President Bush has pretty much seriously whipped terrorist ass all over the world, much to the benefit of not only Isreal, but to the rest of society as well.
Kerry "delivered a passionate speech".
That pretty much says it all for me. That the Democrats can only offer that as evidence of Kerry's support for Isreal illustrates how weak their position really is.
BTW. I, for one, am tired of the derisively delivered "Bush" label from all corners. He's the President, and should be addressed in print and onscreen as President Bush. The media seems to have no problem according the same courtesy to (former) President Clinton. Why not for the current President?
Anyone who thinks Iraq is not a part of the global war on terror has never looked at a map of the middle east.
The second point, the pro-sKerry writer has not mentioned the one thing that has significantly save Jewish lives in Israel since Pres. Bush took office in 2000: the security fence. The pro-sKerry writer said that Bush has done nothing more than pat PM Sharon on the back. Maybe staying out of Sharon's way is the best thing Bush did as opposed to Clinton's "activism" which brought us the Oslo Accords and lots of body bags with Israeli's laying in them rather than Pali terrorists.