Skip to comments.
New York Times analysis: [Libertarian] Badnarik's impact could be 'critical'
LP ^
| 10/29/04
| NY Times via LP.org
Posted on 10/29/2004 8:50:48 PM PDT by freedom44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
1
posted on
10/29/2004 8:50:48 PM PDT
by
freedom44
To: freedom44
2
posted on
10/29/2004 8:51:41 PM PDT
by
clee1
(Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
To: clee1
I saw the first libertarian commercial of the season today in phoenix
3
posted on
10/29/2004 8:52:53 PM PDT
by
aft_lizard
(Actually i voted for John Kerry before I voted against him.)
To: freedom44
While I agree with Libertarians much more than the with the Rats, they would be just as bad on the war on terror if not worse than the Rats.
4
posted on
10/29/2004 8:53:58 PM PDT
by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: freedom44
They are grasping at straws. LOL.
5
posted on
10/29/2004 8:54:03 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: freedom44
The NYT would endorse Badnarik for President if they felt it would hurt Bush enough.
6
posted on
10/29/2004 8:54:06 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: clee1
its nice for the folks at the nyt to have dreams. what they dont see is there was nothing on the line in 2000
7
posted on
10/29/2004 8:54:30 PM PDT
by
jneesy
(certified southern right wing hillbilly nutjob)
To: freedom44
8
posted on
10/29/2004 8:54:46 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
(A MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACK HAS NEVER LED ANY TEAM TO VICTORY)
To: freedom44
9
posted on
10/29/2004 8:54:54 PM PDT
by
kingattax
To: aft_lizard
I saw one in Philly. The commercial was really cheesy. I agree with many Libertarian ideas (save the national party's nutty foreign policy) but this guy has no chance in hell of getting my vote in 2004.
10
posted on
10/29/2004 8:55:24 PM PDT
by
Callahan
To: freedom44
"In an attempt to attract votes from fiscal conservatives, the Libertarian Party has launched an advertising blitz on the conservative Fox News Channel -- a campaign that is "aimed directly at Mr. Bush's Republican base," notes the Times article. " I've seen it. It is the most amateurish, low-cost production that I've ever seen. Try again, New York Times.....
To: clee1
The MSM has swung into the home stretch mode. It is more than obvious that the MSM will target Bush directly with some shocking story. What is not as obvious is the stories that are clearly designed to depress the Republican base. In my opinion, this story is a perfect example of the latter.
To: freedom44
I never even HEARD of this guy until not long ago . . . and I'm quite a political junkie. In fact, just a few days ago I got him mixed with with that other Michael of the Constitution Party--Peroutka I think it is. In fact, if I'm not fully alert I get them mixed up--that's how much of a nonentity they are.
13
posted on
10/29/2004 8:55:57 PM PDT
by
gop_gene
To: freedom44
Losertarian delusions of grandeur. The similarities between conservatives and losertarians disappeared back during Afghanistan. They won't be taking 'conservative' votes from the president.
14
posted on
10/29/2004 8:56:14 PM PDT
by
datura
(On Nov 3rd, listen for the moist chuckling of chainsaws.)
To: freedom44
[Libertarian] Badnarik's impact could be 'critical' Legalize it. That's the Libertarian campaign slogan, right?
15
posted on
10/29/2004 8:56:37 PM PDT
by
Stonedog
(Mr. Blather... tear down this STONEWALL!!)
To: aft_lizard
I've seen Badnarik's commercial twice, came across as quite the pacifist. Next to him, Kerry almost looks like a warmonger...
16
posted on
10/29/2004 8:56:46 PM PDT
by
Ex-Dem
(AFL-CIO - Where organized labor becomes organized crime.)
To: freedom44
Unfortunately, we don't know what his impact will be until Election Day.
The polls only include Bush, Kerry, and Nader.
With that, libertarians would tend toward Bush and fill in his numbers.
To: All
To: freedom44
Bush has fattened up the government far more in percentage terms than Bill Clinton did
So let's help elect a traitor who will cast away all the gains we've made against Terrorists. I know the Libertarians don't give a rat's ass about the War on Terror. (see Harry Browne's statement on how we should have dealt with Afghanistan after 9-11).
19
posted on
10/29/2004 8:57:04 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
To: freedom44
I bet more voters would guess that Badnarik was some type of Eastern Euorpean pastry than a presidential candidate.
20
posted on
10/29/2004 8:58:12 PM PDT
by
AHerald
("Be what you is, cuz if you be what you ain't, then you ain't what you is.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson