Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABOUT THOSE FALSE EXIT POLLS
Fiedor Report On the News #324 ^ | 11-7-04 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 11/06/2004 12:25:33 PM PST by forest

The first thing we have to realize is that media liberals tried to throw the election for the party of the ass again. Of course, this newsletter's readers were alerted[1] back in issue 321 (Another Election Reporting SNAFU Coming Up).

In a nutshell, the failed Voter News Service was replaced by two groups headed by former CBS News reporters with their election results funneled to Associated Press to tabulate and disseminate to media outlets.

So, we had the very-left (Bush Administration haters) AP essentially programming most news outlets on election results. AP will never be confused with fair and balanced reporting. Anything they publish should be taken with a few grains of salt. Or, like Reuters, AP articles should be disregarded as little more than socialist propaganda.

With this background, we can get down to the nuts and bolts of how to affect an election. Two words nail it this time around: exit polls.

Most of the media were provided exit poll data last Monday. The idea was to create an expectation of a Kerry win within the media. The liberal New England states, of course, would report early and go for Kerry, which would tend to verify the exit poll data and further boost the media's willingness to subtly act as if Kerry were to win a large majority in all states. With that, the exit poll mania quickly spread and the liberal media were happy to report, early on, that first data showed Kerry on top in key states.

Their idea in this closely programmed propaganda ploy, of course, was to suppress the conservative vote in many states outside of New England by demoralizing Republican voters.

That was the plan. Except, it didn't work very well this time around.

They called some states for Kerry as soon as the polls closed, but would not call states for Bush (like Florida) even after 92% of the vote was counted and Bush had a clear win. Even Fox News got in on that scam.

Tuesday, while polls were still open, Susan Estrich said on Fox News that she had spoken to Kerry headquarters and that either all the exit polls are wrong, or John Kerry is the next president. All the networks trotted out their far-left spinmeisters to back up the AP exit poll lies. Which means, all television networks were involved in spewing propaganda aimed at demoralizing those who would vote Republican.

Tuesday evening (EST), the scam was in full swing -- and by then, the bogus "news" was heard by Midwestern and Western voters. Most polls throughout the country were still open, yet the talking heads could hardly contain themselves from declaring Kerry's grand slam. Exit polls all favored Kerry, of course. Or, so talking heads thought, anyway.

They might just as well have had the Kerry campaign and the Democratic Party count the vote. They would have done it free. Instead, the media had the Democratic media cheerleaders do it, and actually paid big bucks for the false information.

But, by this stage of the game, the American people were well advised of the strong liberal bias in the media. After so many news outlets ran with the obviously forged Bush National Guard documents perpetrated by CBS News and seconded by many other news outlets, people took notice. Then came another totally bogus story, again disseminated by many news outlets around the country, concerning "380 tons" of "missing" explosives in Iraq. These were just two instances of out and out fabricated stories designed to affect the Bush campaign. Yes, the American people noticed.

And so too did voters notice the glee displayed by the talking heads as they talked of exit polls and did just about everything but declare a clean sweep for Kerry last Tuesday -- even while all polling places were still open.

Fact is, few of us believed the talking heads. Sure, many of us became concerned. That just made the plan backfire on AP & company. It made even more conservatives go vote. No matter how long the lines were, the exit poll lies gave determination to conservative voters.

So we have three major media scams in as many months. All propaganda ploys. All backfired in the face of major media. We know Old Media for what they are.

Old Media, babble on. But remember that few Americans believe you anymore. Your days are numbered. New Media is taking over.

-------------------------------------------------

1. <http://www.uhuh.com/reports/headsup/fron321.htm>

<http://www.exit-poll.net/pool.html>

 

 END


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; babble; bias; bullzogby; collusion; cookedthebooks; corruption; demoralizing; determination; disseminate; dncmediacollusion; electionday; electiondaybias; electionnightbias; exit; exitpolls; expectation; false; howtostealanelection; kerrydefeat; ploy; propaganda; scam; snafu; spinmeisters; tabulate; zogby; zogbybias; zogbyism; zogbypolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last
Media liberals tried to throw the election for the party of the ass again. This newsletter's readers were alerted.

AP is never fair and balanced. Ditto Reuters.

How to affect an election: Exit polls.

The idea was to create an expectation of a Kerry win.

They called Kerry states early, but not Bush states.

The American people are noticing liberal media bias.

So we have three major media scams in as many months. All propaganda ploys. All backfired in the face of major media. We know Old Media for what they are.

Bloggers are taking over.

1 posted on 11/06/2004 12:25:33 PM PST by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: forest
Just imagine how small the Democrat share of the vote would be without the aid of Old Media shenanigans.
2 posted on 11/06/2004 12:31:34 PM PST by thoughtomator (The Era of Old Media is over! Long live the Pajamasphere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest

What are the odds of this big of an 'accidental' screw up in the exit polls, which would benefit the DIMs, four years after the last big 'accidental' screw up, the latter causing people not to go out and vote Republican in the Florida panhandle in 2000, which also benefited the DIMs? Something smells funny.


3 posted on 11/06/2004 12:32:04 PM PST by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest

As intended, they succeeded in suppressing the Republican vote in the west where the results were too close for comfort.

Can you imagine how large the president's victory would have been if the rats had not succeeded in suppressing the vote. It would have been a 56 to 44 Bush victory...unheard of in modern times.


4 posted on 11/06/2004 12:33:51 PM PST by xzins ((Now that the election's over; I need a new tagline...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
Actually, I'm confused about the entire thing. It's obvious that the exit polls were wrong. So why would we listen to them about why "we" voted for who "we" voted? If the overall vote was incorrect why would the internals be correct?

Just asking?
5 posted on 11/06/2004 12:36:28 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest

Kerry leading Virginia? North Carolina too close to call? As soon as I heard the MSM spinners putting this garbage out, I knew the fix was in. Fortunately, they failed.


6 posted on 11/06/2004 12:43:02 PM PST by flair2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I'm just glad that ,for the most part ,everyone here at FR kept their heads and seemed to notice something was wrong with the first exit polls.


7 posted on 11/06/2004 12:43:22 PM PST by finallyatexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WHBates
If the overall vote was incorrect why would the internals be correct?

What I meant was if the overall "exit poll" was incorrect why would we believe the internals of the poll.
8 posted on 11/06/2004 12:43:43 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finallyatexan

And as a P.S. - Couldn't this have backfired by Democrats saying Kerry was going to win so they didn't need to go vote?


9 posted on 11/06/2004 12:46:00 PM PST by finallyatexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WHBates
"So why would we listen to them about why "we" voted for who "we" voted?"

We shouldn't. I don't.

10 posted on 11/06/2004 12:46:25 PM PST by Bahbah (Proud member of the pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: finallyatexan

You'd think so, but there's a lot of research that says the major impact is that it causes the underdog's supporters to get discouraged.


11 posted on 11/06/2004 12:47:29 PM PST by xzins ((Now that the election's over; I need a new tagline...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: xzins

So much for research!!


13 posted on 11/06/2004 12:50:53 PM PST by finallyatexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
LOL, I guess my point was that the MSM (including Fox by the way) assumes that it's a religious thing.
14 posted on 11/06/2004 12:52:17 PM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: forest

Where is that Susan the Witch since election night. She was bragging how she is always right and is all knowing. She is probably in a rubber room about now.


15 posted on 11/06/2004 12:52:56 PM PST by Sparky760 (The sleeping Giant has been awakened)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
Democrat support would seem to be shriveling up exponentially to the amount of media bias.

Democrat socialists are just idiots, and the American people are just too smart for them.
16 posted on 11/06/2004 12:56:42 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...

Don't let your guard down or let them get away with the crap they tried to pull in the 2004 election.

Everything from shooting up GOP campaign offices to vandalizing homes, cars, and businesses that had Bush-Cheney signs. It was tantamount to burning a cross in a yard or brownshirts throwing stones through windows.

Also the media lies and distortions (outright fabricated hoax news). Abu Ghraib had genuine abuse that was under investigation but it was not HARSH enough for the media. They had to pose photos of British soldiers urinating on "prisoners" and pull photos from a porn site to show evidence of Americans "raping" "Iraqis". No wonder America lost respect for this war and the terrorists consider us disciples of Satan.

The media is vile/evil and heads MUST roll. My term for what they did is Zogbyism.

The difference between McCarthyism and Zogbyism is that there WERE communists in government whereas President Bush WON the 2004 election.


