blah, blah blah-blah, blah-blah-blah..."

If I had a nickel...


12 posted on 10/26/2004 7:41:23 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a veil for MASS MURDERS. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
Steve Miller figured this out years ago...

"Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' Into the future Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' Into the future...

I want to fly like an eagle To the sea Fly like an eagle Let my spirit carry me I want to fly like an eagle Till I'm free..."

13 posted on 10/26/2004 7:41:36 PM PDT by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

man, time only flows in ONE direction? Oh man, you learn sumfin new every day!


14 posted on 10/26/2004 7:42:24 PM PDT by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
If it didn't it would slosh.
15 posted on 10/26/2004 7:42:25 PM PDT by Lady Jag (Used to be sciencediet but found the solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

ping


16 posted on 10/26/2004 7:42:25 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Member of the PajamaNati for 1/6th of a year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth

Hey, isn't that the new Kerry ad? You now, with the ostrich and the eagle?


17 posted on 10/26/2004 7:42:51 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

except in the southen hemisphere


18 posted on 10/26/2004 7:43:01 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Member of the PajamaNati for 1/6th of a year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
"Try feeding the omelet to a chicken."Try promoting a sovereign America border concept without pandering to illegal invaders?
19 posted on 10/26/2004 7:43:05 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a veil for MASS MURDERS. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Just think we all get to pay for this drivel thanks to government grants.


20 posted on 10/26/2004 7:43:23 PM PDT by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson