Posted on 10/29/2004 11:15:39 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777
Isn't it convenient that this fits Kerry's talking points like a pair of comfortable shoes?
Sure, and I believe these people over soldiers in the 101st, a major, the pentagon, and reporters that were embedded with the unit that said nothing was left.
Did you search "piling on the sKerry bandwagon", LOL
Next thing you know the "human shields" will be on nightline telling how Bush just didn't have a good "plan to win the peace". Just what the hell does that mean anyway?
Yeah. Especially when the "munitions" are just bullets and other ammo, not explosives that can be used to detonate a nuke. Obfuscating the issue.
Oregon Ping
You know the democrats are desperate when they refuse to let go of a story that basically bashes our men in uniform. Not smart during a time of war. So glad liberals have their fingers on the pulse of the nation!
But remember, didn't John Kerry say "It's the wrong war, at the wrong place, at the wrong time"? Wouldn't Sadaam have these weapons, if we hadn't invaded? Why can't we praise the troops for destroying 400,000 tons of weapons? No, Kerry wants to focus on the .001% that didn't get destroyed.
Kerry reminds me of someone who loves to get people in trouble to make himself look better than others. Kind of like a fellow-employee who's gets you in trouble with the boss just to look good.
Let's put it this way. You are in a major military operation where you are trying to overthrow a tyrant you are not going to waste time on stationing people around munitions bunkers until you have those people available to be there. If I remember right there were 10,000 munition sites. If you stationed 10 people at each site you would have used up 100,000 troops. I hate it when non-military types are trying to tell the military how to run their business. Go back to whatever you do in Oregon and leave military decisions up to the military.
Now ''aid workers'' are military logistical experts advising General Sanchez.
It must be true since some guy from Oregon says its so.
And just what group were these witnesses working for? The biggest liars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been the employees of various NGO's..
>"If I remember right there were 10,000 munition sites. If you stationed 10 people at each site you would have used up 100,000 troops. I hate it when non-military types are trying to tell the military how to run their business."<
Good post.
The Oregonian is a liberal rag anyway.
I'm sure they handpicked a couple of Kerry Democrats for those statements.
Good Lord, what is this? Ted Macks Original Amatuer Night and everybody wants to make noises like they know something unique?
Let's see now. Aside from the French female reporter who spent two hours at the Qaqaa site, now we have Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dummer at yet another site altogether. This gets better and better. Pity Heda Hopper isn't still around to get a piece of the action.
I hope you don't think this is my story? I am just posting what I saw on the news and web-site.
You make a great point... You should email that to KGW.
newstips-8@kgw.com
comments8@kgw.com
unit-8@kgw.com
Sorry ... not buying it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.