17 posted on 11/06/2004 12:57:00 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finallyatexan
Couldn't this have backfired by Democrats saying Kerry was going to win so they didn't need to go vote?

Probably not. Also, the late voting undecideds were probably affected as they would have been more likely to pull the lever for the "already declared" winner.

The reports that Kerry was having such an early election success and the reports of being so far ahead in PA, and comfortably ahead in FL and OH probably cost Bush PA, WI, and NH. I voted in the morning but I can tell you that I was plenty depressed when I saw the early exit polls being reported and then that being translated into "body language" by the television pundits.

18 posted on 11/06/2004 12:57:58 PM PST by watchinginawe ("I AM THAT I AM."...God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: finallyatexan
I'm just glad that ,for the most part ,everyone here at FR kept their heads and seemed to notice something was wrong with the first exit polls.

I wonder if not many on our side tried to fool the exit polls by telling them that they "voted" for sKerry, when asked, to give the "enemy" a falls security and then later they would wake up and smell the coffee?
I was toiling with that concept had I been asked!!!
19 posted on 11/06/2004 1:00:11 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: forest

Edison Media Research has been providing clients with innovative approaches to acquiring and applying knowledge, using the latest research methods from both the commercial and academic worlds. Edison Media Research conducts survey research and provides strategic information to radio stations, television stations, Internet companies, newspapers, cable networks, record labels and other media organizations. Edison Media Research has built a niche for itself by developing innovative research techniques to provide its clients with a strategic advantage in today's highly competitive media environment.


Edison Media Research has also developed an outstanding reputation with Mitofsky International for providing exclusive exit polling for many elections including the Washington, DC Mayor's race in 2002, the New York City Mayor's race, the New Jersey Governor's race in 2001 and most recently the California Gubernatorial Recall Election in 2003. For the upcoming national elections Edison, partnered with Mitofsky International, has been chosen by ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC and the Associated Press to conduct exit polls which project and analyze results for media news outlets during every major primary and the general election in 2004.

Headquartered in Somerville, N.J., the company has a full time staff of 40 employees and will be employing an Election Day Polling Staff of over 6,000 people for the 2004 Primary and General Election surveys. Edison Media Research has been featured in USA Today, Radio & Records, Business Week, Advertising Age, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Boston Globe, and on ABC, CBS and CNN as a primary source of research data in today's information and knowledge management marketplace.

I think Edison Media Research's lights went out. I think they should rename themselves the Editorial Medium Resurgents.


20 posted on 11/06/2004 1:01:23 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

The Rat party is a criminal enterprise


21 posted on 11/06/2004 1:01:54 PM PST by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: danamco

I remember a CNN reporter in 2000 saying people where doing that - said people where angry being asked so lied to the pollsters!!


22 posted on 11/06/2004 1:03:06 PM PST by finallyatexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: forest
These people are enemies of America, IMO. Their definition of freedom is not one the Framers would recognize.

No "new tone" required for the next four years. We should put the screws to America's enemies--inside and out--with the same giddy joy the villagers had when wiping out the bandits in Kurosawa's "Seven Samurai". They earned it and so have we.

23 posted on 11/06/2004 1:03:46 PM PST by avenir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparky760
She was in a rubber room ehrn she made that statement. She's been a rubber room for quite some time, that's why I refer to her as Suzie Ostrich, but unlike other ostriches she has her head up her a$$.
24 posted on 11/06/2004 1:05:28 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: watchinginawe
Also, the late voting undecideds were probably affected as they would have been more likely to pull the lever for the "already declared" winner.

I don't think that the undecideds want to be able to say "I voted for the winner", I think that they DO vote for the majority poll candidate in the end in part because they concede their choice to those "smarter" than they are ("I don't understand who's better so I'm going to go with the one who won the debates and has peoples' confidence").

Subconsciously though, they may indeed want to vote for the winner (imagine being distraught over the decision of who to vote for, casting a ballot, and then LOSING; much easier to go with the "popular" choice, especially with the MSM pushing Kerry down everyone's throat).

25 posted on 11/06/2004 1:05:48 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: forest

I personally think there should be a media blackout on all election reporting on election day. Only the next day, after the votes have been tabulated and all sent in to one source should the results be released. If that means waiting until a day (or two or even three) after the election, so be it. These polls and networks 'calling' states has got to end. It might also end some of this fraud where certain areas wait to see how many votes they need. Nobody should be able to see the results of any other precinct- just send them in when tabulated at previously agreed upon time.


26 posted on 11/06/2004 1:11:35 PM PST by usmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
I think that this exit pole didn't have the effect it wanted. The vast, vast, vast majority of the people in this country had already made up their minds in August. The only ones who didn't know were people who never watch the news. They're to wrapped up in soaps, reality shows, and the like and went to the polls trying to figure out who was running for president, closed their eyes and pointed, and which ever name their finger landed closest to was their vote. The best thing to do is NEVER LOOK AT POLLS THE WEEK PRIOR, TO UP TO THE ELECTION, BECAUSE THEIR IS NO SUCH THING AS AN "UNBIASED" POLL EVER.
27 posted on 11/06/2004 1:13:59 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest

Tin Foil On:

I wonder if these two things (The polls and the manipulation of the online market are related?


"A particular humiliation for Soros must be the fact that he, celebrated as “the man who broke the Bank of England” with his speculative attacks on the British pound in 1992, was bested during this election by a tiny online futures market. We’ll never know if it was Soros, but as I’ve reported here, someone using Soros’s trading philosophy tried to manipulate the futures on George Bush’s reelection probabilities, traded online at Tradesports.com. After whoever it was threw away millions of dollars on losing trades to push futures prices down at critical moments in the campaign — to make it seem as though Bush’s chances were worse than they really were — the futures nevertheless turned out to be near-perfect predictors of the election."


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1272494/posts


28 posted on 11/06/2004 1:17:37 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avenir
Ask the Oscar nominating committee how wide a release The Eternal Jew and Triumph Of The Will got in the United States in their original release.

The media distortions of Abu Ghraib turned the war effort (here in America and in Iraq) and the inflated "combat deaths" list is purely a propaganda tool. People wrongly assume that it is an "official" list; it is not. The list is compiled from press releases of military deaths (which list all such deaths around the world). Inclusion/exclusion is up to the propagandist compiling the list. Bigger numbers serve the antiAmerican War left. They wanted 1,000 deaths by 9-11-2004 (or at least election day).

They also wrongly assume that they are war injuries; technically they are as the people were deployed in the Iraq war. Some of the people died in Iraq of non-combat injuries and illnesses (car accidents, drowning, electrocution, heart attacks, pneumonia, etc.). Some did not even sustain their injuries in Iraq. Many have died in Kuwait; some in Germany; and in one case, that has been purged from some lists, a woman died while crossing the highway in KANSAS. The Washington Post maintains such a list and omits the woman in Kansas; they DO include a man who died of a vehicular accident in Kuwait that same week.

NONE of this would have been tolerated in America during WWII. Mildred Gillars and William Joyce were both convicted of treason for their biased reporting during WWII. Both were American born propagandists.

Mildred Gillars and William Joyce are more commonly known by their Nazi broadcast names "Axis Sally" and "Lord Haw Haw". Mildred was sentenced to prison and William was hanged in England.

I don't expect to see the same punishments passed down today but make no doubt that Michael Moore and others in the media serve the same cause and are a disgrace to their profession.

29 posted on 11/06/2004 1:18:53 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: usmom

I think it's ok to give the results out AFTER ALL VOTING AT THE POLLS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED, and that voting should take place for 1 week, so that the validity of the vote can be assessed quickly. They should have proper PICTURE I.D. presented at the voting precincts BEFORE VOTING, and signatures checked against their I.D. card signature.


30 posted on 11/06/2004 1:19:14 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: usmom

I like it that we have electronic ballots locally yet the local elections still take many hours to begin to get a sizable percentage of the votes counted.

THERE IS NOTHING TO READ/SCAN, just add up the tallied figues in the computer!

I realize that this will not account for every vote (absentee, provisional, alternate language) but certainly accurate counts should be known within the first hour.


31 posted on 11/06/2004 1:23:42 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: avenir

What can we do about the media??? Just boycotting products doesn't seem like enough. Help---I stand ready to do whatever to put an end to their bias.


32 posted on 11/06/2004 1:24:41 PM PST by Stormyta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Zogbyism...I like it.

I really liked his 5:00pm FINAL release of his polling. Just late enough to be tainted by the early exit polls. Click here for the Zogby final results post on FR

I can't find it on his site anymore. Just like it never happened. I think I clicked through when this was posted to see it for myself so I don't think it was a ruse.

33 posted on 11/06/2004 1:30:54 PM PST by watchinginawe ("I AM THAT I AM."...God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: finallyatexan
Couldn't this have backfired by Democrats saying Kerry was going to win so they didn't need to go vote?

All their plan accomplished was having their crooked voters who normally would have voted 6 times stopping after 3.

34 posted on 11/06/2004 1:33:17 PM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Just imagine how small the Democrat share of the vote would be without the aid of Old Media shenanigans.

Well, Evan Thomas did say the media would add 10-15 points for Kerry. I think he was right.

35 posted on 11/06/2004 1:35:38 PM PST by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sparky760; 537cant be wrong; Aeronaut; bassmaner; chilepepper; Cutterjohnmhb; Diva Betsy Ross; ...

SONG TITLE: THE RUBBER ROOM

RUBBER ROOM (Porter Wagoner)
« © '72 Owepar Publishing »

In a buildin' tall with a stone wall around,
there's a rubber room.
When a man sees things and hears sounds that's not there,
he's headed for the rubber room.
Illusions in a twisted mind to save from self-destruction.
hmm it's the rubber room.
Where a man can run into the wall
till his strength makes him fall and lie still...
And wait, for help in the rubber room.
From his blurry vision of doom,
a psycho, in the rubber room.
The man in the room right next to mine screams a woman's name,
hits the wall in vain...
He's in the rubber room.
I hear footsteps poundin' on the floor,
God I hope they don't stop at my door.
Hmm I'm in the rubber room.
Now they've come to get me but they find,
I'm a screamin' pretty words, tryin' to make 'em rhyme...(*)
I'm in the rubber room!
hmm a psycho...
I'm in the rubber room
hmm...

* "teetotaly moteetaly"

36 posted on 11/06/2004 1:42:41 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: forest

All that need be done to prevent this from ever happening again is to PREVENT exit pollsters from asking the voter who they voted for.


37 posted on 11/06/2004 1:52:19 PM PST by JoeV1 (The Democrats-The unlawful and corrupt leading the uneducated and blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finallyatexan
And as a P.S. - Couldn't this have backfired by Democrats saying Kerry was going to win so they didn't need to go vote?

Could be but it also motivated Kerry's base and kept some from voting Nader (if Kerry had been laughed out of this thing like Howard Dean was they WOULD have voted Nader to help keep the Reform Party viable for 2008, matching funds and all that...).

Look at how down in the dumps Kerry's supporters were when he lost. They are talking about leaving the country (such a threat that Canada issued a press release saying in effect WE DON'T WANT YOU! "Immigration here is like our health care system; STAND IN LINE!"). If the Kerry voters had entered November 2nd demoralized (poor morale, not "without morals" ;), some would have said "why bother".

Bush Country knew that the media was distorting the figures. Talk radio and the internet helped to keep our spirits up. Imagine the citizens of Soviet Russia only hearing state run media; they are exposed to nothing but party line dogma. This is what we got from the mainstream/buggy whip media. There are other avenues for information out there.

In part, the media's Zogbyism this campaign got the Silent Majority to the polls in greater numbers than had ever been seen at an election. 60 Million Americans said "Hell no!" to John Kerry and the mainstream media. We knew that the Bush haters would be out in force this election. We knew that there would be vote fraud. We also knew that we had the numbers to win in the end by sheer turnout.

A good number of Americans eligible to vote still stayed at home this election.

38 posted on 11/06/2004 1:52:44 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I don't understand how republican voting is "suppressed" out west due to early (false) results. I feel as though I am the only person in America that feels that it is my civic duty to vote in every election. So what if "your guy" seemed to be losing the race. Weren't there other local issues piggybacked on the national ballots out west? I could see Dems saying something like, "My guy seems to be losing therefore I am going to stay home and not vote for the school board rep either." However, I really can't see a true conservative thinking or doing something like that. Or perhaps, were those staying home "Bush Democrats?"
39 posted on 11/06/2004 1:57:25 PM PST by Conservative Infidel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WHBates; All

Many people lied to the pollsters...some were probably afraid to say"bush" for fear of Democrat thugs...people lied it's as simple as that!


