Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNC threatens Florida poll watchers in legal letter
Democratic National Committee | Nov. 01, 2004 | livius

Posted on 11/01/2004 10:56:48 AM PST by livius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Prime Choice

ROFLMAO...especially about the "optional" last lines!


41 posted on 11/01/2004 1:42:19 PM PST by pharmamom (They can't riot if they're stuned in disbelief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: livius
I just got my mail today, and here it is. I got the letter, too. They are scared because they know we are watching, and we will not let them commit fraud. Bring it on, DNC!
42 posted on 11/01/2004 2:06:15 PM PST by Dixie Mom (FOUR MORE YEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

These letters have one purpose: intimidation of the poll watchers. It's another cheap shot by the Dems.

Thanks for the ping, livius.


43 posted on 11/01/2004 2:30:07 PM PST by Otta B Sleepin (Every time that panicky feeling washes over me, I'm regarding it as a prompt to PRAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: livius

WHY is it that every time we hear a news story about voter fraud that 99.999% of the time it's the Rats doing it???

And now they think leaning on Republicans with threatening letters will dissuade poll watchers from keeping them honest?

...SOB's


44 posted on 11/01/2004 2:37:14 PM PST by Humidston (Cheney cleaned the floor with that little GIRLY BOY Edwards!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

"Search the Florida Statutes: Search Results for: "104.0514" - (0 returns)"

Here is what my search for the cited statute turned up, i.e. no such statute found. This could be a problem with the search, but I can't tell what I did wrong.


45 posted on 11/01/2004 2:37:26 PM PST by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
"...you have the ability to protect one of the most sacred rights of our democracy." (voting)

Ok, let's clear this up right now.

  1. Voting is NOT a most sacred right. In fact "voting" as a 'right' isn't even mentioned in the Constitution until the 14th Amendment. Ergo if 'voting' was so sacrosanct it would have been in the Bill of Rights. You know, like Gun Ownership! (sarcasm)
  2. The USA isn't a DEMOCRACY.
  3. Lastly, voting if anything is TOO EASY. There should be qualifiers prior to allowing one to vote.

    Intelligence should be one. Property ownership another (as it used to be), as why the *%$#^ should some slug in Section 8 housing have the 'right' to RAISE MY PROPERTY TAXES! And KNOWLEDGE of the issues and/or Candidates.

In short, DOLTS should NOT be voting - period.
46 posted on 11/01/2004 3:22:27 PM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
Property ownership another (as it used to be)

The hell you say. I write a four-figure check every year to the IRS, and you want to disenfranchize me because I'm a renter? Think again.

47 posted on 11/01/2004 3:50:38 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: livius
You have now been provided notice of the law, and thus, please govern yourself accordingly.

BRING IT ON!

48 posted on 11/01/2004 3:57:54 PM PST by Flyer (Prosecute Vote Fraud! [68%])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I was typing pretty fast, copying the letter so that I could post it, and it could be that I copied the number wrong.

I gave the letter to the local Republican Party chairman, and he was going to talk about it in a TV news station interview tonight.


49 posted on 11/01/2004 3:58:14 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: livius

DNC Brownshirts. I mean that. Pure intimidation attempt. This has to stop.


50 posted on 11/01/2004 3:59:14 PM PST by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius; Recovering_Democrat

Recovering-Democrat had a similar post and I thought the Statute number was the same. Maybe she can check in and let us know.


51 posted on 11/01/2004 4:01:19 PM PST by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: livius
Our attorneys will see them in court if they interfere with our poll watchers' right under law to do their civic duty.
52 posted on 11/01/2004 4:05:44 PM PST by Ciexyz (Feeling so much calmer now I've cancelled my cable TV. Don't miss the Demopuke spin on cable news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21; NautiNurse; Qathleen

ping!


53 posted on 11/01/2004 4:09:07 PM PST by nutmeg (NEVER TRUST LIBERALS WITH OUR NATIONAL SECURITY -- Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
Here it is. I scanned it:


54 posted on 11/01/2004 5:08:08 PM PST by Dixie Mom (FOUR MORE YEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson