Posted on 11/04/2004 9:27:31 AM PST by UncleSamUSA
So some of the Dimocrat lefty Bush-haters are already starting the inevitable whining that "Bush stole Ohio", eh? Want a perfect riposte to these idiotic rants? Try this.
Remember when the networks called Pennsylvania very early in the night for Kerry, partly on the basis of the wacked out exit polls that aft showing Kerry on top by 20 points? Remember how fast Pa. was off the table and how long Ohio stayed undecided.
Guess what...
Based on official election returns, Kerry ended up winning Pennsylvania by FEWER VOTES than Bush won Ohio.
Kerry's margin of victory in Pa. ended up being 127,946 votes. Bush won Ohio by 136,483.
And when you factor in the reports that voting machines in Philadelphia had several thousand votes registered on them BEFORE voting actually started, I think it is fair to suggest MASSIVE shenanigans in Pa.
So if the Dims say: Bush stole Ohio, just say: OK, we think Kerry stole Pennsylvania and lets investigate all the fraud allegiations there. We have less to make up to turn PA red, and THEN whatya gonna do??
We won without Ohio anyway. Piss off DUmmies.
Anybody have a link to any county by county PA results? From the national map, it looks like Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Scranton-WB were the only blue specks in a state of red.
Huh? Wisconsin was called for Kerry, and Bush definitely needed Ohio.
OH my, let's not start confusing them with the facts.
Are any of these freaks mentioning HOW he accomplished this, or are they just throwing it out there without even a crazy theory?
Hey, when the Dolphins lose to the Patriots (even this year) I always say the Patsies cheated. Of course, unlike the Republicans, the Patsies have a long history of cheating, dating back to the Tuck Rule game. :)
Where, exactly, do you get your information?
When was WI called for Bush?
See:
Philly Fraud by the numbers (a logical look at Philadelphia)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1268546/posts
One story making the rounds on radio today was that people in poor and minority districts had to wait hours to vote, while people in prosperous neighborhoods did not. This was because of an unequal distribution of voting machines, presumably intentionally. (And no, I am not making this up.)
Nevada was close and the only bit of blue was the county Las Vegas is in. Check out Illinois. Chicago is gray because it hasn't been counted, but most of Illinois, even Urbana's county, is red.
No, they'll say Bush stole Ohio because they know the fix was in there, too. They probably paid blacks, illegals and union voters for far more than 150,000 fake votes. They'd never believe that the folks they paid cheated on them, too. The dems KNOW that they had more than enough fraudulant votes to come out ahead of Bush. Kerry and the other scumbag leaders also knew that most of them would never stand the light of day. If you slip them in as they did in PA, fake votes can work. But, if they are challenged one by one, not even the Kerry/Rather forgers can slip them all by.
How those Dolphins doing, btw?
What IS the problem with these dems? Bush won the popular vote.
They were all upset about the poll watchers in Ohio the other night. Then I heard a comment by some lady tied to the democratic party machine on FOX news that I couldn't believe. I think if she looks back at it she'll realize how stupid it was. She said something to the effect, "That there's a problem with any program that targets minorities."
(Not exact words but pretty close). I thought about their get out the vote program that they were running in minority neighborhoods of the large cities. Pot calling the kettle black maybe?
When the absentee (read Military) votes are counted in WI Bush will have carried that state allowing for victory without Ohio. It's was a complete victory...that's the response.
This was set-up before the counting even began. They were going to contest one state...Ohio, Florida, Wisconsin. And stop the final E.C. tally, and prolong the announcement of a winner. If they could have done it, they would have had a re-count, gone to court, etc. It's all about making Bush look like he's not legitimate yet again. They don't care that quite possibly Bush won Pennsylvania or one of the others called way too early for Kerry. It's all about perception to them. They call the 3.5 million win small and discount it, yet go on and on about Gore's far smaller and probably fraudulent P.V. advantage. And the media is right there with them, refusing to call states for Bush.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.