40 posted on 11/06/2004 1:57:48 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: forest

Of course, you could look at it this way: At 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM, 11/02/04, the most likely exit poll results would have been biased toward folks that didn't work for a living. Given this dynamic, it could be possible that the count was largely democrat.


41 posted on 11/06/2004 2:07:26 PM PST by Dalite (... Comment to all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Infidel

I'm either repeating what Laura Ingraham or Ann Coulter said the other day....research has shown that news that your candidate is behind discourges those who've yet to vote from going out to vote.

It's an emotional reaction, but it makes sense to me.


42 posted on 11/06/2004 2:07:53 PM PST by xzins ((Now that the election's over; I need a new tagline...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: forest

"three major media scams"

Actually .. there were 4 - everybody always leaves out the ABC Nightline FAKE WITNESSES story. ABC was willing to believe "supposed" Communist FAKE witnesses - over the decorated American military witnesses regarding Kerry's lying statements on his after action reports and his Silver Star citation.


43 posted on 11/06/2004 2:13:03 PM PST by CyberAnt (Election 2004: This election is for the SOUL OF AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: ml1954

"Something smells funny."??

SOMETHING STINKS!!!!!!!!!


45 posted on 11/06/2004 2:21:01 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (If we wanted a pro-abortion sonovabitch chairing the Judicial Committee, We'd have kept Daschele.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: forest

Actually, I am not surprised that exit polling was off so much.

Many polling places had moveon.org "poll watchers" -- who were actually holding illegal Kerry rallies. Additionally, voters had been bombarded with messages from the Kerryokies that anyone voting for Bush was an evil moron that copulated with animals or committed incest with his (or her) parents or children. I got those type of messages from liberal co-workers, and I live in the Houston area. Lots of people heard about cars vandalized for having a Bush bumper sticker or homes trashed after having a Bush sign out in front.

Now, you are Jane (more likely in mid-day) or Joe Voter. You are not really political, and just want to live your life. To you participation in politics is voting every other year. But you have come out to vote, and in the privacy of the booth, picked Bush. This despite the noisy pro-Kerry rally just outside the voting booth -- held by these really intense people, who seem just . . . a little . . . ah . . . well, intimidating.

You leave the booth and start heading for your car. You don't want trouble. You just want to get to work or back home. Suddenly someone comes up to you and asks, "So, who did you vote for?" You do not know this person. Did she come from the group of pro-Kerry loons? Is she going to take your name? What happens if the Kerryokes get mad at you? So you look the person straight in the eye, and say what you know will let you get to your car undisturbed -- "John Kerry, of course."

Not every Bush voter did this. But if as few as one out of every eight to ten lied this way, the results would be that the exit polls showed a Kerry landslide. You would be swinging the totals 20% (Which is how far they were off in Pennsylvania.)

That is what I think happened.


46 posted on 11/06/2004 2:28:20 PM PST by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
What's telling is not ONE network talking head, INCLUDING FOX, dared to even question the exit polls until obvious contradictory results poured in. The Fox panel guys had all afternoon to check the web and see the exit polls were bullshit, yet they persisted in eulogizing Bush anyway. I have no doubt some of the more wobbly Bush vote was suppressed, and more importantly, the Kerry vote inspired. Thankfully not enough.

We have no one to trust on the TV media. No one. Fox stabbed us in the back like the rest.
47 posted on 11/06/2004 2:36:58 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
The silver lining is that the Rats believed the exit polls and were doing backflips during their Swandive into an empty pool. Ouch, that had to hurt!!!

Pray for W and Our Troops

48 posted on 11/06/2004 2:40:49 PM PST by bray (Nam Vets Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest

To the degree that the 'exit polls' were election fraud, designed to improperly influence an American election, investigations and prosecutions should proceed. Of course, even if they do proceed, they will probably slip into the never-to-be-reported file, already containing the forged documents matter, the Sandy Burger matter and the missing munitions matter.


49 posted on 11/06/2004 2:42:47 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
Just more proof that: FNC/ABCNNBCBS & the MSM fishwraps are the Rathering Fraudcasters of America!
50 posted on 11/06/2004 2:51:47 PM PST by Grampa Dave (FNC/ABCNNBCBS & the MSM fishwraps are the Rathering Fraudcasters of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson